Venous Access Matthew L. Paden, MD Emory University Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston.

Download Report

Transcript Venous Access Matthew L. Paden, MD Emory University Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston.

Venous Access
Matthew L. Paden, MD
Emory University
Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston
Peripheral IV

Butterfly & angiocaths
–
–
Short catheters generally placed in forearm, hand
or scalp veins
Short term therapy and unable to handle caustic
chemicals (chemotherapy)
Peripheral Sites

Veins of the Forearm

1. Cephalic vein
2. Median Cubital vein
3. Accessory Cephalic
vein
4. Basilic vein
5. Cephalic vein
6. Median antebrachial
vein
Peripheral Sites

Veins of the Hand

1. Digital Dorsal veins
2. Dorsal Metacarpal veins
3. Dorsal venous network
4. Cephalic vein
5. Basilic vein
Peripheral IVs

Try to cannulate the most distal veins first
–


Drugs or fluids put through the cannula may
extravasate at the upstream failed cannula site
Transillumination
Topical nitropaste
Infiltration
Extravasation
Extravasation
Phlebitis
Cellulitis
Types of Central Vascular Access
Devices



Non-tunneling
Tunneling
Implanted
Non-Tunneling

Direct venipuncture through the skin into a
selected vein.
–
–
–
Peripheral IV
Peripherally inserted central catheter
Percutaneous catheters
Non-Tunneling - PICC

Peripherally inserted central catheters
(PICC)
–

Midline
Central venous catheter inserted at or
above the antecubital space and then
advanced until the distal tip of the
catheter is positioned at the superior vena
cava or superior vena cava and right atrial
junction.
Non-tunneling - PICC



Useful for patient receiving
long term medication
therapy, chemotherapy or
TPN
Used for frequent blood
sampling
Distal end positioned at the
superior vena cava or
junction of superior vena
cava and right atrium
Non-Tunneling - PICC

Peripherally inserted central catheters
(PICC)
Non-Tunneling - Midlines



Used for shorter term
intravenous therapy
(up to 4 weeks)
Used for frequent
blood sampling
Distal end positioned
at the proximal end of
the upper extremity
PICC versus Midline
Non-Tunneling – PICC and Midline
examples at the antecubital & above
Non-Tunneling – CVC


Percutaneous catheters
Also known as: Central Venous Catheters
(CVC)
–
–
Subclavian, femoral or internal jugular
Single, double or triple lumen
Non-tunneling - CVC


Tip advanced to superior
vena cava or SVC and
right atrium junction
As with PICC, appropriate
for patients requiring long
term chemotherapy or
TPN
Non-tunneling CVC subclavian site
Tunneling



Hickman®
Broviac®
Groshong®
Tunneling



Inserted into a central
vein via percutaneous
venipuncture or cut down
Catheter then tunneled
under the skin in the
subcutaneous tissue and
exited in a convenient
location
Dacron cuff hold the
catheter in place
Tunneled
Hickman
Catheter
Tunneling - Broviac®


Similar to the Hickman
catheter, but is of smaller
size.
This catheter is mostly
used for pediatric
patients.
Tunneling - Groshong®

Similar to Hickman®
and Broviac® with
closed ended patented
3-way valve.
Implanted VADs - Ports



Catheter attached to a
self-sealing silicone
septum surrounded by a
titanium, stainless steal
or plastic port
Port sutured under the
skin
Some brand names:
–
–
–
Port-a-cath®
Infus-a-port®
Power Port ®
Implanted VADs - Ports



Catheter runs from
port to superior
vena cava at the
right atrium
No part of the
device is exposed
outside the body
Can deliver
chemotherapy,
TPN, antibiotics,
blood products and
blood sampling
Implanted VADs - Ports


Can only be accessed
with special needle
called a HUBER needle
Contains a deflecting,
non-coring point
Insertion Complications






Inadvertent Arterial Puncture
Hematoma Formation
Extravasation
Infection
Phlebitis
Pneumothorax
Adult Insertion Complications
Systemic Complications




Infection
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Pulmonary Embolism
Superior Vena Cava Syndrome
Mechanical Complication



Catheter tip migration
Broken or damaged catheter
Catheter occlusion
Femoral Vein

Adults –
–
–
–
DVT
Excess infection risk
“Potentially inaccurate CVP”
Femoral Vein

Kids –
–
–
–
–
–
Better risk profile
Ease of insertion, compressible
No difference in DVT – ref 1-2
Same infection risk (maybe lower) – ref 3-5
Accurately reflects RAP if no increase in
abdominal pressures – ref 6-8
1. Beck C, et al. J Ped 1998;133:237-41.
2. Jacobs B, et al. Crit Care Med 1999;27:A29
3. Casado-Flores J, et al. Ped Crit Care Med 2001;2:5762.
4. Richards M, et al. NNIS Pediatrics 1999;103:103-9
5. Stenzel JP, et al. J Ped 1989;114:411-5.
6. Fernendez E, et al. Ped Crit Care Med 2004;5:14-18
7. Lloyd R, et al. Pediatrics 1992;89:506-8.
8. Ho K, et al. Crit Care Med 1998;26:461-4.
Femoral anatomy

Vein is medial to the
artery
–


Froehlich’s theorem
Superficial distal to
inguinal ligament, then
dives deep
0.5-2cm inferior to the
inguinal ligament
Quiz Question

What are the anatomic landmarks to determine
where to stick for the femoral vein in a pulseless
patient?
–
–
–
–
A. 1/3 of the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine
to the pubic tubercle
B. ½ the distance between the pubic tubercle and the
anterior superior iliac spine
C. 1/3 of the distance from the pubic tubercle and the
anterior superior iliac spine
D. None of the above
Quiz answer



D. None of the above
The femoral ARTERY lies ½ the distance
between the pubic tubercle and the anterior
superior iliac spine.
The femoral vein is 0.5-1.5 cm medial to this
depending on the size of the patient.
Straight vs. Frog leg

“The optimal positioning
of the leg can vary
according to the
preference of the
operator.”
–
Discuss
Procedure


30-45 degree angle to skin
2 methods
–
–
Stick with negative pressure
on syringe while entering
and exiting
Insert needle, and only
negative pressure on
removal

Allows you to better
stabilize the needle by
resting your hand on the
thigh
Procedure

Blood flash - Insert wire
–
Wire not going smoothly





Needle no longer in vessel
False tracking in subcutaneous tissue
Thrombus
Advancing into lumbar veins
Small incision
–
Blade directed away from wire
Procedure







Twisting motion of dilation
Remove dilator
Advance catheter
Remove wire
Aspirate and flush all ports
Secure line with sutures
Sterile dressing
Seldinger Technique
Procedure

Wheeler – “Confirmation of proper CVC
position is required after placement of all
CVC’s”
Warnings





If you hit the artery – pressure until hemostatic
Wire should float – should never have resistance
If can’t pull the wire through the needle – remove
both wire and needle together so you don’t sheer off
the wire
Never let go of the wire
Catheter tip “pointing too cephalad” – in lumbar veins
Complications




74 of 89 (83%) – no complications
Other 15 – minor bleeding/hematoma
94.4% success rate
Median duration 5 days
–
–

21% <3 days
43% 4-7 days
26% 7-14 days
10% >14 days
Long term – 8 leg swelling, 11 BSI
Venkataraman, et al. Clin Ped 1997;36:311-9.
Complications




45 months – 395 CVL – 162 femoral
No insertion complications
Mean duration 8.9 days
9 noninfectious complications
–

4 thrombosis, 1 perforation, 1 embolism, 2 bleeding
“The low incidence of complications in this study
suggests that the femoral vein is the preferred site in
most critically ill children when CVC is indicated.”
Stenzel JP, et al. J Ped 1989;114:411-5
Site Selection
Site
Femoral
Pro’s
 Easy access
 Large vessel
 Good access
during
resuscitation
11/6/2015
Con’s
 Decreased
mobility
 Increased risk
of thrombosis,
phlebitis &
infection
 Easily
contaminated
 Close to
femoral artery
 Dressing
difficult to
maintain
Subclavian Vein

When to use it
–
–
–

May be better for long term access
Obese – clavicle gives you a landmark
Shock – less likely to collapse
Relative contraindications
–
–
Trauma to the area
Coagulopathic
Subclavian Anatomy



Begins as axillary vein,
eventually joins the IJ
to become the
inominate or
brachiocephalic
Anterior scalene
separates the SCA from
SCV
Most common is
infraclavicular approach
Positioning



Head down 15-30
degrees
Rolled towel placed
longitudinally between
scapulae
Tilt head toward side of
catheterization
–
Reduced catheter
malposition in infants
Quiz Question

What is the anatomic landmark on the
clavicle where you insert the needle?
–
–
–
–
A. 1 cm below the junction of the middle and
lateral thirds of the clavicle
B. 1 cm below the junction of the middle and
medial thirds of the clavicle
C. 1 cm below the middle third of the clavicle
D. 1 cm below the lateral third of the clavicle
Quiz Answer

What is the anatomic
landmark on the
clavicle where you
insert the needle?
–
B. 1 cm below the
junction of the middle
and medial thirds of the
clavicle
Procedure




Needle inserted 1 cm below
junction of middle and
medial thirds of the clavicle
Marched down clavicle and
parallel to frontal plane
Bevel directed caudal
Blood flash during insertion
or withdrawal
Procedure

Regular Seldinger
technique

Watch for dysrhythmias
with wire insertion
Confirmation



Position should be in
the distal SVC
FDA – “the catheter tip
should not be placed in
or allowed to migrate
into the heart”
34% mortality rate with
CVC related pericardial
effusions in pediatrics
Complications






Inability to cannulate
SCA puncture/cannulation
Catheter misplacement
Pneumothorax
Hemothorax
Nerve injury
Complications


100 patients - 1/3 of patients <1 year
92% overall success rate
–

89% in emergencies
Major complications
–
4 pneumothorax, 2 BSI
Venkataraman, et al. J peds 1998;113:480-5.
Site Selection
Site
Pro’s
Subclavian  Large vessel
 Can tolerate
high flow
 Dressing easy
to maintain
 Less
restrictive for
patient
 Lowest sepsis
rate
11/6/2015
Con’s
 Close to lung
apex, risk of
pneumothorax
 Close to
subclavian
artery
 Hard to control
bleeding
Internal Jugular Vein

When to use it
–
–
–
–

High rate of success
Compressible if coagulopathic
Lung hyperinflation (less likely to get
pneumothorax than subclavian)
Transvenous pacing via RIJ
Relative contraindications
–
–
Ongoing CPR – difficult to access
Cervical trauma/increased ICP
Internal Jugular Anatomy


Lateral to carotid artery
in sheath
Beneath the triangle
formed by the sternal
and clavicular heads of
the SCM and the
clavicle
Quiz Question

All of the following are correct about a left internal
jugular cannulation EXCEPT:
–
–
–
–
A. LIJ has a more acute angle at connection with
subclavian
B. Lower pneumothorax risk compared to right because
right pleural dome is higher
C. Lymphatic duct adjacent to junction of LIJ and
innominate vein
D. Reduced risk of carotid puncture because of its caudocephalad structure
Quiz answer



B is the correct answer to the question
Reasons to go right –
The left has :
–
–
–
More acute angle at connection with subclavian
Left pleural dome is higher (more pneumothorax
risk)
Lymphatic duct adjacent to junction of LIJ and
innominate
Internal Jugular Positioning



Trendelenberg 15-30
degrees
Shoulder roll
Head turned away from
side of insertion
Procedure – Median approach



Needle insertion –
approximately one half
the distance between
the mastoid and the
sternal notch
20-30 degree needle
angle
Seldinger technique –
watch for dysrhythmias
Posterior Approach
Anterior Approach
Procedure

Finder needle
techniques
–
Consider when:




Poor landmarks (obese)
Coagulopathic
Carotid artery disease
in adults
Ultrasound
Ultrasound Image of Right Neck
Correct IJ placement
CXR provided by Jeremy P. Feldman, MD
E-Bay Fellow in Pulmonary Vascular Disease
Complications



Arterial puncture more common than
subclavian
Pneumo/hemo thorax very rare
Catheter malpositioning similar to subclavian
Site Selection
Pro’s
Con’s
Large vessel
Easily located
Easy access
Short, straight
path to
superior vena
cava
 Decreased risk
of
pneumothorax
 Uncomfortable
for patient
 Difficult to
maintain
dressing
 Close to
carotid artery
 Easily
contaminated
 Difficult
maintenance
with trach or
neck injury
Site
Internal
Jugular




11/6/2015
Axillary Vein






Find axillary artery
Get PIV just inferior to it in axillary vein
Wire it up
Appropriate size catheter?
226 neonates done with 9 failures
47 critically ill kids (14d-9y)
–

79% cannulation rate
Rare complications – similar thrombosis rates to
subclavian and internal jugular
Temporary Dialysis Catheters

We have available :
–
–
–
–
–
7 French Triple Lumen regular CVL
7 French 10 cm Double Lumen Medcomp
8 French 9cm Double Lumen Mahurkar
12 French 13 cm Triple Lumen Mahurkar
12 French 20 cm Triple Lumen Mahurkar
PATIENT SIZE
CATHETER SIZE &
SITE OF INSERTION
SOURCE
NEONATE
Single-lumen 5 Fr (COOK)
Femoral artery or vein
Dual-Lumen 7.0 French
Femoral vein
(COOK/MEDCOMP)
3-6 KG
6-30 KG
>15-KG
>30 KG
>30 KG
Dual-Lumen 7.0 French
Internal/External-Jugular,
(COOK/MEDCOMP)
Subclavian or Femoral vein
Triple-Lumen 7.0 Fr
Internal/External-Jugular,
(MEDCOMP)
Subclavian or Femoral vein
Dual-Lumen 8.0 French
Internal/External-Jugular,
(KENDALL, ARROW)
Subclavian or Femoral vein
Dual-Lumen 9.0 French
Internal/External-Jugular,
(MEDCOMP)
Subclavian or Femoral vein
Dual-Lumen 10.0 French
Internal/External-Jugular,
(ARROW, KENDALL)
Subclavian or Femoral vein
Triple-Lumen 12.5 French
Internal/External-Jugular,
(ARROW, KENDALL)
Subclavian or Femoral vein
Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT: Pros
and Cons of Femoral Site
PROS

Relatively larger vessel may
allow for
–
–



larger catheter
higher flows
Ease of placement
No risk of pneumothorax
Preserve potential future
vessels for chronic HD
CONS



Shorter femoral catheters with
increased % recirculation
Poor performance in patients
with ascites/increased abdominal
pressure
Trauma to venous anastamosis
site for future transplant
Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT: Pros
and Cons of IJ/SCV Site
PROS



CONS
Tip placement in right atrium  SCV stenosis (SCV)
decreases recirculation
 Superior vena cava
Not affected by ascites
syndrome
Preserve potential vein
needed for transplant
 Risk of pneumothorax in

patients with high PEEP
Trauma to veins needed
potentially for future HD
access
Femoral versus IJ catheter performance

26 femoral
–
–



19 > 20 cm
7 < 20cm
13 IJ
Qb 250 ml/min (ultrasound dilution)
Recirculation measurement by ultrasound
dilution method
Little et al: AJKD 36:1135-9, 2000
Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
Type
Number
Qb (ml/min)
Recirculation(%)
95% CI
26
237.1
13.1*
7.6 to 18.6
> 20cm
19
233.3
8.5**
2.9 to 13.7
< 20cm
7
247.5
26.3**
17.1 to 35.5
13
226.4
0.4*
-0.1 to 1.0
Femoral
Jugular
* p<0.001
** p<0.007
Little et al: AJKD 36:1135-9, 2000
Femoral versus IJ catheter performance:
Pediatrics
250
219
174
200
150
103 102
118 119
IJ/SC
Femoral
100
50
3
4
0
BFR
Venous P Arterial P % Recirc
(mls/min) (mm Hg) (mm Hg)
(Gardner et al, CRRT 1997
Quinton 8 Fr; n = 20; 120 Treatments)
P value
NS
NS
NS
NS