Studying the Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes with LOFAR Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe & Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany Picture from Di Matteo et al.

Download Report

Transcript Studying the Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes with LOFAR Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe & Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany Picture from Di Matteo et al.

Studying the
Cosmological
evolution of
supermassive black
holes with LOFAR
Andrea Merloni
Excellence Cluster Universe &
Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik
Garching, Germany
Picture from Di Matteo et al. (2007)
“Astrophysics with E-LOFAR”, Hamburg,
18/9/2008
Black Holes in the local Universe
Ω*BH≈710-5 [Fukugita & Peebles (2007)]
ΩSMBH≈2.710-6
Accretion over cosmological times,
Active Galactic Nuclei, galaxy evolution
Stellar physics, SN explosions, GRB
Ωbaryon≈4.510-2 ; Ωstars≈2.510-3
Sgr A*
M87
Accretion power: hard X-rays census
Hopkins and Beacom (2006)
Absorption-corrected X-ray LF, a, +
contribution of Compton thick AGN
from XRB synthesis model (~2030%) of total grown mass
Best constraints on high-z
(z>3) X-ray selected AGN
evolution (XMM-COSMOS)
Brusa et al. 2008
SMBH vs TOTAL stellar mass densities
rad=0.07
3
1
z
Perez-Gonzalez et al.(2007)
Radio cores scaling with M and mdot
A “fundamental plane” of active BHs [Merloni et al. 2003; Falcke et al. 2004]
See also Ho 2002; Greene, Ho and Ulvestad 2003
Log
Log
R*=(FR/Fbol)(max/5GHz)
Log
Log
Using the
FP to search for mode changes
LLAGN, FRI
RLQ,FRII
RQQ
Low Power AGN are jet dominated
• By studying the nuclear
Cyg X-1
properties of the AGN we
can establish a link
between jet power and
accretion power
• The observed slope
(0.50±0.045) is perfectly
consistent with radiatively
inefficient “jet dominated”
models (see E. Churazov’s
talk)
Log Lkin/LEdd=0.49 Log Lbol/Ledd - 0.78
Merloni and Heinz (2007)
Extended Radio/LKin relation
Total
Lobes only
- Larger scatter: aging, entrainment, intrinsic differences in B field
strength and particle content.
- Use cut-off freq. to account for aging gives tighter relation
Bîrzan et al. (2008)
Core Radio/LKin relation: effects of beaming
Log Lkin=0.81 Log L5GHz +11.9
Slope=0.81
Slope=0.54
Observed LR (beaming)
Derived from FP relation
Monte Carlo simulation:
Statistical estimates of
mean Lorentz Factor~8
Merloni and Heinz (2007)
Kinetic Energy output and efficiency
Merloni and Heinz. (2008)
Koerding, Jester and Fender (2007)
Issues for (E-)LOFAR…
• First and foremost, LOFAR excellent sensitivity will crucially
expand our knowledge of the faint end of RLF (and extend it to
high z)
• Feedback from radio-emitting AGN important, but:
• How to routinely calculate kinetic power output?
• Multi-wavelength approach: Low- and High-freq radio obs + X-rays
• Two steps are needed
• Deep pointings of nearby radio galaxies, jets and clusters to
calibrate Lradio vs. Lkin relation
• Use LOFAR surveys to build robust kinetic luminosity function
• Arcsec resolution crucial for faint AGN identification!