The National Medical Home Summit How Primary Care Became the Job Nobody Wanted (and How to Fix It) CMS & The AMA’s RUC Brian Klepper, PhD Brian Klepper,

Download Report

Transcript The National Medical Home Summit How Primary Care Became the Job Nobody Wanted (and How to Fix It) CMS & The AMA’s RUC Brian Klepper, PhD Brian Klepper,

The National
Medical Home Summit
How Primary Care
Became the Job
Nobody Wanted
(and How to Fix It)
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Brian Klepper, PhD
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 1
The Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC)
The National
Medical Home Summit
• 31 physicians - 27 specialists & 4 PCPs
• CMS’ sole advisors on medical services valuation since
1992
• CMS has historically accepted 90+% of recommendations
• Commercial health plans typically follow Medicare’s
payment lead
• Immense financial impact
• Not officially a Federal Advisory Committee.
(FAC). Legal precedent that it is a “de facto FAC.”
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 2
Non-Representative Composition
The National
Medical Home Summit
Specialist Dominated
• Until March, PCPs comprised only 7% of panelists.
PCPs are about 35% of US docs.
• Many specialties not represented – including
(incredibly!), until recently, Geriatrics.
• Chair Barbara Levy MD insists its an “expert rather
than a representative panel.” (WSJ)
• Directly counter to FACA requirements.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 3
Non-Representative Composition
The National
Medical Home Summit
Effectively A Lobbying Organization
• Dr. Levy: “The work of the RUC benefits the entire Medicare
system and is done at no cost to taxpayers.” – i.e., Altruism
• Dr. Levy: “We assume that everyone is inflating everything
when they come in. They are wanting to fight for the best
possible values for their specialties.” – i.e., Lobbying
• Dr. Neil Brooks (FP): “If radiology presented a new set of codes
that had to do with imaging procedures, there was a feeling
that some people would go along with that if radiology would
go along with other things.” – i.e., Horse Trading
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 4
Secretive
The National
Medical Home Summit
Opaque Proceedings
• Proceedings are to develop recommendations that
will determine the allocation of Medicare dollars.
• Attendance at RUC Meetings by the Chair’s invitation
only.
• Attendees must sign a non-disclosure agreement.
• Directly counter to FACA requirements.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 5
Self-Interest Parading As Science
The National
Medical Home Summit
Suspect Methodologies
• Self-Selected Samples. Societies notify their
members to participate in the surveys.
• Members know their responses will drive valuations
and reimbursement levels.
• The RUC has accepted as few as 30 responses to
drive valuation recommendations.
• Directly counter to FACA requirements.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 6
The National
Financially Conflicted
Medical Home Summit
Panelists Have Financial Ties To Companies That Could
Benefit From RUC Decisions*
• Dr. Levy: “The RUC has a strict conflict of interest policy for both
those presenting to the RUC and for members. RUC members would
recuse themselves from discussion or voting on any issue related to
a potential conflict.”
• Proceedings closed to the public. We’ll have to take her word for it.
• Question: Why would companies create these relationships unless
there was a reasonable expectation that they would pay off?
• Directly counter to FACA requirements.
•
*Poses, “Conflicts of Interest Affecting Members of the RUC,” Health Care Renewal, 4/26/11
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 7
Real World Impacts of RUC Influence
The National
Medical Home Summit
1. Over-values specialty services while under-valuing PC
2. Inhibits PC’s moderating influence and accountability
function over specialty services.
3. Creates systemic incentives to perform more services,
and more expensive services. (Corrodes
professionalism by specialists “practicing to the
codes.”)
4. Payment disparities between PC and specialties.
Crisis-level PC shortage now.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 8
Pt. Volumes – Primary vs. Specialty Care
The National
Medical Home Summit
• Typical 2012 established primary care office visit
duration = 7.5-12 min. 30 years ago, it was 20-25
• PCPs paid by visit, so may refer time-consuming
problems
• Most specialists profit from procedures
• Result: huge increases in specialty visits, outpt
diagnostics, procedures
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 9
Payment Disparities
The National
Medical Home Summit
Compare Primary Care Office Visit (99214) and Cataract
Extraction with Intra-Ocular Lens Implant
• 99214 – 25 Minutes and 3 Different Problems. Could be anything.
Palette is all medical knowledge. Medicare pays $111.36
• Cataract Extraction & Intra-Ocular Lens Implant – 15 minutes.
Restores sight! 50 year old, low risk, repetitive procedure. Medicare
pays $836.36.
• Hourly rate of Ophthalmologist pay is 12.5x PCP pay.
• PCP’s job is arguably more complex/challenging.
Klepper & Kibbe, Rethinking the Value of Medical Services, Health Affairs Blog, 8/1/11.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 10
The National
Medical Home Summit
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 11
The National
Medical Home Summit
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 12
The National
Medical Home Summit
The average family
doc can expect to
earn about $10
million less over a
career than an
invasive cardiologist
or an orthopedic
surgeon.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 13
The National
Medical Home Summit
OECD Data, 2009, From the Incidental Economist, 10/22/10
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 14
Med Students Are Being Driven Away From PC
The National
Medical Home Summit
OECD Data, 2009, From the Incidental Economist, 10/22/10
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 15
Corrodes Medical Professionalism
The National
Medical Home Summit
• Lucrative procedures encourage specialists
to “practice to the codes.”
• Physicians who own advanced imagers order
them up to 6x more than those who don’t
• Stents are no more effective than “optimal drug
therapy” and lifestyle changes, and they
introduce significant risk/cost. Medicare spends
$1.6 billion annually on drug-eluting stents.
• Endless examples.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 16
Procedural Volumes
The National
Medical Home Summit
Medicare spends a fortune each year on
procedures that have no proven benefit and
should not be covered.
When a procedure…is not supported by
evidence, …taxpayers should have no
obligation to pay for it.
Rita Redberg, MD
Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine
“Squandering Medicare’s Money”
NY Times, 5/25/11
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 17
Winners & Losers
The National
Medical Home Summit
• Winners
• Nearly Everyone in the Health Industry
(Except Primary Care)
• Losers
• Patients – Unnecessary Care and Risk of Harm
• Purchasers (Employers, Taxpayers, Individuals)
– Immense Unnecessary Cost
• Primary Care Physicians
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 18
• In August, 6 Augusta, GA
PCPs filed suit in Maryland
Federal Court Against HHS &
CMS.
The National
Medical Home Summit
• The suit challenges CMS’
longstanding reliance on the
RUC without requiring
adherence to FACA.
• The case will probably go to
trial and, possibly, because
of the stakes, to the
Supreme Court.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 19
Comparison with a Federal Advisory Committee
The National
Medical Home Summit
Health Information Technology
Policy Committee (for ONC)
Relative Value Scale Update
Committee (for CMS)
• Comprised of Volunteers
• Comprised of Volunteers
• Proceedings publicly available
• Proceedings closed to public
• Methodologies sound
• Methodologies highly suspect
• Members must declare
conflicts
• Conflict practices unknown
Kibbe & Klepper: “Trusting Govt: A Tale of Two Advisory Groups,”
Health Affairs Blog, 2/2/12.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 20
Fighting The RUC
The National
Medical Home Summit
• Educate. Physicians, Purchasers and Patients need to understand
the impact of the RUC on cost/quality. Feel free to snag our stuff
and write about it in your local newspaper.
• Presentations. This is a great topic for Rotary and Chamber
breakfasts. Watch the local manufacturer’s blood boil. Business
has every reason to support this!
• Demand That The Primary Care Societies Quit the RUC. They’re
either conflicted by specialists or in thrall to the AMA.
If they don’t walk, you should.
• Financial Support. Help the Augusta docs fight this on your
behalf.
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 21
The Reforms We Need
The National
Medical Home Summit
• CMS Should Sever Relationship With RUC.
• Replacement by a FAC, comprised of
physicians, physicians, purchasers, patients, &
health economists
• Immediate recalibration of most frequent
costly over- and under-valued codes
• Better yet: scrap RBRVS and FFS for a valuebased payment methodology
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 22
Brian R. Klepper, PhD
The National
Medical Home Summit
is a health care analyst and commentator. He is Chief Development Officer for WeCare TLC, LLC, an
onsite primary care clinic and medical management firm based in Longwood, FL, and Managing
Principal of Healthcare Performance Inc., a consulting practice based in Atlantic Beach, FL.
An active author and speaker, Dr. Klepper has provided health care commentary to CBS Evening
News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, and the Washington Post. He has published
articles on Kaiser Health News, Medscape, Healthleaders, The New England Journal of Medicine,
Modern Healthcare, Business Insurance and newspapers nationally.
In December 2010, he founded and now edits Care & Cost, an online professional health care
magazine. He is a regular contributor to the Health Affairs Blog and other expert health care blogs.
With his wife, he also maintains Elaine’s Journey, which details their struggle against Peritoneal
(Ovarian) Cancer.
Brian serves on the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Primary Care Services Valuation Task
Force, and is a reviewer for Health Affairs and The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management. He
serves on the Board of the Consortium for Southeast Hypertension Control (COSEHC), dedicated to
translational medicine for vascular disease. He is an Advisor to the Lundberg Institute, the PatientCentered Primary Care Collaborative, which advocates for medical homes, and the Center for Value
Health Innovation, which helps business identify and implement approaches proven to improve
quality while reducing cost.
In January 2011, with David Kibbe MD, he began a campaign, Replace the RUC!, that focuses on the
most important driver of inappropriate health care cost. That effort has resulted in a lawsuit by six
Augusta, GA primary care physicians against the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS) over its longstanding inappropriate relationship with the AMA’s Relative Value Scale Update
Committee (RUC).
Contact Brian at 904.395.5530 (o), 904.343.2921 (c), [email protected].
Brian Klepper, PhD
CMS & The AMA’s RUC
Page 23