Astronomical Adaptive Optics using Multiple Laser Guide Stars Christoph Baranec Photo courtesy T. Stalcup.
Download ReportTranscript Astronomical Adaptive Optics using Multiple Laser Guide Stars Christoph Baranec Photo courtesy T. Stalcup.
Astronomical Adaptive Optics using Multiple Laser Guide Stars Christoph Baranec Photo courtesy T. Stalcup Outline Quick overview of Adaptive Optics (AO) History of multiple guide star AO program in Arizona Description of MMT laser AO system Review of recent results The future of multi-beacon AO Introduction – Basic AO Credit: Claire Max, UCSC Why Laser Guide Stars? •Traditional AO system use natural guide stars (NGS) •Severely limited in sky coverage – science targets may not be near a bright (mV<13) guide star •Bright laser guide stars (LGS) can be steered towards science target •Still requires a mV<18 tilt star within 2 arc min diameter field (x100 fainter, almost full sky coverage at this magnitude) •Some error due to focal anisoplanatism – laser not fully sampling cylinder of light from science target •This can be solved with multiple beacons – doing tomography of the turbulence on the sky Volumetric sampling Natural Star Laser Spots Turbulence Telescope Credit: T. Stalcup Multi-beacon AO in Arizona • First Light with Deformable Secondary at MMT with NGS AO system (2002) • Development of Dynamic Refocus optics to increase return from Rayleigh LGS (2002-2003) • Open-loop multi-NGS wavefront sensing at 1.6 m Kuiper telescope (2003) • Completion of multiple laser beam projector at MMT (2004) • Open-loop ground-layer wavefront estimation with multiple LGS (2005) • Open-loop tomographic wavefront estimation with multiple LGS (2006) • First closed-loop adaptive optics with multiple LGS (July 2007) Multi-LGS AO at the MMT • Proof of concept for ground-layer adaptive optics (GLAO) and tomographic adaptive optics (LTAO) using laser guide stars. • Develop a competitive LGS AO system at the MMT which can support the current and future suite of AO instruments. • Lessons from experiments support the design of adaptive optics for the 2 x 8.4 m Large Binocular Telescope and the 25 m Giant Magellan Telescope. RLGS Beam Projector at the MMT • Two commercially available 15 W doubled Nd:YAG lasers at 532 nm pulsed at 5 kHz. • Mounted on side of telescope • The laser beams are combined with a polarizing beam splitter. • A computer generated hologram creates the five beacons, 2 arc min diameter on-sky. Projection optics Fast steering mirror • Fast steering mirror controls beam jitter • Projection optics mounted on the telescope axis behind the secondary mirror • Photometry Return: • April ’06: 1.4x105 photoelectrons/m2/J • Equivalent to five mV ≤ 9.6 stars Laser box on side of telescope Credit: T. Stalcup Facility WFS Instrument Facility Wavefront Sensor Instrument mounts to MMT Cassegrain focus (beneath primary mirror cell). Mounts all current and future AO instruments to underside of WFS instrument in the same way as with the MMT’s NGS AO system. RLGS WFS: •Multi-beacon 60 subaperture Shack-Hartmann WFS on single shuttered CCID18 detector NGS WFS: •108 subaperture S-H WFS •2 arc minute searchable field. Single Star Tilt Sensor: •Electron Multiplying CCD, looking into upgrading to APD’s. •Variable beam splitter between NGS WFS and Tilt Sensor •Limiting magnitude mV<17 at 200 fps Facility WFS Instrument WFS on the MMT LGS WFS 460 fps from April 2007 Wavefront Reconstruction Wavefront reconstruction of the laser and natural guide stars •LGS wavefront reconstruction by inversion of synthetic influence matrix of Zernike modes on our geometry of Shack-Hartmann pattern. •NGS wavefront reconstruction by using the same reconstructor matrix as used in the closed-loop MMT NGS AO system. The NGS WFS is optically the same, so we can use the same reconstructor. •Stellar tilt measurements made from image motion off of separate tilt camera. Ground-layer Reconstruction Ground-layer estimate based on combination of laser and tilt signals Five laser wavefronts are averaged to give estimates of Zernike orders 2 through 8 Global tilt information provided from stellar tilt camera Tomographic Reconstruction Tomographic reconstruction assumes linear relation between LGS and NGS wavefronts: ai T bi For each ith set of simultaneous wavefront measurements, âi is an estimate of NGS zernike coefficients, bi are the measured LGS zernike coefficients and tilt measurements of field stars, and T is the tomographic reconstructor. We derive T by a direct inversion of the data using singular value decomposition (SVD). T is given by: T AB 1 Where B is constructed from ~3000 data vectors b, and inverted with SVD to give B-1. A is constructed from the corresponding vectors a. Open-loop Tomographic Reconstruction NGS Tilt Sensor LGS NGS Tomographic Estimate Individual Beacons Camera Data: Reconstructed Wavefronts: GLAO vs. LTAO Example of GLAO vs. Tomography in tracking Zernike mode Defocus (Dashed Blue) NGS ground truth, (Sold Black) LGS Estimate April 2006 Results June 2005 April 2006 Uncorrected: 511 nm GLAO Residual: 360 nm Tomographic Residual: 259 nm (single tilt star) Tomographic Residual: 243 nm (3 field tilt stars) Uncorrected: 395 nm GLAO Residual: 277 nm Tomographic Residual: 157 nm (single tilt star) *Fitting error on LGS WFS geometry: ~130 nm Simulated PSFs Simulated PSFs from open-loop LGS data – June 2005 GLAO Uncorrected FWHM (arcsec) LTAO Band Uncorrected GLAO LTAO Diffraction Limit J 0.77 0.38 0.11 0.04 H 0.68 0.17 0.09 0.05 K 0.55 0.13 0.09 0.07 Data from April ’06 and April ‘07, suggest actual performance will be better. (faster frame rate, better optics, higher return) Progress earlier this year •December 27th – January 1st •Our first attempt at closed loop operation •Lost 4 days due to snow and ice, 2 half nights due to DM contamination, 3+” seeing •Alignment of all WFS and DM •Software problems with reconstructor computer •March 29th – April 2nd •New PC based reconstructor computer, modified version of NGS reconstructor •Full system running •Closed tip/tilt loop around a natural star! •Closed AO loop around lasers – loop unstable, due to bad zero centroid offsets in WFS and excessive beam jitter Closed-loop test stand work •Closed-loop tests off of telescope with deformable F/15 secondary and LGS WFS F/15 secondary LGS WFS •Verify reconstructor computer and optical feedback •Found errors and fixed them!!! Closed AO loop on test stand, orders 1-8, 200 Hz for 15+ minutes Results from July 2007 Out of 4 nights, only about 4 useable hours over two nights: On the second night: •Closed tilt loop again - then clouds Beginning last night: •Closed loop on focus signal from lasers at 200 Hz! Seeing was terrible r0 ~ 8.0 cm (at λ = 500 nm) Some recorded telemetry lost (every other frame, beginning and end of data sets) but we have proof... July 2007 results Astigmatism Open loop = 341 nm Focus Closed loop = 130 nm Closed-loop PS Immediate future Work •September/December 2007: •Close the full high order GLAO loop • Image clusters on PISCES (2’ FOV, NIR, 0.11”/pixel) – evaluate corrected PSF with λ, field, time – calculate sensitivity •Evaluate sensitivity of tilt camera, correction versus tilt star magnitude •Do calibrations to prepare for LTAO operation: add static shapes to secondary and measure response of each beacon. Future Plans at MMT • Initiate transition to regular science observing with one shared risk run per trimester. Using science instruments PISCES, Clio, ARIES and BLINC-MIRAC. • Test LTAO operation in early of 2008 • Planned system upgrades – Increase laser power by adding 3 more lasers: one per beacon. At the same time, add 4 more WFS cameras. Will extend wavelength coverage down to 1 micron. – Implement a variable radius beacon constellation to optimize for GLAO or diffraction limited correction. – New GLAO optimized NIR camera Loki: MMT GLAO Camera Designed for deep, wide field imaging •4K x 4K pixels with 2 x 2 mosaic of JWST NIRCam detectors •4 arc minute, 0.06” / pixel, perfect for GLAO field •Achromatic, all spherical optics Science: Star forming regions High redshift galaxies Loki optical design Large Binocular Telescope Design of multi-LGS AO system at 2 x 8.4m LBT •Investigating Multi-LGS AO for the LBT •Design of Laser Beam projector •Design of Multiple RLGS WFS using Dynamic refocus technology •Want to enable GLAO and tomographic AO •Possibly a hybrid system where single Sodium and multiple Rayleigh LGS used •Encouraged by our results at MMT that this is a viable solution. Image courtesy John Hill Dynamic Design refocus and LGS WFS of LBT Dynamic refocus 4 x pickoff mirrors / dichroic Rotating turn mirror Tertiary Giant Magellan Telescope Design of AO system for the 25m GMT •Relies heavily on MMT experience •Multi-Sodium LGS •High-order adaptive secondary •Allowing LTAO and GLAO correction with clean thermal background •Expansion to ExAO and MOAO in 2nd generation Conclusions Demonstrated open-loop ground-layer and tomographic AO First multi-laser system working in closed-loop with support for science very soon Have sights set on putting multiple lasers on bigger telescopes LASER AO TEAM LGS AO TEAM PI: Michael-Lloyd Hart Tom Stalcup Mark Milton Miguel Snyder Keith Powell Vidhya Vaitheeswaran http://caao.as.arizona.edu Matt Rademacher Ground-layer AO with NGSs Open-loop GLAO wavefront sensing and estimation with NGSs in 2003 •GLAO - Average of wavefront from 3 stars used to correct 4th star •1.6 m aperture telescope •d = 30 cm •d/r0 = 1.3 (at λ = 1.25 µm) DSS archive image WFS image Ground-layer AO with NGSs •Created synthetic PSFs with additional high order unsensed modes Predicted GLAO PSFs from open-loop data • Calculated FWHM and encircled energy improvement 1 4 3 2 3 surrounding stars used to correct central star