Management and organizational structure of large scale innovative projects Craig A. Stewart Executive Director, Pervasive Technology Institute; Associate Dean, Research Technologies 19 July 2011 [email protected] Presented at.
Download ReportTranscript Management and organizational structure of large scale innovative projects Craig A. Stewart Executive Director, Pervasive Technology Institute; Associate Dean, Research Technologies 19 July 2011 [email protected] Presented at.
Management and organizational structure of large scale innovative projects Craig A. Stewart Executive Director, Pervasive Technology Institute; Associate Dean, Research Technologies 19 July 2011 [email protected] Presented at FLEET** Working Group Meeting, 19 July, Vienna, Austria Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2022/13403 **http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=PROJ_ICT&ACTION=D&CAT=PROJ&RCN=99182 1 The FP7 FET projects will be of extremely large scale • This requires perhaps unprecedented project management and execution within a public and open future technologies project • “FET Flagships are ambitious large-scale, science-driven, research initiatives that aim to achieve a visionary goal. The scientific advance should provide a strong and broad basis for future technological innovation and economic exploitation in a variety of areas, as well as novel benefits for society.” http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/programme/fet/flagship/home_en.html • The only ways to achieve ‘novel benefits for society’ are government funded large scale deployment or successful commercialization. How do you do this over 10 years and avoid being at risk of disruptive change (in the sense of Clayton M. Christensen) • Identifying and realizing value – Applied science and engineering [a la Wagner] – Basic science and engineering [a la Donizetti] – They are different; may operate at different timescales and with different reliability; both may well be needed for a FET Flagship project 2 James Bryant Conant, President, Harvard University, 1933-1953. Letter to the Editor, NY Times, 13 August 1945. Regarding applied research: “Research of this nature, like that in industry, can be effectively organized and planned because there are very definitely defined objectives.” James B. Conant, 1933. Credit: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Regarding basic research: “There is only one proved method of assisting the advancement of pure science – that of picking men of genius, backing them heavily and leaving them to direct themselves.” 3 Net-enabled Business Innovation Cycle Capabilities & Competencies Hi Assessing External Customer & External Market Internal Organization Internal Client Value (CV) Low Hi Value Potential Executing Business Innovation for Growth (BI) Matching with Economic Opportunities (EO) Low Choosing Enabling/Emerging Technologies (ET) Communicating Business Initiatives Conveying New IT Insights Time ET ET ET ©Bradley C. Wheeler, Indiana University www.ppttube.com/presentations/sal_innovationit.ppt Used with permission Four Distinct Types of Routines Universe of ____ Identifying Assessing Filtering Like a funnel Deciding “Vetted List of _____ for Adoption Consideration” Adapted from ©Bradley C. Wheeler, Indiana University The Net-enabled Business Innovation Cycle (NEBIC). Used with permission Project Management • What are the key promises? – # of 2nd level leaders (direct reports to CEO > # key promises) • What is discovery, what is development and delivery? • With projects of the proposed scale, plan a development and delivery plan with defined areas of delivery and discovery – Not “we’ll discover and good things will just happen as a result” – Not “a miracle happens here” • 10 year project plan with incremental deliverables and contingency plans essential • Project Plan is not enough without a Program Execution Plan (latter is more detailed text, includes interface agreements and service level agreements) • If economic benefit is promised then there must be an economic development subcomponent of the overall plan 6 A large project needs… • Exactly one – – – – – – CEO CFO CIO Chief Technology Transfer Officer Chief Compliance Officer Chief Project Manager • May need one of the following – Chief Scientist – Chief Technical Officer – Chief Systems Engineer • At least one – Production facilities – Test facilities 7 • Governance Project management – Strategy vs tactic (those things not identified as strategically important are by their omission identified as not important) – Working groups – innovating, brainstorming, making recommendations – Command and control – making decisions and enacting them – Input rights, decision rights (Weill & Ross – “IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results”) – Information flow – needs to be free upwards • Agreements – Interface agreements – Service Level agreements • Trust – Essential for proper resolution of conflicts and problems • Money – Money is distilled personality; money is a dream; money is a nightmare; you can never accept money as a gift (From H. Miller, Money Isn't Is Everything, ISBN ISBN 10: 0881771325 and The Seven Laws of Money, M. Phillips & S. Rasberry) – Money and time can be somewhat exchangeable – Big projects work well when money is burned steadily (this is not an Optimal Control Theory problem!) 8 Collaboration, project management, systems engineering • “Collaboration is not the same as cooperation. Collaboration requires alignment around a common goal. Collaboration is about doing something together. Collaboration only lasts as long as the alignment around common purpose lasts.” James Hilton, U. of Virginia [Quote courtesy Brad Wheeler, IU] • Once you have them by the budget, their hearts, minds, and time allocations will follow • Project management incremental deliverables of value essential – Funding release based on achieving milestones – A budget plan should not be a commitment when completion of deliverables is optional – But project management should reward honesty • Project management and systems engineering are different • Systems engineering may well be needed as part of a FET program – This implies multiple full time systems engineers and a formal systems engineering system 9 IT infrastructure and Virtual Organizations • Cyberinfrastructure consists of computing systems, data storage systems, advanced instruments and data repositories, visualization environments, and people, all linked together by software and high performance networks to improve research productivity and enable breakthroughs not otherwise possible • eScience may be European for Cyberinfrastructure • Any large scale project must have its own cyberinfrastructure • The Flagship projects will be a large Virtual Organization, collaborating over geographic distance. Everyone involved should read some of the key literature on VO collaboration over distance 10 11 Cyberinfrastructure tools for collaboration • • • • • • • • • • Project management Version control Bug tracking Trouble ticket tracking Knowledge Base Document control Web content management Group (Virtual Organization) collaboration Telecollaboration (high def) The only thing worse than no tools for some category of function is two tools 12 Project management and related tools Project management Microsoft Project Jira? Drupal Bug Tracking Jira Bugzilla Trouble ticket tracking Request tracker Knowledge base management Use one – but trouble ticket systems are not knowledge bases 13 14 Version control Tool Centralized Or distributed? Performance Ease of use Security (access control) Subversion C + + ++ Mercurial D (Bisect) + + + Git D (Bisect) - + 15 Document Tools • Document control – Sharepoint – Confluence • Web content management system – Drupal (if it’s good enough for Google…) • Collaboration frameworks – Hubzero (good access control) – Google 16 nanoHUB Screen Image © Network for Computational Nanotechnology (nanohub.org/groups/ncn). Risk management • Hope is not a strategy • Plan for regional civil / natural disasters – Implies geographically distributed mirroring of data – If you can’t be back up and running within 24 hours of losing your main data center you don’t really have a plan • Personnel plans: plan for each key leader to be incapacitated and yet have the project continue successfully Photo by U.S. Coast Guard, Petty Officer 2nd Class Kyle Niemi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:KatrinaNewOrleansFlooded_edit2.jpg Photo in public domain 18 IU’s cyberinfrastructure From: http://rtinfo.indiana.edu/ci 19 Technology transfer • Advance agreement on policies and practice • What you do with technology transfer must match up against the promises for economic development • The financial plan cannot be money goes in for a decade and comes back starting at the end when economic development is a goal • There is no reason to believe that economic benefits can be protected exclusively by IP agreements and legal processes (how do Radiohead and other bands make their money?) 20 FET flagships different than usual financial plans – this will be a challenge Graphic by Bradley C. Wheeler. Used under Creative Commons 3.0 unported attribution license 21 People - One of the biggest challenges (a US view – EU might be different) • Attracting and retaining the right people to execute our strategies • Job searches generally don’t work by themselves • Hiring people on grants is great; keeping them funded, and feeling secure, happy, and productive, is hard • The key asset: the feeling of meaning in one’s work • Leadership counts 22 License terms • Items indicated with a © are under copyright and used here with permission. Such items may not be reused without permission from the holder of copyright except where license terms noted on a slide permit reuse. • Please cite this presentation as: Stewart, C.A. 2011. “Management and organizational structure of large scale innovative projects.” Presentation. Presented at FLEET Working Group Meeting, 19 July, 2011, Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2022/13403 • Portions of this document that originated from sources outside IU are shown here and used by permission or under licenses indicated within this document. • Except where otherwise noted, the contents of this presentation are copyright 2011 by the Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). This license includes the following terms: You are free to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to remix – to adapt the work under the following conditions: attribution – you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. 23 Thank you! • Questions and discussion? 24