WIS data-communications functions and services, and implementation Progress report on Expert Team on WIS-GTS Communication Techniques and Structure (ET-CTS) ICG-WIS-4 (Reading, 4-7

Download Report

Transcript WIS data-communications functions and services, and implementation Progress report on Expert Team on WIS-GTS Communication Techniques and Structure (ET-CTS) ICG-WIS-4 (Reading, 4-7

WIS data-communications functions and services, and implementation

Progress report on Expert Team on WIS-GTS Communication Techniques and Structure (ET-CTS) ICG-WIS-4 (Reading, 4-7 September 2007) Hiroyuki ICHIJO (Japan)

ET-CTS-1

(Tokyo, 25-28 April 2006) Outcome Follow-up discussion

Position of this report

Compiling further study items Interim Report

ICG-WIS-3

(Beijing, 5-8 September 2006) Progress Report

ICG-WIS-4

(Reading, 4-7 September 2007) Discussion and finding solutions

ET-CTS-2

(2Q 2008) Contribution ICM-IMTN (cloud I) (October 2007) ICM-IMTN (cloud II, Africa) (1Q 2008) ET-WISC (4Q 2007, 1Q 2008) Final Report Recommendation

ICG-WIS-5 ICT-ISS

(3Q 2006) (3Q 2008)

CBS-XIV

(4Q 2008)

I. Approach models to design for WIS data communication structure

Design requirements

Further study items Totality approach model Design principles Solutions Assembling approach model Design principles Solutions Most feasible design

1. Totality approach model Study steps are: i) create a global any to any network (e.g. Global MPLS Cloud); ii) provide an IPVPN backup solution keeping any to any connectivity; iii) on top of the any to any network connection map the needed application connection.

Site A acts as a gateway for Site G Site D acts as a gateway for Site F

Consideration points are: i) how to connect with WIS participants other than NMHSs; ii) administrative aspects such as coordinated contract, management and governance; iii) gateway issues such as responsibility, the expected number and technical requirement.

2. Assembling approach model The team has been discussing design principles of individual components based on this model so far. The reasons are: i) differences between components in migration target period, feasibility and accuracy of implementation plans, the number of related centers, required specifications, design flexibility and coordination difficulties in administrative aspects; ii) importance and requirements of initial establishment of a WIS core network; iii) understandability and easiness of practical study and smooth evolution.

Consideration points are: i) how to harmonize all components as a WIS data communication structure; ii) administrative aspects in each component; iii) how to shorten long term evolution period.

II. Further study Items with a high priority

1. Concepts for the WIS core network 1.1 Backup for a WIS core network (1) Internet backup (2) Dual network configuration

WIS core network WIS core network #1 GISC GISC GISC GISC GISC GISC GISC GISC Internet

Consideration points: i) Backup control, automatic or manual i) Security requirements and sustainable level ii) Limitaion of backup traffic

WIS core network #2

Consideration points: i) Risk avoidance by two suppliers ii) Cost tolerable condition iii) Usual traffic load balancing iv) Administrative and technical aspects in implementation

1.2 Backup connections with alternate GISCs Team’s goal is to recommend necessary backup cases with appropriate options by alternate GISCs. Consideration points are: i) Coordination issue between GISCs but consideration from the NC view ii) Backup traffic scenarios for time-critical operational data, near real time products and ad hoc GISC NC GISC-NC connection components GTS for time-critical operational data GISC#1 Alternate GISC#2 Backup case Internet VPN VPN

Internet Portal

Internet VPN link for near real-time products Internet Internet access to a portal for ad hoc request/reply VPN GTS NC Example configuration and backup case

2. Smooth evolution and migration scenario 2.1 Evolution process from the Improved MTN to the WIS core network Consideration points for contribution to ICM-IMTN meetings i) Reviewing outcome of the ET-CTS-1

Use of closed network cloud(s) by SLA based serviceLimitation of the number of GISCs for practical reasonsBenefit of full-mesh topology in case of a small number of GISCs

ii) Data synchronization on application connections

Full-mesh or non-full-mesh with sophisticated Data GRID (e.g. SIMDAT) Unicast or multicast-oriented architectureFuture possibility to use IPv6 multicast

iii) Current IMTN configuration of two clouds Multicast-oriented network Unicast-oriented network

Duplicated transmission GISC Responsibility Area GISC GISC GISC GISC Responsibility Area GISC GISC Multicast group GISC

Current IMTN configuration Cloud I

Melbourne Washington Buenos Aires Brasilia Moscow Exeter Tokyo Prague Sofia Beijing New Delhi Jeddah

Cloud II

Dakar Toulouse Algiers Cairo Nairobi Offenbach

2.2 Adjustment of the current GTS configuration to WIS topology The team will study necessary adjustment considering the following points: i) Mapping and hierarchical design: RTH(MTN) – RTH(non-MTN) - NMC … GISC – DCPC – NC ii) Analysis of shortcomings of the current GTS 3. Standardization of protocols and procedures The team will contribute technical recommendations to regulatory documentation. Possible contribution items are: i) Comparison of VPN techniques ii) Differences between WMO standards and industrial standards iii) Standard VSAT Furthermore, an important aspect is the definition of the governance structures to control data flows and growth of traffic.

In a new WIS core network, telecommunication becomes ubiquitous and general purpose. The telecommunication managers may not be able to see and control data flows and growth. Governance of data exchange needs to be redefined.

4. Administrative aspects In spite of their difficulty and sensitiveness, the following administrative items should be studied in cooperation with other teams and/or groups such as ICM-IMTN groups and the IGDDS implementation group. i) Hurdles in administrative aspect of the collaboration framework by multi-nations ii) Adaptability to contracts on SLA and agreement on MoU iii) Appropriate collaboration schemes for satellite-based communication systems Collaboration Framework GISC MoU Contract with SLA DCPC DCPC NC NC NC Managed Network by a single provider NC NC NC NC

Example of a collaboration framework to join a common managed network service

5. Technical solutions of key issues 5.1 Complementary Internet VPN links for overflow traffic In spite of their difficulty and sensitiveness, the following administrative items should be studied in cooperation with other teams and/or groups such as ICM-IMTN groups and the IGDDS implementation group. i) Hurdles in administrative aspect of the collaboration framework by multi-nations ii) Adaptability to contracts on SLA and agreement on MoU iii) Appropriate collaboration schemes for satellite-based communication systems Internet Closed network

DCPC GISC

5.2 Effective load balancing on dual network configuration From a network point of view, the team has not found a firm solution on load balancing another network.

5.3 Possible services for mobile terminal users

Thank you for your attention and valuable comments

On behalf of ET-CTS, one of the most powerful teams