SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA Last COS TIPS Aug TIPS 20 Nov 2003 COS Science Calibration & Instrument Status.
Download ReportTranscript SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA Last COS TIPS Aug TIPS 20 Nov 2003 COS Science Calibration & Instrument Status.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA Last COS TIPS Aug 2003 TIPS 20 Nov 2003 COS Science Calibration & Instrument Status COS Instrument Status • Thermal vacuum & science calibration testing complete – Tests of mechanism stability continuing • All important performance requirements have been met – – – – – Spectral resolution Sensitivity Flatfield quality Scattered light Wavelength coverage • COS to be moved to GSFC for storage until launch preparation – Periodic functional and throughput tests to verify instrument health Friedman 2 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Thermal Vac & Science Calibration • All testing completed at Ball Aerospace, Boulder • Initial thermal balance tests and preliminary SI verification (“Appendix A”) July 2-7. – 21 tests. ~500 data files. – Testing terminated to fix power converters and several other small items. • Detailed science calibration (“Appendix B”) Sept 20 – Oct 22. – 109 tests. ~2200 data files. – NUV first, FUV later, to allow pressure to drop to acceptable levels. • OPUS and CALCOS processed data available with StarView. • STScI support at Ball – Keyes, Hartig, Sembach, Leitherer, Bohlin, Wheeler, D. Stys, Friedman. Friedman 3 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 COS Detectors FUV XDL detector NUV MAMA detector Friedman 4 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Vacuum Chamber Arrangement COS operations RAS/Cal pumps Vac chamber operations Green Room contained operations and data analysis facility COS Vacuum chamber Vacuum pump RASCAL control electronics & computer Cal Delivery System Calibration Delivery System external platform provided ultraviolet light sources. Friedman 5 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Friedman 6 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Science Calibration Test Categories • • • • • • • • Alignment, focus, image quality, resolution Sensitivity Wavelength scales Stray & scattered light Flat field and S/N Detector functions Optical stability & repeatability Target acquisition algorithms Friedman 7 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Optical Layout Friedman 8 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Appendix B FUV Tests test number 70 2700 2705 2706 2740 850 2715 2725 2710 2726 2740 3600 1700 1210 1220 1230 1240 3500 2740 2300 2305 2355 2355 1265 2800 3300 2735 test name FUV focus sweeps FUV HV variability FUV HV variability FUV HV variability FUV dark count rate #1 Repeatability monitor #1 FUV timing threshold settings FUV walk settings FUV timing threshold settings FUV walk settings FUV dark count rate #2 FUV Accum Check FUV cal ss flats S/N=30 FUV G130M sensitivity FUV G160M sensitivity FUV G140L sensitivity FUV sensitivity with QE grid off FUV OSM1 position checks FUV dark count rate #3 FUV grating stability FUV grating stability NUV grating stability NUV grating stability G225M 2nd order sensitivity FUV high local count rate FUV BOA throughput & resloution Geometrical Correction WCA part day completed date Thur Thur Thur Thur Thur Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Fri Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sat Sun Sun Sun Sun Sun Sun Sun Sun 10/09/03 10/09/03 10/09/03 10/09/03 10/09/03 10/10/03 10/10/03 10/10/03 10/10/03 10/10/03 10/10/03 10/11/03 10/11/03 10/11/03 10/11/03 10/11/03 10/11/03 10/11/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 10/12/03 Test Program by D. Ebbets (Ball), E. Wilkinson (CU), and IDT. 1110 2750 1120 2741 850 3000 2306 2805 2735 1450 1460 1470 2730 2731 2306 850 1720 2100 2110 2120 850 1437 2740 2506 1730 2307 3700 3400 50 2307 50 1155 1156 FUV CDS Pt-Ne Group 1 FUV resolution, QE grid off FUV CDS Pt-Ne Group 2 FUV dark count rate, QE grid off Repeatability Monitor #2 FUV Cal SS flats, S/N = 100 G130M Grating Stability #1 FUV high local count rates G160M Geom Corrections WCA TA dispersed mode centroids TA dispersed light phase 4 TA dispersed light phase 5 FUV geometric corrections PSA Geom Corrections PSA 7x7 pinhole G130M Grating Stability #2 Repeatability monitor #3 FUV flats aperture offset 2 FUV CO initial spectra FUV scattered light FUV high quality spectra Repeatability monitor 4 NUV TA flooded aperture with Kr FUV dark count rate 3 NUV flats with CDS D2 lamp FUV flats aperture offset 3 FUV stability NUV Efficiency Suplement Side 2 Mechanism Verification TA1 Focus Sweeps NUV stability TA1 Focus Sweeps NUV G185M CDS Pt-Ne Spectra in N2 NUV G225M CDS Pt-Ne Spectra in N2 Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed Wed Wed Wed Wed Wed Thur Thur Thur Thur Thur Thur Fri Fri Sat Sat Mon Mon Tues Tues Wed 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/13/03 10/14/03 10/14/03 10/14/03 10/14/03 10/15/03 10/15/03 10/15/03 10/15/03 10/15/03 10/15/03 10/16/03 10/16/03 10/16/03 10/16/03 10/16/03 10/16/03 10/17/03 10/17/03 10/18/03 10/18/03 10/20/03 10/20/03 10/21/03 10/21/03 10/22/03 Friedman 9 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 FUV G130M Spectral Resolution Segment A SegmentFriedman 10 of 25 BTIPS - 20 November 2003 FUV G130M Spectral Resolution Friedman 11 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 NUV G225M Spectral Resolution 30000 29000 28000 27000 lam2186 lam2217 lam2233 lam2250 lam2268 lam2283 lam2306 lam2325 lam2339 lam2357 lam2373 lam2390 lam2410 26000 25000 24000 23000 22000 21000 Requirement 20000 19000 18000 17000 2070 2170 2270 2370 2470 2570 Friedman 12 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Spectral Resolution Summary • FUV channel – G130M & G160M – G140L R > 20,000 R > 2,000 • NUV channel – G185M – G225M & G285M – G230L R > 16,000 R > 20,000 R > 1,700 (over most of bandpass) • Bright Object Aperture (BOA) resolution degraded – Wedge in ND filter degrades resolution by factor of ~2.5 for FUV modes and ~4 for NUV modes. Friedman 13 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 FUV Sensitivity Detector QE Segment A Detector QE Segment B This point falls outside the specified wavelength range and thus does not violate requirements. Friedman 14 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 NUV Flat Structure B A COS G185M NUV P-flat 1.36% Poisson rms 1000 Intrinsic detector scatter (1s=3.25%) within the 100x100 pixel box shown in dashed lines 500 Pixel (dispersion) Pixel (dispersion) C 20,000 - 40,000 0 counts per pixel in each stripe 500 Pixel (cross-dispersion) 1000 Friedman 15 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 NUV Flatfield S/N Normalized ratio of first half of exposure to second half Friedman 16 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 FUV & NUV Flat Fields Friedman 17 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 NUV Spatial Resolution Friedman 18 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 Optics Select Mechanism (OSM) Optics Select Mechanism Two • Full 360 Degree Rotation • 101 arcsecond step size, with selectable step rate (78 steps/sec baselined) • Coarse and fine resolvers provide position feedback Ferris wheel mode Friedman 19 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 OSM Stability with Time Helicopter mode (typical component test results) 1 resel ~ 4 minutes G160M G130M G140L NCM-1 Friedman 20 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 G130M Segment A – Helicopter Orientation -0.906 Arcseconds of Drift Friedman 21 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 G160M Segment A – Helicopter Orientation G160M Seg A Image Motion in Helicopter Orientation 1 0.5 0 -01.069 Arcseconds of Drift X-drift 1 X-drift 2 X-drift 3 X-drift 4 X-drift 5 X-drift 6 X-drift 7 X-drift 8 X-drift 9 X-drift 10 X-drift 11 X-drift 12 X-drift 13 Average Motion (pixels) -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 -2.5 -3 -3.5 -4 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Time (sec) Friedman 22 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 G185M – Helicopter Orientation -9.39 Arcseconds of Drift Friedman 23 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 OSM Stability Summary • The OSM met stability requirements in component level testing (helicopter mode). • Science calibration (Ferris wheel mode): OSM1 & OSM2 did not meet requirements in some cases. • Post science cal GN2 testing (helicopter mode) has shown excessive drift in some test cases. – OSM relaxation may be due to thermal effects. Bench is not thermally controlled in helicopter mode. • Ball conducting additional test to further characterize problem. • COWG and COS FIG groups will consider operational changes to mitigate the problem. COS IS evaluating science impacts. Friedman 24 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003 COS Science Calibration Summary and Status • Science calibration complete – All instrument modes exercised. – Instrument stimulated by continuum, emission line, and absorption line (O2 and CO) sources. • Performance is excellent – Resolution, sensitivity, alignment, image quality, focus. • • • • Flight software performed as expected OSM stability under investigation Expect shipment to GSFC shortly Functional tests every 3 months; NUV throughput tests every 6 months • OPUS and CALCOS processed thermal vacuum test data in MAST. Friedman 25 of 25 TIPS - 20 November 2003