Biconditionals and Definitions LESSON 2-2 Additional Examples Consider this true conditional statement. Write its converse.
Download ReportTranscript Biconditionals and Definitions LESSON 2-2 Additional Examples Consider this true conditional statement. Write its converse.
Biconditionals and Definitions LESSON 2-2 Additional Examples Consider this true conditional statement. Write its converse. If the converse is also true, combine the statements as a biconditional. Conditional: If x = 5, then x + 15 = 20. To write the converse, exchange the hypothesis and conclusion. Converse: If x + 15 = 20, then x = 5. When you subtract 15 from each side to solve the equation, you get x = 5. Because both the conditional and its converse are true, you can combine them in a true biconditional using the phrase if and only if. Biconditional: x = 5 if and only if x + 15 = 20. Quick Check HELP GEOMETRY Biconditionals and Definitions LESSON 2-2 Additional Examples Write the two statements that form this biconditional. Biconditional: Lines are skew if and only if they are noncoplanar. A biconditional is written as two conditionals that are converses of each other. Conditional: If lines are skew, then they are noncoplanar. Converse: If lines are noncoplanar, then they are skew. Quick Check HELP GEOMETRY Biconditionals and Definitions LESSON 2-2 Additional Examples Show that this definition of triangle is reversible. Then write it as a true biconditional. Definition: A triangle is a polygon with exactly three sides. The original conditional is true. Conditional: If a polygon is a triangle, then it has exactly three sides. The converse is also true. Converse: If a polygon has exactly three sides, then it is a triangle. Because both statements are true, they can be combined to form a biconditional. A polygon is a triangle if and only if it has exactly three sides. Quick Check HELP GEOMETRY Biconditionals and Definitions LESSON 2-2 Additional Examples Is the following statement a good definition? Explain. An apple is a fruit that contains seeds. The statement is true as a description of an apple. Now exchange “An apple” and “a fruit that contains seeds,” and the reverse reads: A fruit that contains seeds is an apple. There are many other fruits containing seeds that are not apples, such as lemons and peaches. These are counterexamples, so the reverse of the statement is false. The original statement is not a good definition because the statement is not reversible. Quick Check HELP GEOMETRY