wwww.coe.int MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF MULTILINGUAL CLASSROOMS: EXPLOITING PLURILINGUAL REPERTOIRES, MANAGING TRANSITIONS AND DEVELOPING PROFICIENCY IN THE LANGUAGE(S) OF SCHOOLING Intergovernmental seminar Strasbourg, 7-8 March 2012 www.coe.int/lang.
Download ReportTranscript wwww.coe.int MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF MULTILINGUAL CLASSROOMS: EXPLOITING PLURILINGUAL REPERTOIRES, MANAGING TRANSITIONS AND DEVELOPING PROFICIENCY IN THE LANGUAGE(S) OF SCHOOLING Intergovernmental seminar Strasbourg, 7-8 March 2012 www.coe.int/lang.
wwww.coe.int MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF MULTILINGUAL CLASSROOMS: EXPLOITING PLURILINGUAL REPERTOIRES, MANAGING TRANSITIONS AND DEVELOPING PROFICIENCY IN THE LANGUAGE(S) OF SCHOOLING Intergovernmental seminar Strasbourg, 7-8 March 2012 www.coe.int/lang wwww.coe.int DEVELOPING ‘ACADEMIC LANGUAGE’ IN SECONDARY EDUCATION Eike Thürmann www.coe.int/lang E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education Predictor mathematical competence for Variance: Prediction rate in % Socioeconomic status Migration status 16.5 Cultural capital 2.0 3.0 Pre-school education 1.6 Family language 0.5 Employment father 0.3 Family structure ns (Prenzel et al. 2004) 3 What matters: Not the language per se, but the variety normally used for teaching and learning in formal education E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education There is an urgent need to turn around this situation: What we need is a PEDAGOGY OF RIGOUR AND HOPE I maintain that it is possible for second language learners to develop deep disciplinary knowledge and engage in challenging academic activities if teachers know how to support them to achieve their potential. Aída Walqui (2006) 4 CHANGE OF PARADIGM: From „how teaching and learning of content is organised“ to „how content is taught and learnt in a languagesensitive way“ E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education Principles 5 Goals Sustain academic rigour Hold high expectations Engage students in quality interactions Sustain a language focus Develop quality curriculum Walqui, A., L. van Lier (2010). Scaffolding the Academic Success of Adolescent English Language Learners: A Pedagogy of Promise. WestEd E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 6 LANGUAGE-SENSITIVE CONTENT TEACHING: Dual focus on content and language across the curriculum – A whole-school language policy Three strategies (and tools) to create awareness (also of non-language specialists!): I. A Curricular framework for academic language competences II. A Checklist for the evaluation of language-sensitive content teaching III.A set of techniques for subject-based language scaffolding E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 7 I. ACADEMIC LANGUAGE SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED BY THE END OF MANDATORY SCHOOLING 1. General classroom interaction: negotiation of meaning and participation 2. Information retrieval and processing 3. Basic cognitive-communicative strategies and discourse functions 4. Documenting, presenting and exchanging of learning results 5. Availability of linguistic means and language elements Extensive analysis of curricular documents – Chamber of Commerce requirements for vocational training – random sample of task-setting in school-/textbooks - … E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 8 I. ACADEMIC LANGUAGE SKILLS TO BE ACQUIRED BY THE END OF MANDATORY SCHOOLING negotiation of meaning information retrieval Semiotic systems genre diagram Picture cognitive activities task presentation of results Basic cognitivcommunicative functions Name describe … Availability olf linguistic means Word level Sentence level Text level What can we do to protect our ground-water? Make a class poster and write all the things we can do … E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 9 1. Basic General classroom interaction: negotiation of meaning and participation Students can clarify conditions for handling and completion of tasks, organise their work procedures effectively and arrive at results.. putting relevant questions and asking for clarification where necessary reacting appropriately to statements by other peers or teacher reading carefully through instructions for work and tasks to be carried out in order to be certain what is expected and under what conditions … 10 indicators E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 10 3. Basic cognitive-communicative strategies and discourse functions Students can use appropriate language strategies and tools to process information, experience, and ideas applying basic language/discourse functions. This entails mastering the following cognitive and language skills in particular: NAMING/DEFINING – DESCRIBING – REPORTING/NARRATING – EXPLAINING – ARGUING/TAKING (UP) A STANCE – JUDGING/VALUING – MODELLING/SIMULATING 25 indicators E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 11 3. Basic cognitive-communicative strategies and discourse functions: e.g ARGUING/TAKING (UP) A STANCE e.g. clarifying the advantages and drawbacks of differing facts and ways of behaving, weighing (up) and discussing the pros and cons to arrive at a personal viewpoint . e.g. taking a stance for real-life situations which demand crucial decision-making (e.g. abortion, medicide) by resorting to arguments based on Christian ethics. E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 12 2. Information retrieval and processing 4. Documenting, presenting and exchanging of learning results 16 indicators 8 Genre-based indicators curriculum stream (Hammond 2001) E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 13 5. Availability of linguistic means and language elements • level of individual words and collocations : e.g. o using one’s knowledge about the structure of composite nouns and adjectives to decipher the meaning of technical terms (e.g. burnable, in-flamm-able], acid-resistant] • Sentence level: e.g. o indicating the impersonal nature of statements through the use of the passive or other appropriate forms of expression (such as “X can be measured” and “it should be added that”) o accurately describing features (for example by adding attributes and attributive clauses) • Level of the text: e.g. o avoiding presuppositions o introducing new topics/content in a well-ordered fashion 38 indicators E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 14 BOTTOM-UP VERIFICATION • appropriately labelling living things, objects, processes, events, topics and viewpoints • assessing and specifying their specific characteristics • Identify and correctly name seasons and most important festivities of the Christian Church Year (e.g. Lent, Passion Time, Pentecost, Advent, Christmas …) • Identify and denote most important Jewish and Muslim festivities Religious Education E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education II.A CHECKLIST FOR THE EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE-SENSITIVE CONTENT TEACHING Areas of observation 1. Dual-focussed transparent target-setting = 6 indicators 2. Teacher´s use of language = 9 indicators 3. Classroom interaction and opportunities for verbal action = 13 indicators 4. Subject-specific language scaffolding = 7 indicators 5. Linguistically adequate materials and media for teaching and learning = 7 indicators 6. Assessment of language competences = 6 indicators 15 E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 16 1. In my geography classes I communicate the specific language requirements of content teaching to my pupils in such a way that they fully understand which language activities they are expected to perform and which language competences they are supposed to acquire. ++ + - -- 1.1 At the beginning of a teaching unit I clearly point out and explain what we want to find out (= geography content) as well as which language competences and activities are relevant for successfully dealing with tasks and assignments. e.g. →in the shape of dual/focused advance organizers Indicators 1.2 – 1.6 E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 17 Glossary for subject specialists (language pedagogy) Focus on content Focus on language e.g.: Advance organizer = information that is At prior the end the up-coming teaching will by have presented tooflearning and that canunit be we used learnt the learner to organize and interpret new incoming in which way water is the necessary how we specify measures information. They provide scaffolding distributed across the globe of quantity in absolute and for students to …. relative terms (e.g. water covers 70.9% of the Earth's In language-sensitive content teaching o.how have surface)a. and we a transform diagrams (bar dual focus and raise students´awareness for subjectcharts, pie charts) into specific content as well as pertinent language descriptive statements competences. in which states water appears on earth and which properties can be attributed to …. how to connect to connect single descriptive statements and arrive at a short coherent written text … E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education II.A CHECKLIST FOR THE EVALUATION OF LANGUAGE-SENSITIVE CONTENT TEACHING Selfevaluation Reflective teaching Peerevaluation classroom development teacher training 18 E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education III. A 19 SET OF TECHNIQUES FOR SUBJECT-BASED LANGUAGE SCAFFOLDING • • • • • • • • • • • Task-based organisation of learning Extend periods of written work (writing across the curriculum, writing to learn science) Decelerate rate of classroom interaction Make use of plurilingual competences (language awareness) Terminology: visualise subject-specific cognitive concepts Extend repertoire of „grammar words“ (synsemantica) Offer list of functional „chunks“ to choose from Extend wait time Open up triadic dialogues (IRF-cycles) Discover the distinctive features of subject-specific genres … E. Thuermann: Developing ‘academic language’ in secondary education 20 Hammond, Jennifer (ed.) (2001). Scaffolding. Teaching and Learning in Language and Literacy Education. Newtown, Austr. (PETA). Walqui, A., L. van Lier (2010). Scaffolding the Academic Success of Adolescent English Language Learners: A Pedagogy of Promise. WestEd Walqui, Aida (2006).Scaffolding Instruction for English Language Learners: A Conceptual Framework. In: The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9/2. 159-180. http://www.educacion.gob.es/exterior/centros/losangeles/es/ series/201003-Scaffolding-Walqui.pdf