Experience with an alternate engineering journal by Charles Steele Stanford University ASEE 19 June 2006 11/6/2015
Download ReportTranscript Experience with an alternate engineering journal by Charles Steele Stanford University ASEE 19 June 2006 11/6/2015
Experience with an alternate engineering journal by Charles Steele Stanford University ASEE 19 June 2006 11/6/2015 1 Presentation summary 11/6/2015 20 years with IJSS – Pergamon and Elsevier Parting of the ways 2004 - treat editors the same way as librarians Enlightenment with reading web pages about the library situation- shame for having served Elsevier so long Search for new publisher of new journal JoMMS (Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures) 2005 Budding success with MSP 2 Alternative Forms of Scholarly Communication 4. Competitively priced journals Machine Learning Journal Publisher: Kluwer Price: $1050/year Number of defecting editorial board members in 2001: 40 Journal of Machine Learning Research Est. 2001, with help from SPARC Publisher: MIT Press Price: $195/year One of 16 alternative journals supported in part by SPARC – “motivated by service to the research community rather than by profit.” 11/6/2015 Source: SPARC web site and Ted Bergstrom’s Journal Pricing Page 3 Alternative Forms of Scholarly Communication 2 4. Competitively priced journals International Journal of Solids and Structures Publisher: Elsevier Price: $7000/year Number of defecting editorial board members in 2005: 21 of 23 (also founder George Herrmann) Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures Est. 2005, with no help from SPARC Publisher: Mathematical Sciences Publishers Price: $500/year 11/6/2015 4 International Journal of Solids and Structures Founded by verbal agreement between Robert Maxwell (Pergamon) and George Herrmann - editor 1964-1984 CRS- editor 1985 - 2005 1991 Pergamon sold to Elsevier 11/6/2015 5 Submissions per year JoMMS Elsevier 11/6/2015 6 Pages and Cost IJSS JoMMS 2006 pages Cost $500 Elsevier 11/6/2015 7 Subscription Cost per Page JoMMS cost Production cost (Ted Bergstrom) Elsevier 11/6/2015 8 Impact Factor 3 2.5 IJSAS IJ Eng Sci JMPS ASME - J Appl Mech IJ Num Meth Eng JSV 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1996 11/6/2015 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 9 J Applied Mechanics IF 0.75 11/6/2015 10 IJ Plasticity IF 4.03 11/6/2015 11 Downloads 2003 JMPS 82,000 IJ of Fatigue 115,000 IJSS 190,000 European J. Mechanics A/Solids 18,000 IJ Pressure Vessels and Piping 40,000 Mechanics of Materials 50,000 IJ Plasticity 50,000 IJ Mechanical Sciences 50,000 IJ Impact Engineering 70,000 Wear 217,000 Tribology International 60,000 Cost to non subscriber $70 !!! Apparently in response to JoMMS, IJSS now has 2 years free e-access 11/6/2015 12 Lancet publisher scathing about university funding in UK Friday February 18, 2005, The Guardian The state of university funding in the UK is "unacceptable" and the government must act to preserve the global reputation of British academic institutions, the chief executive of media group Reed Elsevier said yesterday. The comments from Sir Crispin Davis came as the AngloDutch publisher of the Lancet and Variety predicted a uniformly strong performance across its four divisions in 2005. (Reed Elsevier profit ~ $2 billion in 2004) 11/6/2015 13 Journal pricing, LISU for Oxford 11/6/2015 14 Current policy issues “The American Anthropological Association's ignorant opposition of Open Access” Federal Research Public Access Act of 2006 (FRPAA) 11/6/2015 15 SPARC 11/6/2015 What is SPARC? SPARC®, the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, is an alliance of universities, research libraries, and organizations. The coalition was an initiative of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) started in 1997 to be a constructive response to market dysfunctions in the scholarly communication system. These dysfunctions have reduced dissemination of scholarship and crippled libraries. SPARC serves as a catalyst for action, helping to create systems that expand information dissemination and use in a networked digital environment while responding to the needs of academe. Leading academic organizations have endorsed SPARC. 16 House of Commons Science & Technology Select Committee The Committee concludes that the current model for scientific publishing is unsatisfactory. An increase in the volume of research output, rising prices and static library budgets mean that libraries are struggling to purchase subscriptions to all the scientific journals needed by their users. The Report recommends that all UK higher education institutions establish institutional repositories on which their published output can be stored and from which it can be read, free of charge, online. It also recommends that Research Councils and other Government funders mandate their funded researchers to deposit a copy of all of their articles in this way. The Report criticises the UK Government for failing to respond to issues surrounding scientific publications in a coherent manner. The Committee is not convinced that it would be ready to deal with any changes to the publishing model and calls for the formulation of a strategy as a matter of urgency. The preservation of digital material is an expensive process that poses a significant technical challenge. The Report recommends that the British Library receives sufficient funding to enable it to carry out this work. Government needs to start work on new regulations for the legal deposit of non-print publications immediately. 11/6/2015 17 Cell Press i) decline to review manuscripts for Cell Press journals, ii) resign from Cell Press editorial boards, iii) cease to submit papers to Cell Press journals, and iv) talk widely about Elsevier and Cell Press pricing tactics and business strategies. Peter Walter and Keith Yamamoto, 2003 11/6/2015 18 Resolutions 11/6/2015 Very strong faculty resolutions from several institutions, including Stanford Result-- nothing changes It seems that engineers are particularly oblivious to the library situation. Examples: Colleague, editor of a Sage journal costing $2/page: “I do not pay attention to that.” In 20 years of IJSS only two times a reviewer declined on the grounds of providing free work for Elsevier. Very prominent people accepted positions on the new board of IJSS 19 Stanford Engineering Library 11/6/2015 50 Journals cut in 2004 (20 Elsevier) Fewer than 25 uses/year Or cost/use > $75 Savings $77,676 20 Frustration!! High Wire Press SPARC Sage World Scientific Duke University Press Cambridge University Press Finally- Mathematical Sciences Publishers 11/6/2015 21 JoMMS with MPS • • • • 11/6/2015 * High quality in content and form * no page charge to author, with color figures encouraged; * free universal access one year past publication, (back access) and right away for Volume 1 (open access); * support for optional non print material such as sound, movies, animations, source software, and embedded data behind plots and tables; * downloadable PDF files with full links for cross-references and bibliographical items, including frequently updated links to other publications; * careful typesetting, copy editing, and figure handling; * a license-to-publish model rather than a transfer-of-copyright model, so that authors keep control of their creation; * a low subscription price that will not grow and price/page to drop as the subscriber base expands. 22 Cover 11/6/2015 23 Computing a medieval wall 11/6/2015 24 Crack in rotor 11/6/2015 25 End 11/6/2015 26 Machine Learning (Kluwer) IF 3.1 11/6/2015 27 J Machine Learning Research (MIT) IF 4.03 11/6/2015 28 JMPS IF 2.76 11/6/2015 29 IJSS IF 1.3 11/6/2015 30