History of High Speed Rail in the United States of America Texas/European High-speed Rail Symposium Texas A&M University September 28, 2009 Steve Clark, PE ARUP.

Download Report

Transcript History of High Speed Rail in the United States of America Texas/European High-speed Rail Symposium Texas A&M University September 28, 2009 Steve Clark, PE ARUP.

History of High Speed Rail
in the
United States of America
Texas/European High-speed Rail Symposium
Texas A&M University
September 28, 2009
Steve Clark, PE
ARUP
Introduction to Arup
Sir Ove Arup founded his practice in London in 1946
based on a belief in ‘total design’ — the integration of
the design process and the interdependence of all
the professions involved, the creative nature of
engineering, the value of innovation and the social
purpose of design.
•10,000+ engineers, designers, planners, management
consultants and economists
•92 networked offices
•37 countries worldwide
Arup Office Locations
86 Offices Worldwide
HSR in the United States
High Speed Rail in the United States
Thank You!
History of HSR in the USA
• Technology
• Projects
• New Hope in 2009!
• Thoughts about the Future
Starting Points
• MYTH: The United States has no Railroads
Starting Points
• High Speed in USA: ≥110mph (177 km/hr)
• FRA Track Classes
• None for >200 mph
FRA
Track Class
Speed
(mph)
Speed
(km/hr)
1
15
24
2
30
48
3
60
96
4
80
129
5
90
145
6
110
177
7
125
201
8
150
241
9
200
322
US-HSR Technology
1960’s
• Urban Mass Transit Administration (1964)
• Operational Ideas
• Station-to-station
• Door-to-door
• Continuous Capacity
• Equipment
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
24.139
Tracked air-cushion
5
Linear Induction
Rolling vehicles
Underground tube vehicle systems
Auto-trains
Automated highway systems
200 mph to 300 mph aspirations
• Personal Vehicle Orientation
1960’s Ideas
1960’s
The 1970’s
• High Speed Ground Transportation Project (HSGT)
• UMTA selected three companies
• Garrett Corporation
• Grumman Aerospace Corporation
• Rohr Industries, Inc.
• Department of Transportation (DOT)
Research Center
24.139
5
• Pueblo Colorado
• PhD “Disney Land”
• Garrett: Linear Induction Motor Research Vehicle (LIMRV) – 250 mph
• Grumman: Tracked Air Cushion Research Vehicle (TACRV) - 300 mph
• Rohr: Tracked Air Cushion Vehicle (TACV) – 170 mph
DOT Test Center – Pueblo, Colorado
DOT Test Center – Pueblo, Colorado
• Today it is the Transportation Technology Center
• owned by the DOT
• Maintained and Operated by Transportation Technology Center,
Incorporated
• TTCI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the AAR
• TTI at Texas A&M is an “AAR Affiliated Lab”
Rohr Aerotrain TACV
Rohr Aerotrain TACV
Rohr Aerotrain TACV
Rohr Aerotrain TACV
Garrett LIMRV
Grumman TACRV
1960’s and 1970’s
• 1975 – HSGT Act Ends
• No success with HSGT Vehicle Research Program
• Noise
• Static Electricity
• Heat
• Dust Storms
• Mice
1980’s and 1990’s
• 1975 to 1994
• In general, the USA did not participate in the advancement of Federally
funded HSR technology
• March 1994
• Amtrak begins work on the Acela Express
• November 2000 – Inaugural Run
24.139
5
Acela Express
• Boston and Washington: 456 mi (734 km)
•
•
•
•
Up to 150 mph
70 mph average
9,000 pass per day
3 million pass per year
Acela Express
• Technology
•
•
•
•
Bombardier – GEC Alstom JV
1435 mm gauge
FRA Tier II Crashworthiness
8-Car Trainsets (20 trains)
• 2 - 6,000 hp, 11kVAC power cars
• 1 - Café car
• 1 - First Class car
• 4 – Business Class cars
US-HSR Projects
1960’s and 1970’s
• 1965 – High Speed Ground Transportation Act
• Focus on Northeast Corridor (NEC)
• Focus on technologies
• Metroliner and Turboliner (1969)
• HSGT Research
• 1970 – Rail Passenger Service Act
• National Rail Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
• 1971 – Amtrak Starts Service
• Takes over intercity passenger service from Freight Railroads
• 1975 – HSGT Act Ends
• Focus shifts to NEC
• 1976 – Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act
• Title VII – Northeast Corridor Improvement Project
• $3.3 billion for track, bridges, signals, facilities
1980’s
• 1980 - Passenger Rail Rebuilding Act
• Shift to study “Emerging Corridors”
• Amtrak - State combined efforts
• 1984 - Grants of $4 million for corridor analyses
• 1986 – State HSR Entities and Franchises
•
•
•
•
•
Florida
Ohio
Texas
California
Nevada
• Late 1980’s – Maglev
• Congress directs the FRA to study Maglev
• Through-out 1980’s
• Individual State Initiatives without success
Texas Triangle
1990’s
• 1991 – National Maglev Initiative
• $12 million appropriation
• Department of Transportation
• Army Corps of Engineers
• Department of Energy
• 1991 – Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
• Ground Transportation Program - $800 million
• $725 million for US-designed Maglev
• $50 million for HSGT demonstration technologies
• $25 million for R&D
• Funding was “authorized” but not “appropriated”
1990’s
• 1991 – Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
• $30 million appropriated for Grade Crossing Projects
• West
• California, Oregon, Washington
• Mid-West
• Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin
• East
• Florida,, North Carolina, Virginia
• 1991 - HSR Corridors start
• 1994 – Amtrak Acela Program
2000 – New Millenium
• 2000 – Acela service starts
• 2000 – 2008
• Difficult Years for Passenger Rail, in general
• Individual States continue efforts to develop HSR
• 2009 – ARRA and PRIIA
• ARRA: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
• Authorizes and appropriates money
• PRIIA: Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act
• Process to allocate ARRA $$
• $8 billion for HSR
• 278 Pre-Applications, $102 billion total
Today and Tomorrow
USA Designated HSR Corridors
Emerging Megaregions (from 2050)
Where HSR Works Best (from 2050)
Where to Build HSR
• Where People Live
• Best Places for HSR
And who says we don’t have HSR in the USA?
Cedar Point – Sandusky, Ohio
Thank you!
Steve Clark, PE
[email protected]
+1 (713) 783-2787