CHAPTER 12 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS PART 2 Good faith and proper purpose At the end of this topic you should.
Download ReportTranscript CHAPTER 12 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS PART 2 Good faith and proper purpose At the end of this topic you should.
CHAPTER 12 DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER OFFICERS PART 2 Good faith and proper purpose At the end of this topic you should know: • the conduct expected of directors under their duties of good faith and loyalty; • the overlap between the general law and statutory formulations of the duties of good faith and loyalty; • the requirements under the general law and the Corporations Act for the duty of good faith and proper purpose; and • the statutory formulation of the duty to retain discretions. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Outline of Duties of Loyalty and Good Faith Directors owe duties of loyalty and good faith because they are in a fiduciary relationship with the companies on whose behalf they act. These duties can be divided into various categories: • to act in good faith in the interests of the company; • to use powers for their proper purpose; • to retain discretionary powers; and • to avoid actual and potential conflicts of interest and duty. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. To Whom are the Duties Owed? The duties are owed to the company (Percival v Wright [1902]), but has been extended to: • individual members; • creditors; • beneficiaries of trust; and • employees. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Duty to Act in Good Faith – Description and Source The duty to act in good faith in the interests of the company requires directors to act “bona fide [good faith] in what they consider – not what the court may consider – is in the interests of the company”: Re Smith & Fawcett Ltd [1942]. The duty arises under: • the general law – in particular, from principles of equity collectively known as “fiduciary law”; and • ss181 (statutory duty) and 184 (can be criminal) of the Corporations Act. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Examples of Breach of Duty • Controlling members and controlling company assets. • Providing personal benefits. • Favourable directors’ transactions. • Forgiving debts owed to the company. • Transferring company assets to others. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Scope of Duty Directors are required to act in good faith in what they consider to be the interests of the company as a whole — Re Smith & Fawcett. Directors should consider the interests of the company as a commercial entity and the members of the company: Darvall v North Sydney Brick & Tile Co Ltd (1988). In companies with two or more classes of shares, the courts have focussed on whether the decision was fair as between the different classes of members: Mills v Mills (1936). 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Scope of Duty If the company is insolvent or nearing insolvency then “interests of the company” includes the interests of creditors: Spies v R (2000). In relation to dealings between companies in a corporate group, directors of wholly owned subsidiaries may make decisions which are in the best interests of the holding company, but not necessarily the best interests of the subsidiaries: s 187. In relation to directors of partly owned subsidiaries, there are two lines of authority: one that favours directors having regard to the interests of the group (Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1970]), and the other that favours the interest of the company in which they are a director (Walker v Wimborne (1976)). 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Scope of Duty In relation to nominee directors, directors of wholly owned subsidiary companies, who were nominated by the holding companies, may have dual loyalties: s 187. In relation to current employees and the community, directors may consider their interests, if they can affect the interests of the company (eg in industrial matters, or sponsorship that provides good public relations): Parke v Daily News Ltd [1962]. The company’s constitution may also permit directors to take account of a particular stakeholder’s interest ahead of others: Berlei-Hesta (NZ) Ltd v Fernyhough [1980]. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Duty to Exercise Power for Proper Purposes The duty concerns how directors, in managing a company, exercise the powers given to them by their employment contract, the company’s internal rules and the Corporations Act: ss 198A-198C. The duty arises under fiduciary law (General law), and ss 181 and 184 of the Corporations Act. The onus of establishing that the directors have acted improperly rests on the person(s) making allegations: Australian Metropolitan Life Assurance Co Ltd v Ure (1923). 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Determining Whether Breach of Duty To determine whether there has been a breach, courts apply a two-step test: 1. ascertain the nature and purposes for which power is conferred — the legal purpose by reviewing the internal rules, or the type of company, its structure and activities; and then 2. compare with the actual purpose or reason for which power was exercised by determining what the directors subjectively believed at the time they exercised the power. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Determining Whether Breach of Duty In relation to multiple purposes, look at the substantive or dominant purposes (Whitehorse v Carlton Hotel Pty Ltd). If the actual purpose for the exercise of the power is within the range of legal purpose(s), the directors have acted properly and discharged their duty. If the actual purpose is outside the legal purpose(s), a breach of duty will have taken place. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Examples of Improper Purposes • Allotment of shares to defeat takeover: Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum [1974]. • Allotment of shares to transfer control of a major company asset: Bailey v Mandala Private Hospital (1988). • Dominant purpose of allotment of shares to preserve the position of majority members: Whitehorse v Carlton Hotel Pty Ltd (1987). • Allotment of shares used to dilute/devalue existing members: Kotokovich Constructions Pty Ltd v Wallington (1995). 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Section 181 – Good Faith and Proper Purpose The statutory duty in good faith has been interpreted as being broadly equivalent to the general law duties to act in good faith, in the interests of the company and for proper purposes. The standard is to be determined objectively: ASIC v Adler (2002). Section 184 imposes criminal penalties for breach of the duty to act in good faith and for proper purpose when a director is “reckless” or “intentionally dishonest.” 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Duty to Retain Discretions The general law imposes two duties on members of a board in respect of their discretions: • duty to exercise an active discretion; and • duty to retain directors’ discretion. Directors can fetter their discretion but this can breach their duty to retain discretion (MIA Group Ltd). 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes. Duty to Retain Discretions The scope of the duty may be limited by: • a company’s internal rules (see for example delegation to others ss 189-190); • delegation to a managing director (s 198C replaceable rule); • delegation to a committee (s 198D replaceable rule); and • their right to act in the interests of the person or company who nominated or appointed them. 2013 Thomson Legal & Regulatory Ltd. All Rights Reserved. PowerPoint slides to accompany Corporations Law: In Principle, 8 th Edition. Ciro & Symes.