Status of Medium-energy Electron Ion Collider (MEIC) Design Vasiliy Morozov on behalf of MEIC Study Group JLab Users Group Meeting, June 3, 2015
Download ReportTranscript Status of Medium-energy Electron Ion Collider (MEIC) Design Vasiliy Morozov on behalf of MEIC Study Group JLab Users Group Meeting, June 3, 2015
Status of Medium-energy Electron Ion Collider (MEIC) Design Vasiliy Morozov on behalf of MEIC Study Group JLab Users Group Meeting, June 3, 2015 Outline EIC Science highlights and design strategies for the MEIC at JLAB MEIC baseline design − Overview of collider complex components − Detector integration − Electron cooling − Polarization − Machine performance − R&D overview Summary and Outlook IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 2 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 22 MEIC Timeline and context MEIC design (10+ years) Physics case and machine requirements defined by White Paper (2011) Preliminary conceptual design report (2012) Design optimization, EICAC reviews, internal reviews NSAC/LRP process starts (2014) NASC/LRP Cost Review (January 2015) Final design optimizations (February-June 2015) baseline Pre-project R&D planning and execution (2015-2017) Conceptual Design Report planning and execution (2015-2017) GOAL: Ready for CD1 and down-select IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 3 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 33 Electron Ion Collider NSAC 2007 Long-Range Plan: “An Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) with polarized beams has been embraced by the U.S. nuclear science community as embodying the vision for reaching the next QCD frontier. EIC would provide unique capabilities for the study of QCD well beyond those available at existing facilities worldwide and complementary to those planned for the next generation of accelerators in Europe and Asia.” EIC Community White Paper arXiv:1212.1701 IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 4 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 44 EIC Physics Highlights An EIC will study the sea quark and gluon-dominated matter – 3D structure of nucleons How do gluons and quarks bind into 3D hadrons? – Role of orbital motion and gluon dynamics in the proton spin Why do quarks contribute only ~30%? – Gluons in nuclei (splitting/recombining) Does the gluon density saturate at small x? Need luminosity, polarization and good acceptance to detect spectator & fragments IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 5 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 55 Why Jefferson Lab? Large established user community in the field CEBAF, the world highest energy SRF linac, as a full energy injector A Green Field new ion complex and two new collider rings provide opportunity for a modern design for highest performance Design meets experimental needs – – – – – Broad CM energy range Wide range of ion species Full-acceptance detectors High luminosity High polarization CEBAF center IP IP Low technical risk – Design largely based on conventional technologies IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 6 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June CEBAF 66 MEIC MEIC Design Overview √s from 15 to 65 GeV: 3 -10 GeV electrons, 20 -100 GeV protons Polarized light ions (p, d, 3He, Li) & unpolarized light to heavy ions (Au, Pb) Up to 2 detectors including a full-acceptance primary detector Luminosity of 1033 to 1034 cm-2s-1 per IP in a broad CM energy range >70% longitudinal e- polarization & transverse/longitudinal ion polarization Possibility of upgrade to higher energies and luminosity possible Cold Ion Collider Ring (8 to 100 GeV) PEP-II components Superferric magnets Warm Electron Collider Ring (3 to 10 GeV) IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 7 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 77 Design Strategy for High Luminosity The MEIC design concept for high luminosity is based on high bunch repetition rate CW colliding beams KEK-B already reached above 2x1034 /cm2/s Beam Design • High repetition rate • Low bunch charge • Short bunch length • Small emittance IR Design • Small β* • Crab crossing Damping • Synchrotron radiation • Electron cooling n1n2 n1n2 L f ~f * 4 x y y “Traditional” hadrons colliders • Small number of bunches • Small collision frequency f • Large bunch charge n1 and n2 • Long bunch length • Large beta-star IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 8 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 88 Design Strategy for High Polarization The MEIC design concept for high luminosity is based on unique figure-8 shape ring structure – Spin precession in one arc is exactly cancelled in the other – Zero spin tune independent of energy – Spin control and stabilization with small solenoids or other compact spin rotators B B Advantages Efficient preservation of ion polarization during acceleration • Energy-independent spin tune The only practical way to accommodate polarized deuterons • Small anomalous magnetic moment Ease of spin manipulation • Any desired polarization at IP • Spin flip Strong reduction of electron depolarization due to the energy independent spin tune IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 9 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 99 CEBAF - Full Energy Injector CEBAF fixed target program – 5-pass recirculating SRF linac – Exciting science program beyond 2025 – Can be operated concurrently with the MEIC e- collider ring CEBAF will provide for MEIC – – – – IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 10 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June Up to 12 GeV electron beam High repetition rate (up to 1497 MHz) High polarization (>85%) Good beam quality 10 10 Electron Collider Ring Beam characteristics Electron collider ring design – Circumference of 2154.28 m = 2 x 754.84 m arcs + 2 x 322.3 m straights – Reuses PEP-II magnets, vacuum chambers and RF Arc, 261.7 – 3A beam current up to 6.95 GeV – Synchrotron radiation power density 10kW/m – Total power 10 MW e- 81.7 Future 2nd IP IP: x,y*=(10,2)cm Forward e- detection IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 11 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 11 11 Ion Sources and Linac QWR QWR HWR 4 cryostats 4 cryos 2 2 cryos 1010 cryostats cryos RFQ Ion Sources IH MEBT Optimum lead stripping energy: 13 MeV/u ABPIS for polarized or un-polarized light ions, EBIS and/or ECR for un-polarized heavy ions Linac design based on the ANL linac design. Pulsed linac capably of accelerating multiple charge ion species (H- to Pb67+) – Warm Linac sections (115 MHz) RFQ (3 m) MEBT (3 m) IH structure (9 m) – Cold Linac sections QWR + QWR (24 + 12 m) Stripper, chicane (10 m) HWR section (60 m) 115 MHz 115 MHz 230 MHz IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 12 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June Ion species: p to Pb Ion species for the reference design 208Pb Kinetic energy (p, Pb) 285 MeV 100 MeV/u Maximum pulse current: Light ions (A/Q<3) Heavy ions (A/Q>3) 2 mA 0.5 mA Pulse repetition rate up to 10 Hz Pulse length: Light ions (A/Q<3) Heavy ions (A/Q>3) 0.50 ms 0.25 ms Maximum beam pulsed power 680 kW Fundamental frequency 115 MHz Total length 121 m 12 12 Booster Purpose of Booster Ekin = 285 MeV – 8 GeV – Accumulation of ions injected from Linac – Cooling – Acceleration of ions – Extraction and transfer of ions to the collider ring Crossing angle: 75 deg. 7 BETA_X&Y[m] 70 injection -7 DISP_X&Y[m] M56 273 cm 0 – Based on super-ferric magnet technology – Circumference of 273 m – Achromatic arcs’ design with partly negative horizontal dispersion to minimize momentum compaction to avoid transition crossing – Figure-8 shape for preserving ion polarization extraction RF cavity 8 GeV Booster design 0 BETA_XBETA_YDISP_X DISP_Y Inj. Arc (2550) IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 13 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 272.306 Straight 13 13 Arc (2550) Straight (RF + extraction) Ion Collider Ring Layout Ion collider ring design – match the geometry of PEP-II-component-based electron ring – Use Super-ferric magnets ~3 T maximum field for maximum proton momentum of 100 GeV/c, 4.5 k operating temperature Cost effective construction and operation (factor of ~2 cheaper to operate, GSI) 81.7 Arc, 261.7 Future 2nd IP ions IP: x,y*=(10,2)cm IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 14 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 14 14 Full-Acceptance Detector 50 mrad crossing angle: improved detection, no parasitic collisions, fast beam separation Forward hadron detection in three stages – Endcap – Small dipole covering angles up to a few degrees – Far forward, up to one degree, for particles passing through accelerator quads Low-Q2 tagger – Small-angle electron detection small angle hadron detection (from GEANT4) low-Q2 electron detection ion quads large-aperture electron quads EM calorimeter + TORCH? n, g p e Fixed trackers Thin exit windows Endcap EM calorimeter e/π threshold Cherenkov EM calorimeter dual-solenoid in common cryostat 4 m coil RICH Tracking FP ~60 mrad bend central detector with endcaps barrel DIRC + TOF far forward hadron detection small-diameter electron quads 50 mrad beam (crab) crossing angle p IP 1m 1 m Ion quadrupoles 2 Tm dipole Electron quadrupoles Trackers and “donut” calorimeter IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 15 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 15 15 Roman pots Far-Forward Detection Performance • Neutrals detected in a 25 mrad (total) cone down to zero degrees Space for large (> 1 m diameter) Hcal + Emcal • Excellent acceptance for all ion fragments • Recoil baryon acceptance: up to 99.5% of beam energy for all angles down to at least 2-3 mrad for all momenta full acceptance for x > 0.005 • Resolution limited only by beam longitudinal p/p ~ 310-4 angular ~ 0.2 mrad n, g 2 Tm dipole 20 Tm dipole p solenoid e • 15 MeV/c resolution for 50GeV/u tagged deuteron beam IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 16 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 16 16 Multi-Step Electron Cooling Cooling of ion beams in the MEIC is critical for delivering high luminosity over a broad CM energy range 2 g – Help accumulation of positive ions cool ~ g z 4d – Reduce the emittance g – Maintain the emittance ion sources ion linac DC cooler BB cooler Booster (0.285 to 8 GeV) Ring Cooler Booster ring DC Collider ring Bunched Beam Cooling Ion energy Electron energy GeV/u MeV 0.11 ~ 0.19 (injection) 0.062 ~ 0.1 Emittance reduction 2 1.1 Maintain emittance during stacking 7.9 (injection) 4.3 Maintain emittance Up to 100 Up to 55 Function Accumulation of positive ions IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 17 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June collider ring (8 to 100 GeV) ion bunch Cooling section solenoid electron bunch energy recovery SRF Linac dump injector 17 17 Ion Polarization in Booster No special care is needed for ion polarization before the booster – highly polarized ion source + no polarization loss in the linac Polarization in Booster stabilized and preserved by a single weak solenoid – 0.7 Tm at 9 GeV/c – d / p = 0.003 / 0.01 Longitudinal polarization in the straight with the solenoid Comparison: Conventional 9 GeV accelerators require B||L of ~30 Tm for protons and ~110 Tm for deuterons BIIL Booster beam from Linac to Collider Ring IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 18 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 18 18 Ion Polarization in Collider Ring “3D spin rotator” rotates the spin about any chosen direction in 3D and sets the stable polarization orientation S (nx , n y , nz ) – Maximum B of 3 T and B|| of 3.6 T => d / p = 0.00025 / 0.01 Spin-control solenoids Lattice quadrupoles Radial-field dipoles Vertical-field dipoles Placement of 3D spin rotator in the collider ring Another 3D spin rotator suppresses the zero-integer spin resonance ion IP IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 19 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 19 19 Electron Polarization Electron polarization design: – – – – – Vertically polarized (>85%) electron beam from CEBAF Vertical polarization in the arcs and longitudinal at collision points Spin rotator for the polarization rotation Compton polarimeter provides non-invasive continuous measurement of polarization Average electron polarization reaches above 70% Polarization Configuration Magnetic field Polarization e- IP Laser + Fabry Perot cavity Photon calorimeter Low-Q2 tagger for highenergy electrons gc Low-Q2 tagger for low-energy electrons Compton Polarimeter Electron tracking detector e- beam Energy (GeV) 3 5 7 9 10 Estimated Pol. Lifetime (hours) 66 5.2 2.2 1.3 0.8 IP IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 20 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 20 20 e-p Collision Luminosity Luminosity (1033 cm-2s-1) 1034 12 A full acceptance detector 1034 10 (baseline) A high luminosity detector 8 e: 4 GeV P: 75 GeV 6 4 e: 4 GeV P: 50 GeV 2 0 1033 e: 4 GeV P: 30 GeV 20 e: 10 GeV P: 100 GeV e: 5 GeV P: 100 GeV 30 40 50 60 CM energy (GeV) IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 21 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 21 21 70 Overview of R&D Prototypes – Development and testing of 1.2m 3T SF magnets for MEIC ion ring and booster Collaboration with Texas A&M , FY15-16 – Crab cavity development (collaboration with ODU, leveraging R&D for LHC / LARP crab) – 952 MHz Cavity development, FY15-17 Design optimization/Modeling – Optimization of conceptual design of MEIC ion linac Collaboration with ANL and/or FRIB, FY 15-17 – Optimization of Integration of detector and interaction region design, detector background, non-linear beam dynamics, PEP-II components Collaboration with SLAC, FY 12-17 – Feasibility study of an experimental demonstration of cooling of ions using a bunched electron beam Collaboration with Institute of Modern Physics, China – Studies and simulations on preservation and manipulation of ion polarization in a figure8 storage ring Collaboration with A. Kondratenko, FY 13-15 – Algorithm and code development for electron cooling simulation, FY 15-16 IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 22 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 22 22 Summary and Outlook MEIC is a ring-ring collider project with mature design – Luminosities from 1033 up to 1034 cm-2s-1 in a broad CM energy range – Beam polarizations over 70% – Low technical risk MEIC design meets the nuclear physics community requirements R&D work continues Cost and performance optimization continues MEIC design upgradable in energy and luminosity IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 23 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 23 23 MEIC Collaboration IPAC’15, Richmond, May 5, 2015 24 3, 2015 JLab Users Group Meeting, June 24 24