RESISTIVE MAGNETS Maintenance, Upgrades Jim O’Reilly: RES/MAG Maintenance POWERED: Magnet Cells J. Chen, Jim O’Reilly, J.
Download ReportTranscript RESISTIVE MAGNETS Maintenance, Upgrades Jim O’Reilly: RES/MAG Maintenance POWERED: Magnet Cells J. Chen, Jim O’Reilly, J.
RESISTIVE MAGNETS Maintenance, Upgrades Jim O’Reilly: RES/MAG Maintenance POWERED: Magnet Cells J. Chen, Jim O’Reilly, J. Toth, S.T.Bole, S. Gundlach, Chris Ray, Nicole Walsh Chris Ray Nicole Walsh 7 Resistive Magnets & 1 Hybrid presently. 4 Upgrades, 1 SeriesConnected Hybrid and a Split are planned. Cell 2 Cell 4 Cell 6 Cell 8 SPLIT 2010 195mm 19.5 T 52mm 25T 12ppm Cell 1 Cell 3 Cell 10 Cell 12 Cell 14 35T 33T 36T SCH 36T ~2010 35T 2009 2012 Cell 11 Cell 13 Cell 15 Hybrid Cell 5 Cell 7 Cell 9 50mm 31T 28T 50 mm 31T Test Stand I 32T ~2011 Test Stand II 32 T ~2010 50ppm Maintenance past year 11 coils stacked, 6 coils installed. Complete set of spare coils on-hand.! Magnet bores are 32 mm unless noted otherwise. Cell 16 45T 3 PS Resistive Magnet Solenoids Worldwide 42 40 Field, T 38 36 Tallahassee Grenoble 34 Nijmegen 32 Tallahasse Nijmegen 30 16 18 20 22 24 26 Power, MW Black = Tallahassee Red = Nijmegen Blue = Grenoble = 3 cm bore = 5 cm bore 28 30 Upgrades Planned for Grenoble and Nijmegen 42 Field, T 40 38 Upgrade Upgrade 36 34 Grenoble 32mm Nijmegen 32mm 32 30 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Power, MW Grenoble: using 24 MW expect to attain higher field than our 20 MW magnets. Nijmegen: By building 800 mm OD magnets expect to attain higher field than our 600 mm OD magnets Proposed NHMFL Upgrades 42 28 MW New Magnet 40 Field, T 38 28 MW New Magnet 36 Upgrade Grenoble NHMFL-32mm 34 Nijmegen 32 Upgrade NHMFL-50mm 30 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Power, MW Short-Term: Improved stacking pattern using existing disks and housings will keep us competitive. Long -Term: Utilizing available power, building larger housings and new magnets will keep us ahead of the competition. Need Funding 30 32 mm Bore Magnet Upgrade A1 A2 Existing Planned Existing Planned Disks/turn 6 5.54 7 6.53 Current Density (A/mm2) 714 770 412 440 Power Density (W/mm3) 14 16.5 4.59 5.25 Stress (MPa) 668 647 642 621 Field Contribution (T) 10.0 10.7 10.1 10.7 Total field increases from 35T to 36T. • More complicated stating pattern attains fractional disks per turn and higher efficiency magnets. This approach has already been employed in the 45 T hybrid insert. • 32-mm and 50-mm magnets will be upgraded by ~1 T in coming years as the existing magnet wear out. • This will enable us to keep up with other labs at minimal cost. 50 mm Bore Magnet Upgrade A1 A2 Existing Planned Existing Planned Disks/turn 6 4.62 8 6.59 Current Density (A/mm2) 534 592 402 423 Power Density (W/mm3) 7.73 9.49 4.27 4.72 Stress (MPa) 623 635 648 646 Field Contribution (T) 7.1 7.8 9.1 10 Total field increases from 31T to 32T. 575mm 400mm 28 MW New Magnet Concept 600mm OD 1000mm OD 20MW – 35T 28MW – 40T Requires Funding Summary • MagLab resistive magnets unmatched worldwide! • Competition Is Gaining! (24 MW vs 20 MW) • Short Term Plan – More efficient stacking using existing disks, housings, etc. to stay competitive • Long Term Proposal – New housings and disks @ 28 MW to stay ahead.