Countdown to 2015: Vietnam Add presenter name Date Event/location Notes for the presenter on adapting this presentation • Personalise with photos, charts • Data presented are based.
Download ReportTranscript Countdown to 2015: Vietnam Add presenter name Date Event/location Notes for the presenter on adapting this presentation • Personalise with photos, charts • Data presented are based.
Countdown to 2015: Vietnam Add presenter name Date Event/location Notes for the presenter on adapting this presentation • Personalise with photos, charts • Data presented are based on best available data up to mid-2014. When presenting, mention more recent studies or data. (2013 mortality on slide #18 added) • Select which slides are appropriate for the audience. For example: Slides are provided for each figure presented in the country profile; select from these (choosing all or a few depending on needs) • Sub-national data can be substituted as appropriate and available • Review the Speaker Notes, adapt according to your audience and purpose Purpose of this presentation • To stimulate discussion about Vietnam country data, especially about progress, where we lag behind, and where there are opportunities to scale up • To provide some background about Countdown to 2015 for MNCH, the indicators, and data sources in the country profiles • To showcase the country profile as a tool for monitoring progress, sharing information and improving accountability Outline 1. Countdown to 2015: Background 2. Vietnam Countdown profile Part I Countdown to 2015: Background What is Countdown? A global movement initiated in 2003 that tracks progress in maternal, newborn & child health in the 75 highest burden countries to promote action and accountability Countdown aims • To disseminate the best and most recent information on country-level progress • To take stock of progress and propose new actions • To hold governments, partners and donors accountable wherever progress is lacking What does Countdown do? • Analyze country-level coverage and trends for interventions proven to reduce maternal, newborn and child mortality • Track indicators for determinants of coverage (policies and health system strength; financial flows; equity) • Identify knowledge and data gaps across the RMNCH continuum of care • Conduct research and analysis • Support country-level Countdowns • Produce materials, organize global conferences and develop web site to share findings 9 75 countries that together account for > 95% of maternal and child deaths worldwide Who is Countdown? • Individuals: scientists/academics, policymakers, public health workers, communications experts, teachers… • Governments: RMNCH policymakers, members of Parliament… • Organizations: NGOs, UN agencies, health care professional associations, donors, medical journals… 12 Countdown moving forward Four streams of work to promote accountability, 2011-2015 • Responsive to global accountability frameworks -Annual reporting on 11 indicators for the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women’s and Children’s Health (COIA) -Contribute to follow-up of A Promise Renewed/Call to Action • Production of country profiles/report and global event(s) • Cross-cutting analyses • Country-level engagement Part 2 Vietnam Countdown country profile Main findings data on the profile WhatRange doesofCountdown monitor? • Progress in coverage for critical interventions across reproductive, maternal, newborn & child health continuum of care • Health Systems and Policies – important context for assessing coverage gains • Financial flows to reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health • Equity in intervention coverage Sources of data The national-level profile uses data from global databases: • Population-based household surveys • UNICEF-supported MICS • USAID-supported DHS • Other national-level household surveys (MIS, RHS and others) • Provide disaggregated data - by household wealth, urbanrural residence, gender, educational attainment and geographic location • Interagency adjusted estimates U5MR, MMR, immunization, water/sanitation • Other data sources (e.g. administrative data, country reports on policy and systems indicators, country health accounts, and global reporting on external resource flows etc.) National progress towards MDGs 4 & 5 Mortality data through 2012: 2013 child mortality data was released in late 2014: Under-five mortality rate (U5MR)= 24 deaths per 1000 live births Infant mortality rate (IMR) = 19 deaths per 1000 live births Neonatal mortality rate (NMR) = 13 deaths per 1000 live births Why do SE Asian Causemothers of deathdie? Leading direct causes: Haemorrhage – 30% Hypertension –15% Embolism – 12% Abortion – 7% Sepsis – 6% Understanding the cause of death distribution is important for program development and monitoring Vi et Nam Why do Vietnamese children die? DEMOGRAPHICS Cau Causes of under-five deaths, 2012 Pneumonia Leading causes: Neonatal – 54% Pneumonia – 9% Diarrhoea – 7% Injuries – 4% Measles – 2% HIV/AIDS – 1% 9% 4% Preterm 20% Other 24% Neonatal death: 54% HIV/AIDS 1% Globally nearly half of child deaths are attributable to undernutrition Asphyxia* 7% Other 6% Malaria 0% Injuries 4% Sepsis** 5% Measles 2% 7% Diarrhoea * Intrapartum-related events Congenital 13% 0% Source: WHO/CHERG 2014 ** Sepsis/ Tetanus/ Meningitis/ Encephalitis MATERNAL AND NEWBORN HEALTH Undernutrition is Antenatal a major underlying cause of child care Percent women aged 15-49 years attended at least once by a deaths skilled health provider during pregnancy Dema Anten Demographics Countdown to 2015 Report. 2014. Variable coverage along the continuum of care Maternal and newborn health Maternal and newborn health Diarrhoea * Intrapartum-related events Source: WHO/CHERG 2014 ** Sepsis/ Tetanus/ Meningitis/ Encephalitis Maternal and newborn health MATERNAL AND NEWBORN HEALTH Antenatal care Demand fo Percent women aged 15-49 years attended at least once by a skilled health provider during pregnancy Antenatal c 100 Percent 80 86 71 91 94 Malaria du treatment C-section r 68 (Minimum ta 60 Neonatal t 40 Postnatal v (within 2 day 20 Postnatal v (within 2 day 0 1997 DHS 2000 MICS 2002 DHS 2006 MICS 2011 MICS Women wi (<18.5 kg/m2 alitis birthw Other maternal and newborn health indicators EALTH Anten mana Demand for family planning satisfied (%) 95 (2011) Antenatal care (4 or more visits, %) 60 (2011) 1 (2006) 20, 31, 16 (2011) Low o mana 91 (2012) - - SYS Malaria during pregnancy - intermittent preventive treatment (%) 4 C-section rate (total, urban, rural; %) (Minimum target is 5% and maximum target is 15%) Neonatal tetanus vaccine Postnatal visit for baby (within 2 days for home births, %) Postnatal visit for mother - - - - (within 2 days for home births, %) 11 CS Women with low body mass index (<18.5 kg/m2, %) Countdown to 2015 Report. 2014. Intern Breas Comm with a Coste plan(s child h Life Sa Repr Mate Child health Child health DHS MICS DHS MICS MICS (<18.5 kg/m Child health CHILD HEALTH Percent of children <5 years with diarrhoea: receiving oral rehydration therapy/increased fluids with continued feeding treated with ORS Percent those re Perce 100 80 60 40 20 0 65 40 57 40 47 26 24 11 1997 DHS 2000 MICS 2002 DHS 2006 MICS WATER AND SANITATION 2011 MICS Percent Mala Percent Diarrhoeal disease treatment 100 80 60 40 20 0 MICS Reprod Matern (<18.5 kg/m2, %) Child health Newbor Child he Malaria prevention and treatment Percent children receiving first line treatment among those receiving any antimalarial Percent children < 5 years sleeping under ITNs 42 (2011) Density o midwives National Obstetric 57 47 2011 MICS Percent (% of recom 100 80 60 40 20 0 FINA 16 2000 MICS 13 2005 Other NS 9 2011 MICS Per capit health (In General on healt expendit Out of po expendit Child health Child health DHS MICS DHS MICS MICS Water and sanitation WATER AND SANITATION Improved drinking water coverage Improved Percent of population by type of drinking water source, 1990-2012 Piped on premises Other improved Surface water Unimproved Percent of pop Improved f Unimprove 1 4 100 16 18 22 47 80 39 28 69 85 53 61 9 9 0 2012 Total Source: WHO/UNICEF JMP 2014 22 40 2 20 37 26 1990 60 54 43 20 0 100 37 60 40 2 4 Percent Percent 80 20 6 4 1990 2012 1990 Urban 2012 0 1990 Rural Source: WHO/UN MICS MICS MICS Out of pocke expenditure Water and sanitation Reproductiv and child he Improved sanitation coverage 990-2012 Rural Other NS 2 4 Percent of population by type of sanitation facility, 1990-2012 Improved facilities Shared facilities Open defecation Unimproved facilities 100 2 19 85 Percent 80 39 60 2012 4 93 75 26 43 8 4 Out-of-po 3 5 22 40 2 20 9 4 24 0 2 External s General g 24 37 67 31 0 1990 2012 Total Source: WHO/UNICEF JMP 2014 1990 2012 Urban ODA to child ODA to mate per live birth Note: See annex 2 64 Other 1990 2012 Rural MNCH policies • NO - Maternity protection in accordance with Convention 183 • NO - Specific notifications of maternal deaths • -- - Midwifery personnel authorized to administer core set of life saving interventions • YES - International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes • YES - Postnatal home visits in first week of life • NO - Community treatment of pneumonia with antibiotics • YES - Low osmolarity ORS and zinc for diarrhoea management • - Rotavirus vaccine • - Pneumococcal vaccine Systems and financing for MNCH • Costed national implementation plans for MNCH: Partial (2013) • Density of doctors, nurses and midwives (per 10,000 population): 23.0 (2011) • National availability of EmOC services: - (% of recommended minimum) • Per capita total expenditure on health (Int$): $233 (2012) • Government spending on health: 9% (2012) (as % of total govt spending) • Out-of-pocket spending on health: 49% (2012) (as % of total health spending) • Official development assistance to child health per child (US$): $9 (2011) • Official development assistance to maternal and newborn health per live birth (US$): $33 (2011) Who is left behind? Vietnam The wide bars for many indicators show important inequalities in coverage. Inequality is greatest for skilled birth attendant, antenatal care and DTP3. ORT, careseeking for pneumonia, and vitamin A show much smaller gaps in coverage. Thank you! Optional additional slides Equity profiles Vietnam Coverage levels in poorest and richest quintiles Coverage levels in the 5 wealth quintiles Co-coverage of health interventions Composite coverage and coverage gap