A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 5 Sept 2002
Download ReportTranscript A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 5 Sept 2002
A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure Address Policy SIG APNIC14, Kitakyushu, Japan 5 Sept 2002 Background and Problem • No specific policy exists for infrastructure which is critical to Internet operation – Resources for ‘critical infrastructure’ important to protect stability of core Internet functions • Current policy regime only recognises ‘need’ rather than type of organisation – Most critical infrastructure unlikely to qualify for routable address space allocation – Addresses from upstream LIR: risk of widespread instability when renumbering Proposal • Allow portable addresses to be assigned to ‘critical infrastructure’ – Minimum assignment of /24 • “Critical Infrastructure” to be defined unambiguously – Definition could change over time • Address assignments specifically for servers and services comprising critical infrastructure – Not for other purposes by receiving organisation Proposal Continued • Critical Infrastructure includes: – Domain registry infrastructure (whois and DNS servers) • Root DNS • Generic top-level domain (gTLD) • “Country Code” top-level domain (ccTLD) – Address registry infrastructure (whois and reverse DNS servers) • RIRs and NIRs • IANA Other RIRs • ARIN – ‘critical infrastructure’ assignments recognised to: ccTLD, gTLD, RIRs, IANA, IXes – Recent modification: minimum assignment /24 • RIPE NCC – No special policy for critical infrastructure – LIRs can request portable address space on behalf of their customers – no minimum size • LACNIC – No policy, but a proposal will be made at next policy meeting Source of Address Space - Options • Allocate a single large block for all assignments – Allows easy configuration of ISP filters • May be necessary to ensure routability – More open to DOS attacks OR • Use existing ‘swamp’ space – Utilise existing free space – Likely to be routable in small blocks – Assignments not contiguous or easily recognisable Implementation • Secretariat to implement policy from three months after consensus – Documentation – Request forms and process – Inform community • Secretariat to report activity at future meetings • Review of policy as needed – Including definition of critical infrastructure A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure Questions?