Electronic Liquid Crystals Novel Phases of Electrons in Two Dimensions Alan Dorsey University of Florida Collaborators: Leo Radzihovsky (U Colorado) Carlos Wexler (U Missouri) Mouneim Ettouhami (UF) Support.

Download Report

Transcript Electronic Liquid Crystals Novel Phases of Electrons in Two Dimensions Alan Dorsey University of Florida Collaborators: Leo Radzihovsky (U Colorado) Carlos Wexler (U Missouri) Mouneim Ettouhami (UF) Support.

Electronic Liquid Crystals
Novel Phases of Electrons in Two Dimensions
Alan Dorsey
University of Florida
Collaborators:
Leo Radzihovsky (U Colorado)
Carlos Wexler (U Missouri)
Mouneim Ettouhami (UF)
Support from the NSF
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
1
Competing interactions
•Long range repulsive
force: uniform phase
•Short range attractive
force: compact structures
•Competition between
forcesinhomogeneous
phase.
•Ferromagnetic films,
ferrofluids, type-I
superconductors, block
copolymers
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
2
Ferrofluid in a Hele-Shaw cell
•Ferrofluid: colloid of 1
micron spheres. Fluid
becomes magnetized
in an applied field.
•Hele-Shaw cell:
ferrofluid between two
glass plates
Surface tension competes with dipole-dipole interaction…
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
3
Results courtesy of Ken Cooper
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~jpelab/Ken_web_page/ferrofluid.html
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
4
Modulated phases
Langmuir monolayer
(phospholipid and cholesterol)
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
Ferromagnetic film
(magnetic garnet)
5
Liquid crystals
T
smectic-C
4 December 2003
smectic-A
nematic
NYU Colloquium
isotropic
6
Outline
•Overview of the two dimensional electron
gas and the quantum Hall effect
•Theoretical and experimental evidence for a
charge density wave?
•Liquid crystal physics in quantum Hall
systems—smectics and nematics
•Quantum theory of the nematic phase
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
7
Two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG)
AlGaAs
B
ne  2.271011 cm-2
3
2
1
N=0
EF
• Created in GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures
• Magnetic field quantizes electron motion into highly
degenerate Landau levels
EN  c ( N  1/ 2), c  19 K/T
• Magnetic length
lb   / eB  2.56106 cm/T1/2
• Experiments at
kBT  c , Ec , EF
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
8
The quantum Hall effect
• Filling fraction (per spin):
# electrons Ne(h / e) hne



# states
BA
eB
xy  (e / h) , h / e2  25,812
2
• State of the art mobility
reveals interaction effects
  107 cm2 / V s
• No Hall effect at half filling
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
9
Charge density wave in 2D?
CDWs proposed by
Fukuyama et al. (1979) as
the ground state of a partially
filled LL, but the Laughlin
liquid has a lower energy.
What happens in higher LLs
(lower magnetic fields)?
Hartree-Fock [Fogler et al. (1996)] predicts a CDW in
higher LLs. Shown to be exact by Moessner and
Chalker (1996).
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
10
Hartree-Fock treatment of CDW
• Direct vs. exchange balance leads to stripes or bubbles
 j j ( x)  Tˆ j ( x)
  V ( y  x)  ( y) ( y) j ( x)   V ( y  x)  ( y) ( x) j ( y)
y
y
direct or “Hartree” term
exchange or “Fock” term
• Direct: repulsive long range
Coulomb interaction
• Exchange: attractive short
range interaction
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
11
Experimental evidence
dc transport: Lilly et al. (1999)
4 December 2003
Microwave conductivity: R.
Lewis & L. Engel (NHMFL)
NYU Colloquium
12
Experimental details
• Anisotropy can be
reoriented with an inplane field (new
features at 5/2, 7/2)
• Transition at 100 mK
• “Easy” direction [110]
• “Native” anisotropy
energy about 1 mK
• No QHE:
“compressible” state
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
13
A charge density wave?
• Transport anisotropy
consistent with CDW state
• BUT:
• Transport in static CDW would
be too anisotropic
•Formation energy of several K,
not mK
•Data also consistent with an
anisotropic liquid
Fluctuations must be important [Fradkin&Kivelson (1999),
MacDonald&Fisher (2000)]!
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
14
The quantum Hall smectic
• Classical smectic is a
“layered liquid”
•Stripe fluctuations lead to a
“quantum Hall smectic”
• Wexler&ATD (2001): find
elastic properties from HFA
H smectic   d 2 r [B( y u ) 2  K ( 2x u ) 2   -1 ( ) 2 ]
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
15
Order in two dimensions
Problem: in 2D phonons destroy the positional order
but preserve the orientational order. However, this
ignores dislocations (=half a layer inserted into crystal).
• Topological character.
• Dislocation energy in a
smectic is finite, there will be
a nonzero density.
nd  d2  a 2e Ed / T
• Dislocations further reduce
the orientational order.
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
16
The quantum Hall nematic
• Dislocations “melt” the smectic [Toner&Nelson (1982)].
H nematic   d 2 r[ K1 (  n) 2  K 3 (  n) 2  (h  n) 2 ]
• Algebraic orientational order:
4 December 2003
e
NYU Colloquium
i 2 ( r ) i 2 ( 0)
e
r
2T / K
17
Nematic to isotropic transition
•Low temperature phase is better
described as a nematic [Cooper
et al (2001)]. Local stripe order
persists at high temperatures.
•Nematic to isotropic transition
occurs via a disclination
unbinding (Kosterlitz-Thouless)
transition.
• Wexler&ATD: start from HFA
and find transition at 200 mK, vs.
70-100 mK in experiments.
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
18
Quantum theory of the QHN
• Classical theory
overestimates
anisotropy below 20 mK.
Are quantum
fluctuations the culprit?
• Quantum fluctuations
can unbind dislocations
at T=0.
Radzihovsky&ATD (PRL, 2002): use dynamics of local
smectic layers as a guide. Make contact with hydrodynamics.
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
19
Theoretical digression…
• The collective degrees of freedom are the rotations of
the dislocation-free domains (nematogens). Their
angular momenta Lz and directors n are conjugate.
• Commutation relations are derived in the high field
limit, and lead to an unusual quantum rotor model.
• Broken rotational symmetry leads to a Goldstone mode
with anisotropic dispersion:
 (q)  lb2  1qx2 K1qx2  K3q y2  h 2
3
• Note that  ~ q
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
20
Predictions
• QHN exhibits true long range order at zero
temperature; quantum fluctuations important below
20 mK.
• QHN unstable to weak disorder. Glass phase?
• Tunneling probes low energy excitations. See a
pseudogap at low bias.
• Damping of Goldstone mode due to coupling to
quasiparticles.
• Resistivity anisotropy proportional to nematic order
parameter [conjectured by Fradkin et al. (2000)].
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
21
New directions
• Start from half-filled fermi liquid
state. Can interactions cause the
FS to spontaneously deform?
• Variational wavefunctions?
• Experimental probes: tunneling,
magnetic focusing, surface
acoustic waves.
• Relation to nanoscale phase
separation in other systems (e.g.,
cuprate superconductors)?
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
ky
kx
ky
kx
22
Summary
Fascinating problem of orientationally ordered point particles!
4 December 2003
NYU Colloquium
23