Studying the Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes with LOFAR Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe & Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany Picture from Di Matteo et al.
Download ReportTranscript Studying the Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes with LOFAR Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe & Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany Picture from Di Matteo et al.
Studying the Cosmological evolution of supermassive black holes with LOFAR Andrea Merloni Excellence Cluster Universe & Max-Planck Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik Garching, Germany Picture from Di Matteo et al. (2007) “Astrophysics with E-LOFAR”, Hamburg, 18/9/2008 Black Holes in the local Universe Ω*BH≈710-5 [Fukugita & Peebles (2007)] ΩSMBH≈2.710-6 Accretion over cosmological times, Active Galactic Nuclei, galaxy evolution Stellar physics, SN explosions, GRB Ωbaryon≈4.510-2 ; Ωstars≈2.510-3 Sgr A* M87 Accretion power: hard X-rays census Hopkins and Beacom (2006) Absorption-corrected X-ray LF, a, + contribution of Compton thick AGN from XRB synthesis model (~2030%) of total grown mass Best constraints on high-z (z>3) X-ray selected AGN evolution (XMM-COSMOS) Brusa et al. 2008 SMBH vs TOTAL stellar mass densities rad=0.07 3 1 z Perez-Gonzalez et al.(2007) Radio cores scaling with M and mdot A “fundamental plane” of active BHs [Merloni et al. 2003; Falcke et al. 2004] See also Ho 2002; Greene, Ho and Ulvestad 2003 Log Log R*=(FR/Fbol)(max/5GHz) Log Log Using the FP to search for mode changes LLAGN, FRI RLQ,FRII RQQ Low Power AGN are jet dominated • By studying the nuclear Cyg X-1 properties of the AGN we can establish a link between jet power and accretion power • The observed slope (0.50±0.045) is perfectly consistent with radiatively inefficient “jet dominated” models (see E. Churazov’s talk) Log Lkin/LEdd=0.49 Log Lbol/Ledd - 0.78 Merloni and Heinz (2007) Extended Radio/LKin relation Total Lobes only - Larger scatter: aging, entrainment, intrinsic differences in B field strength and particle content. - Use cut-off freq. to account for aging gives tighter relation Bîrzan et al. (2008) Core Radio/LKin relation: effects of beaming Log Lkin=0.81 Log L5GHz +11.9 Slope=0.81 Slope=0.54 Observed LR (beaming) Derived from FP relation Monte Carlo simulation: Statistical estimates of mean Lorentz Factor~8 Merloni and Heinz (2007) Kinetic Energy output and efficiency Merloni and Heinz. (2008) Koerding, Jester and Fender (2007) Issues for (E-)LOFAR… • First and foremost, LOFAR excellent sensitivity will crucially expand our knowledge of the faint end of RLF (and extend it to high z) • Feedback from radio-emitting AGN important, but: • How to routinely calculate kinetic power output? • Multi-wavelength approach: Low- and High-freq radio obs + X-rays • Two steps are needed • Deep pointings of nearby radio galaxies, jets and clusters to calibrate Lradio vs. Lkin relation • Use LOFAR surveys to build robust kinetic luminosity function • Arcsec resolution crucial for faint AGN identification!