Chapter 11 Power and Political Behavior Concept of Power Power – the ability to influence another person Influence – the process of affecting.
Download
Report
Transcript Chapter 11 Power and Political Behavior Concept of Power Power – the ability to influence another person Influence – the process of affecting.
Chapter 11
Power and Political Behavior
Concept of Power
Power – the ability to influence another person
Influence – the process of affecting the thoughts,
behavior, and feelings of another person
Authority – the right to influence another person
Concept of Power
Copyright ©2006
by South-Western,
a division of
Thomson Learning.
All rights reserved
Zone of Indifference – the range in which attempts
to influence a person will be perceived as legitimate
and will be acted on without a great deal of thought
Zone of Indifference
Managers strive to expand
the zone of indifference
Zone of Indifference
Sources of Organizational
Power: Interpersonal
Reward Power – agent’s ability to control the
rewards that the target wants
Coercive Power – agent’s ability to cause an
unpleasant experience for a target
Legitimate Power – agent and target agree that
agent has influential rights, based on position
and mutual agreement
Sources of Organizational
Power: Interpersonal
Referent Power – based on interpersonal attraction
Expert Power – agent has knowledge target needs
Which Power is Most Effective?
Expert Power!
Strong relationship to performance & satisfaction
Transfers vital skills, abilities, and knowledge within the
organization
Employees internalize what they observe & learn from
managers they consider “experts”
Information Power
Information Power – access to and
control over important information
Formal/informal position in
communication network
Interpreting
information when
passing it on
(the spin)
Criteria for Using Power Ethically
Does the behavior produce a good outcome for
people both inside and outside the
organization?
Does the behavior respect the rights of all
parties?
Does the behavior treat all parties equitably
and fairly?
Two Faces of Power
Personal Power
used for personal gain
Social Power
used to create motivation
used to accomplish group
goals
Successful Power Users
Have high need for social power
Approach relationships with a communal
orientation
Focus on needs and interests of others
belief in the
authority
system
preference for
work and
discipline
belief in
justice
altruism
Sources of Organizational Power:
Intergroup
Control of critical resources
Control of strategic contingencies –
activities that other groups need to
complete their tasks
Sources of Organizational Power:
Intergroup
Ways groups hold power over other groups
Ability to cope with uncertainty
High degree of centrality - functionality
central to organization’s success
Nonsubstitutability - group’s activities are
indispensable
Power Analysis:
A Broader View
Organizational Power
Coercive Power – influence through threat
of punishment, fear, or intimidation
Utilitarian Power – influence through
rewards and benefits
Normative Power – influence through
knowledge of belonging, doing the right
thing
Power Analysis:
A Broader View
Organizational Membership
Alienative Membership – members feel
hostile, negative, do not want to be there
Calculative Membership – members
weigh benefits and limitations of belonging
Moral Membership – members have
positive organizational feelings; will deny
own needs
Etzioni’s Power Analysis
Type of Membership
Alienative
Calculative
Moral
Coercive
Utilitarian
Normative
Type of Power
SOURCE: Adapted from Amitai Etzioni, Modern Organizations (Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964), 59-61.
Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Kanter’s Symbols of Power
Intercede
for someone in trouble
Obtain placements
for favored employees
Exceed
budget limitations
Procure
above-average raises for employees
Place
items on meeting agendas
Access
Have
to early information
top managers seek out their opinion
Kanter’s Symbols of Powerlessness
Top Executives
• budget cuts
• punishing behaviors
• top-down communications
Managers
Staff Professionals
• resistance to change
• turf protection
First-line Supervisors
• overly close supervision
• assign external attribution blame others or environment • inflexible adherence to rules
• do job rather than train
Key to overcoming powerlessness:
share power and delegate decision making
Copyright ©2006
by South-Western,
a division of
Thomson Learning.
All rights reserved
Korda’s Power Symbols
Power – there are more people who inconvenience
themselves on your behalf than there are people
on whose behalf you would inconvenience
yourself
Status – a person’s relative standing in a group
based on prestige and deference
Korda’s Power Symbols
Size of desk
Rectangular table
Locked file cabinet
Furnishings
Time
Access
Who has access
to you?
To whom do you
have access?
Political Behavior in Organizations
Organizational Politics – the use of power and
influence in organizations
Political Behavior – actions not officially
sanctioned by an organization that are taken
to influence others in order to meet one’s
personal goals
Conditions Encouraging
Political Activity
Unclear goals
Autocratic decision making
Ambiguous lines of authority
Scarce resources
Uncertainty
Effective Political Characteristics
What characteristics do
effective political actors
possess?
Influence Tactics
Consultation
Inspirational appeals
Rational persuasion
Ingratiation
Coalition
Exchange tactics
Upward appeals
Pressure
Copyright ©2006
by South-Western,
a division of
Thomson Learning.
All rights reserved
Upward Influence:
the boss
Lateral
Influence:
a coworker
Downward Influence:
an employee
Influence by Consultation
This new attendance plan is controversial.
How can we make it more acceptable?
The person seeks your participation in making
a decision or planning how to implement a
proposed strategy, policy, or change.
Influence by Rational Persuasion
This new procedure will save us
over $150,000.
The person uses logical arguments and factual
evidence to persuade you that a proposal or
request is viable and likely to result in the
attainment of task objectives.
Influence by Inspirational Appeals
Getting that account will be
tough, but I know you can do it.
The person makes an emotional request or
proposal that arouses enthusiasm by appealing
to your values and ideals, or by increasing your
confidence that you can do it.
Influence by Ingratiation
Only you can do this job right!
The person seeks to get you in a good mood or
to think favorably of him or her before asking
you to do something.
Information on slides 23-27 from the first two columns from G. Yuki and C. M. Falbe. “Influence Tactics and Objectives in Upward, Downward, and
Lateral Influence Attempts.” Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (1990): 132-140. Copyright © 1990 by the American Psychological Association.
Reprinted with permission.
Managing Political Behavior
Maintain open communication
Clarify performance expectations
Use participative management
Encourage cooperation among work
groups
Manage scarce resources well
Provide a supportive organizational
climate
Copyright ©2006
by South-Western,
a division of
Thomson Learning.
All rights reserved
Managing Up: The Boss
Understand Your Boss
and Her Context
Her goals and
objectives
The pressures on her
Her strengths,
weaknesses, blind
spots
Her preferred work
style
Assess Yourself
and Your Needs
Your own strengths and
weaknesses
Your personal style
Your predisposition
toward dependence on
authority figures
Managing Up: The Boss
Develop and Maintain a Relationship that
Fits both your needs and styles
Is characterized by mutual expectations
Keeps your boss informed
Is based on dependability and honesty
Selectively uses your boss’s time and
resources
SOURCE: Information on slides 29-30 adapted and reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Review. From J. J. Gabarro and J. P.
Kotter, “Managing Your Boss,” Harvard Business Review (January-February 1980): 92-100. Copyright© 1980 by the Harvard Business
School Publishing Corporation; all rights reserved.
Sharing Power: Empowerment
Empowerment:
sharing power in such a
way that individuals learn
to believe in their ability
to do the job!
Empowerment’s Four Dimensions
Competence –
belief that one has
the ability to do the
job well
Meaning –
fit between the work
role and the
employee’s values
and beliefs
E2s
Self-determination –
having control over
the way one does
one’s work
Impact – belief that
one’s job makes a
difference within the
organization
Guidelines for Empowering
Express confidence in employees
Set high performance expectations
Create opportunities for participative decision
making
Remove bureaucratic constraints that stifle
autonomy
Set inspirational and meaningful goals
Decision-Making Authority over Job Context
Employee Empowerment Grid
Implement
Follow-up
Point D
Mission Defining
Point E
Self-management
Alt. Choice
Point C
Participatory
Empowerment
Alt. Eval
Alt. Dev
Problem Id.
Point A
No Discretion
Problem Id.
Copyright ©2006
by South-Western,
a division of
Thomson Learning.
All rights reserved
Alt. Dev
Point B
Task Setting
Alt. Eval
Alt.
Implement
Choice Follow-up
Decision-Making Authority over Job Content
Amitai Etzioni, Modern Organizations, 1964, pp.... 59-61. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Finkelstein:
Why Executives Fail
See themselves and their companies as
dominant, without peers
Have all the answers
Eliminate those not 100% behind them
Rely on what worked in the past
No clear boundaries between personal
interests and corporate interests
Using Power Effectively
Use power in ethical ways
Understand and use all of the various
types of power and influence
Seek out jobs that allow you to develop
your power skills
Use power tempered by maturity and selfcontrol
Accept that influencing people is an
important part of the management job