Cataloguing Codes and Conceptual Models: RDA and the Influence of FRBR and other IFLA Initiatives by Dr.
Download ReportTranscript Cataloguing Codes and Conceptual Models: RDA and the Influence of FRBR and other IFLA Initiatives by Dr.
Cataloguing Codes and Conceptual Models:
RDA and the Influence of FRBR and other IFLA Initiatives by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress for “Back to the Basics” February 1, 2007
Overview
Conceptual models FRBR Cataloging principles IME ICC Statement Work Expression Manifestation Item Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) New cataloging code
IFLA Initiatives ISBD International Standard Bibliographic Description FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records VIAF Virtual International Authority File IME ICC IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code replacing ‘Paris Principles’ of 1961
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) Entity-relationship model • • • Entities: Group 1, 2, 3 Relationships Attributes National level bibliographic record elements (mandatory & optional data) User tasks • find, identify, select, obtain Collocation at the work/expression level
Vocabulary
“Book” –Door prop (item) –“publication” at bookstore any copy (manifestation)
Vocabulary
“Book” –Who translated?
(expression) –Who wrote?
(work)
Work Expression is realized through Intellectual/ artistic content Physical recording of content Manifestation is embodied in Item is exemplified by
FRBR
Group 1 - Relationships Inherent to the Entities
Work
“is realized by” an expression
Expression
“is embodied in” a manifestation
Manifestation
“is exemplified by” an item
Item
Work Expression Manifestation Item
Relationships
Inherent among the entities Content relationships among works Whole-Part Accompanying
Family of Works Same Expression New Expression New Work
B. Tillett Dec. 2001
FRBR
Group 1 Entities’ Attributes
Manifestation
ID Work
Title
ID
Statement of responsibility
Title
Edition
Date
etc.
Imprint (place, publisher, date)
Expression
ID Title Form Date Language etc.
Form/extent of carrier Terms of availability Mode of access etc.
Item
ID
Provenance Location etc.
Work Expression Manifestation Item is owned by is produced by is realized by is created by
Group 2
FRBR Person Corporate Body many
DRAFT
FRAD extension to
FRBR Entities: Person Family Corporate Body Work Expression Manifestation Item Concept Object Event Place
FRBR
Name Identifier
December 2006
Access Point Rules Agency
Work has as subject has as subject has as subject Work Expression Manifestation Item
Group 3
FRBR Person Corporate Body Concept Object Event Place many
FRBR and MARC
MARC bibliographic, authority, and holdings records FRBR and MARC crosswalk and analysis: http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional analysis/frbr.html
FRBR-ize MARC records
OCLC’s algorithm http://www.oclc.org/research/software/frbr/ LC’s display tool http://www.loc.gov/marc http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/tool.html
Possible FRBR applications
Scenario A - Now
Authority Work/ Expression Uniform Title Person Series (work/expression) Uniform Title Concept Bibliographic Manifestation Holding Item
Scenario B
Authority Work/ Expression Uniform Title Person/ Corporate body Person/ Corporate body Series (work/expression) Uniform Title Concept Bibliographic Manifestation Holding Item
•
FRBR Benefits
Collocation Better organization to catalog • • Easier cataloging Reduction in cataloging load Work only cataloged once for all expressions of it Expression only cataloged once for all manifestations of it Item cataloging (already simple) remains the same
FRBR Benefits
Circulation: Place holds at “Work” or “Expression” level rather than only at manifestation level (VTLS and OCLC demonstrate this)
Applications of conceptual model
FRBR is conceptual model No application is prescribed Opportunities for the future in new systems designs Greater connection with a&i, digital aggregators Keep user foremost in mind
Cataloguing Principles
1961 – IFLA’s “Paris Principles”
IME ICC
Goals & Objectives
Goal • Increase the ability to share cataloguing worldwide by • Promoting standards Objectives • Develop “Statement of International Cataloguing Principles” • • See if rules/practices can get closer together Make recommendations for an International Cataloguing Code
IME ICC Regional Meetings
IME ICC1 – Europe/Anglo-American http://www.ddb.de/standardisierung/afs/imeicc_index.htm
IME ICC2 – Latin America-Caribbean http://www.loc.gov/imeicc2 IME ICC3 – Middle East http://www.loc.gov/loc/ifla/imeicc/ IME ICC4 – Asia http://www.nl.go.kr/icc/icc/main.php
Next/Final Meeting – IME ICC5
2007 August 15-16 subSaharan Africa Hosted by the National Library of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (2003-2007) 1. Scope 2. Entities, Attributes, Relationships 3. Functions of the Catalogue 4. Bibliographic Description 5. Access Points 6. Authority Records 7. Foundations for Search Capabilities
Objectives for Construction of Cataloguing Codes
Convenience of user Common usage Representation Accuracy Sufficiency and necessity Significance Economy Standardization Integration Defensible, not arbitrary If contradict, take a defensible, practical solution.
Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)
Semantic Web Building Blocks
A&I controlled vocabularies Other controlled vocabularies ( Library ) authority files “ Ontologies ” End-user
What is the VIAF?
System Links between files Web browser access Multi-lingual and multi-scripts Allow national or regional variations in authorized form to co-exist Support needs for variations in preferred language, script, and spelling Maintenance National agencies control their records Records harvested from national systems Scalable Any number of national authority files
Project Stages
Stage 1: Retrospective Link Phase 1: Build enhanced authority files for both PND and LC person names Phase 2: Match PND and LC enhanced authority records to create the initial version of the VIAF Stage 2: Ongoing Maintenance Phase 3: Build OAI Server Phase 4: Ongoing maintenance and metadata harvesting using OAI protocols Stage 3: Searchable system Stage 4: End user interface with Unicode displays
IFLA
FRBR Cataloging principles IME ICC Statement Work Expression Manifestation Item Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)
International Cataloguing Code
AACR: Supporting Organizational Structure
Committee of Principals AACR Fund Trustees/ Publishers ALA CC:DA ACOC Joint Steering Committee BL CCC CILIP LC
JSC, Editor, Project Manager
1997 International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR Toronto, Canada JSC invited worldwide experts Issues leading to RDA Principles Content vs. carrier Logical structure of AACR Seriality Internationalization
Why a new standard?
Simplify rules Encourage use as a content standard for metadata schema Encourage international applicability Provide more consistency Address current problems Principle-based Build on cataloger’s judgment Encourage application of FRBR/FRAD
Why not just keep revising AACR2?
AACR2 1978 1988 1998 2002
A new cataloging environment
Wide range of information carriers: wider depth and complexity of content Metadata created by a wider range of personnel Many new metadata formats
RDA will be…
A new standard for resource description and access Designed for the digital environment Developed as a web-based product Description and access of all digital resources (and analog) Resulting records usable in the digital environment (Internet, Web OPACs, etc.)
RDA will be…
Multinational
content standard
for a variety of media and formats collected by libraries today Developed for use in English language environment; also be used in other language communities Independent of the communication format (e.g., MARC 21)
RDA will…
Support FRBR user tasks Find, identify, select, obtain Enable users of library catalogues, etc. to find and use resources appropriate to their information needs
Targets of Strategic Plan
1.
2.
3.
New edition – early 2009 Reach out to other communities Web-based product/tool, plus a print paper product
RDA Structure (Proposed)
General introduction Part A – Description and access Part B – Authority control (Access point control) Appendices Capitalization, Numerals, Initial articles, Abbreviations Presentation (ISBD display, OPAC display, etc.) Glossary Index
Part A Chapters 0-5
0. Introduction 1. General guidelines for resource description 2. Identification of the resource 3. Carrier 4. Content FRBR “Select” FRBR “Select” 5. Acquisition and access information FRBR “Obtain”
Part A, Chapters 6-7 “Relationships”
FRBR user task “Find” Chapter 6: Relationships between FRBR Group 1 and Group 2 entities: Persons Corporate bodies Families Chapter 7: Relationships between FRBR Group 1 entities: Works Expressions Manifestations Items
Part B Access Point Control
Choice of access points General guidelines for access point control Access points (preferred forms and variants) for: Persons, Families, Corporate bodies, Places Works, Expressions, etc.
Other information used in access point control (entity identifiers, sources, etc.)
New Terminology
AACR2 terms Heading Authority control Authorized heading Main Entry Added Entry Uniform title RDA terms Access point Access point control Preferred access point Primary Access point Secondary Access point Preferred title
RDA Draft Reviews
Mar. June 2007: Chapter 3 “Carrier” July –Sept. 2007: Chapters 6 and 7 “Relationships” Dec. 2007 Mar. 2008: Part B “Access Point Control” July-Sept. 2008: Complete draft of RDA Early 2009: First release of RDA
Content vs. display
RDA will be a content standard display standard not a RDA records can still be displayed in an ISBD display if desired
Transcription
“Take what you see” Correction of inaccuracies Facilitating automated data capture
Other issues
Terms for Content and Carrier RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization JSC GMD/SMD Working Group Mandatory (“Required”) Elements Mapping Data Elements RDA/MARC 21 Dublin Core
Ongoing work
Mode of Issuance Internationalization Persistent Identifiers and URLs Appendices Access Points for Families Examples Glossary
Preparing for RDA…
Coding RDA records in MARC 21 – and DC? Most RDA data elements can be incorporated into MARC 21 A few changes: New data elements to replace GMDs Possibly some other modifications necessary to MARC 21 RDA and DC: mappings, further discussions
Making decisions about RDA
RDA will offer many alternatives, options Only a few required data elements Who decides how to apply RDA?
National libraries Other governing bodies: OCLC, PCC
Training for RDA
Catalogers
will
need some training in RDA Groups that provide training are beginning to make plans Online product will assist with learning
RDA Online Prototype
View/listen to a 3-minute demo. of RDA Online Complete a brief survey – we want your feedback!
www.rdaonline.org
Commenting on RDA drafts RDA drafts available at:
www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/rda.html
Informal discussion: subscribe to RDA-L (link on page above) Formal comments: within Europe, contact the JSC Chair, Deirdre Kiorgaard at:
Summary
User-oriented models (FRBR) Internationalization Global sharing Cost reduction Across information communities/memory institutions Principle-based rules (IME ICC) Cataloger’s judgment Take descriptive metadata Add controlled vocabularies for precision of searching (VIAF)
Takk fyrir!
Thank you!