Successes, Failures and Lessons Learned: Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in South and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program Alma Aty, MoP-2, May 27, 2005
Download ReportTranscript Successes, Failures and Lessons Learned: Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in South and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program Alma Aty, MoP-2, May 27, 2005
Successes, Failures and Lessons Learned: Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in South and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program Alma Aty, MoP-2, May 27, 2005 Content • Introduction • Achievements in SEE • Successes, problems, remaining challenges • Lessons learned www.rec.org The Aarhus Convention: An instrument for major breakthrough in citizens’ rights Aarhus Convention • Ratified by Albania, Bulgaria, FYR Macedonia, Romania • Signed by Croatia and BIH • In process of accession: Serbia and Montenegro • Special situation: Kosovo (UNMIK) • Process reinforced by EU, ratification and new directives and accession efforts www.rec.org Achievements in SEE Complex and strategic approach: • Assessment of status, needs and priorities • Developing strategies and action plans • Combination of technical assistance and different capacity building methods • Regional, national and local activities • Building synergies with other processes (EU accession) • Integrating Aarhus Convention provisions in different sectors (e.g.: environment and water, waste, energy, etc.) www.rec.org Successes, Problems and Remaining Challenges in SEE • All countries made substantial progress • Legislative framework for pillars AI and PP mostly in place but for third pillar incomplete in some countries • EU candidate countries: only small gaps in legislation • SEE: General laws are there but implementing regulations procedures, mechanisms are missing www.rec.org Successes, Problems and Remaining Challenges: Access to Environmental Information • Institutional/practical mechanisms • • • • • • EU candidate countries: in place but need further improvements • In other SEE countries often missing Good examples: Bulgaria, Romania, Macedonia Detailed procedures for providing access and active dissemination missing in many countries Conflict between horizontal and special laws No common requirements/ guidance on interpretation of confidentiality Limited technical, human and financial resources www.rec.org Successes, Problems and Remaining Challenges: PP in Environmental Decision-making Article 6-7 • • • • • • Increased interest of public to participate in PP in EIA in big investments In drafting legislation and development of plans at regional and local level Good examples: LEAPs Detailed procedures and guidance missing in SEE while in candidate countries implementing practice needs to be improved Difficulties in implementing some of Art. 6 requirements in practice Differing practices across agencies and sectors www.rec.org Successes, Problems and Remaining Challenges: Access to Justice • Candidate countries: many partly successful cases in Bulgaria • Few or no appeal and court cases in SEE countries • Reform of judicial system underway in SEE • Financial and other barriers • Injunctive relief not used • Judges and prosecutors do not know and apply Aarhus Convention www.rec.org Successes, Problems and Remaining Challenges • Looking beyond short term interests • Implementation of AI and PP pillars at the local level by municipalities and other authorities remains a challenge www.rec.org Lessons Learned • Long term strategic approach provides stable framework for more efficient, systematic and focused implementation • Need for continuous commitment and initiatives by the countries regardless of funding • Structures to support integrated and participatory approach in implementation (inter-governmental working groups, civil society involvement) www.rec.org Lessons learned • Focus more on involvement of and targeting other ministries and agencies • More efforts to address the local community level projects • Matching regional experience sharing and country specific approach: networking, joint capacity building • Tools to support capacity building for officials, NGOs, judiciary and other stakeholders • Flexible framework for projects www.rec.org