GE Energy Delivering the IGCC Solution Daniel Tse June 29, 2006 Delivering the IGCC Solution Today’s Topics • • • • • • Market Outlook Why IGCC Gasification Experience Process Overview GE and Bechtel’s IGCC Alliance* Reference.
Download
Report
Transcript GE Energy Delivering the IGCC Solution Daniel Tse June 29, 2006 Delivering the IGCC Solution Today’s Topics • • • • • • Market Outlook Why IGCC Gasification Experience Process Overview GE and Bechtel’s IGCC Alliance* Reference.
GE
Energy
Delivering the
IGCC Solution
Daniel Tse
June 29, 2006
Delivering the IGCC Solution
Today’s Topics
•
•
•
•
•
•
Market Outlook
Why IGCC
Gasification Experience
Process Overview
GE and Bechtel’s IGCC Alliance* Reference Plant
Discussions
*Any reference to the “GE and Bechtel IGCC Alliance”, “GE and Bechtel’s IGCC Alliance”, or the “IGCC Alliance” is a reference to the
business arrangement established between the General Electric Company, by and through its GE Energy business, and Bechtel
Corporation pursuant to the terms of the Alliance Agreement entered into between the parties, and does not signify a joint venture,
partnership or any separate legal entity.
2 / GE /
June 2006
Why Coal?
• High/volatile natural gas prices
• Availability of natural gas/LNG
• Global Recoverable Reserves
– Oil 40 yrs, NG 70 yrs, Coal 192 yrs
• Need for fuel diversity
• Energy security/independence concerns
GW
200
>25% of World Power
Generation Additions
150
100
50
0 ‘96
‘00
Coal
Coal
‘04
‘08
‘12
The US’ most plentiful resource…
2004 US Total:
3,971 TWhr
~80 Proposed coal
plants – 50 GW
Source: GE power generation vertical
forecast
Coal
49.8%
Source: EIA: Electric
Report Annual
Report, 2005
3 / GE /
June 2006
Why Not Consider IGCC?
• Established technologies
• Fuel flexibility
• Addresses environmental issues
4 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC Commercialization
Coolwater
Prototype
120MW
Commercial Demos
Polk, Wabash
250MW
1984
The IGCC Puzzle
• CAPEX too high (+25%)
• COE too high (+10%)
• No system guarantees or
warrantees – only license
• Poor Initial RAM
1995
Reference Plant
Design Complete
630MW
2006
The Solution
The Solution
• GE gasification technology acquisition
• GE and Bechtel IGCC Alliance
• Turnkey, single source 630MW
reference plant offering with
guarantees & warranties
• Rigorous new product
development programs including low
rank coals
5 / GE /
June 2006
GE’s IGCC Technology … A Complete Package
Gasification
Technology
Power Generation
Technology
Commercial experience leader
Proven process design expertise
Guaranteed product performance
Manufacturing excellence
Power block equipment design
Technology development process
+
Optimized
System
Integration
IGCC Technology
Full plant system integration
Optimization of plant systems
Integrated plant controls
Overall optimization from
feedstock to plant output
6 / GE /
June 2006
Decades of Experience
Current/Future Operating Gasification Plants
Startup Dates
1950
1960
1990
2000
Solid
Liquid
Plants in Progress
> 3 GW GE IGCC
Exper ience
Pilot
2010
2004
Montebello Test Facility Operations
1946
Gas
1980
1970
120MW IGCC
Technical Demo
Cool Water
250MW IGCC
Commercial Demo
TECO/Polk Power
Dem o
Com m ercia l
900sTPD (China) Coal to Am m onia / Urea
1 ,1 3 2
1 ,1 2 0
2000sTPD / 250MW (USA) Coal to Pow er
(M W s)
1650sTPD (China) Coal to Am m onia / Urea
Hua ina n
TECO/ Polk
W eihe
760
1800sTPD (China) Coal to Tow n Gas / Methanol
Experience
with Coal
Luna n
SAR
UBE
Cool W a ter
Sy n g a s
Po w er
Ea stm a n
Sy n g a s
& Po w er
TVA
25sTPD plant at
Montebello USA
research lab
RAG/ RCH
Sha ngha i
550sTPD (China) Coal to Am m onia
800sTPD (W . Germ an) Coal to Oxo-chem / H 2
1650sTPD (Japan) Coal and Petroleum Coke to Am m onia
1000sTPD / 120MW (USA) Coal to Pow er
1100sTPD (USA) Coal to Methanol / Acetic Anhy dride
190sTPD (USA) Coal to Am m onia
165sTPD (W . Germ an) Coal to Oxo-chem icals
7 / GE /
June 2006
GE’s IGCC Technology & Experience Leadership
• Gasification leader since 1948 with
60+ facilities operating worldwide
• First coal gasification plant in 1978
• 21 gas turbines operating on
synthesis gas, 900,000 operating
hours
GE’s Gasification
Experience
2X Advantage
on All Fuels
>10X Advantage
on Solid Fuels
60+
• IGCC leader: >3 GW with GE
technologies
GE
Company A
Company B
26
14
1
1
1
# Gasification Plants # Gasification Plants
per Company
per Company
Company A and B data from Gasification Technologies Council Gasification Database – 09/05
8 / GE /
June 2006
GE’s Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
Five Basic Steps
CO2
Coal
Gasification
Syngas
Clean-up
Cooling
Sulfur
Mercury
Slag
Air
Heat
O2
Air
Separation
System
Air/N2
Combined
Cycle
System
Cleaned Fuel
Electricity
Key GE Technologies
Oxidant Supply
Gasification
Clean Up
Power Island
System Integration
9 / GE /
June 2006
Carbon Removal … A Proven Process
Oxygen,
Feedstock
Water Gas Shift
CO+H2O -> CO2+H2
Process Gas Only
High P, Low Volume
High Driving Force
Gasification
Optional Shift
AGR / SRU
Hg
Slag
Proven
Gasification
Power
S CO2
Proven Process Technology
• 60+ GE-licensed • 25+ GE-licensed
gasification units
gasification units
operating
operating
worldwide
worldwide using
shift reaction to
• 14 with solid
produce H2
feedstock
• 8 with solid
feedstock
H2
Diffusion
Combustor
Diluent NOX
Control
• 25+ GE-licensed
units operating
worldwide using
AGR technology
to completely
remove CO2 from
shifted syngas
• 8 with solid
feedstock
Proven Turbine
Capability
• 25 GE gas turbines
operating at 50%+ H2
• F-class combustion
validation up to
90% H2
10 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC - Cleaner By Design
Pollution Prevention
vs.
Pollution Control
WESP
Carbon
Injection
Boiler
SCR
ESP/
FF
FF
FGD
Pre-Combustion
PM, Hg, S, X…
High Temperature, High Pressure, Reducing Conditions
CaHbNcSdXe + H2O + O2 -> CO, H2 +CO2, H2O, N2, H2S
Ash & Minerals -> Vitrified Slag (non-leachable)
Sulfur Compounds-> Elemental Sulfur (Valuable Byproduct)
Mercury -> >90+% Removal Rate
Gas Cleanup at High Partial Pressure, Low Volume
11 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC Reference Plant…Key Requirements
• Develop coal-to-power IGCC reference plant design
• Output capacity sized for segment requirements
• Leverage GE & Bechtel’s extensive IGCC experience
• Reduce capital cost
• Improve availability – RAM focus
• Design for superior environmental performance
• NOX, SO2, PM10, Hg, less H2O consumption
• Provide fuel flexibility
• Coal & Coal/Petcoke Blends
• CO2 capture capability
• Competitive COE to SCPC
12 / GE /
June 2006
GE and Bechtel’s IGCC Alliance Reference Plant
Coal
Handling
Coal
Delivery
Nitrogen
Coal
Grinding
207FB
Combined
Cycle
ASU
Slurry
Oxygen
Gasification
And Syngas
Coolers
Optimized
System
Integration
Cleaned
Syngas
Washed
Syngas Low Temp.
Cooled
Syngas
Gas Cooling
Acid Gas
Removal
Acid
Gas
Slag
Fines
Handling
Fines
Slag/Fine
Offloading
Switchyard
Make-up Water
Treatment
Blowdown
Sulfur
Recovery
Product-Site
Interface
Wastewater
Treatment
Sulfur
Make-up Water
Delivery
Sulfur By-product
Handling
13 / GE /
June 2006
GE and Bechtel IGCC Alliance
• Alliance with Bechtel for 207FB 630 MW solid fuel IGCC Plant
• GE: product design, development, system integration, combined
cycle system & key gasification components
• Bechtel: engineering, procurement & construction (EPC), bulk
materials
• Single point responsibility for firm price, schedule, performance &
emission guarantees
• Focused on capital cost, efficiency & reliability……lowering COE
14 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC Reference Plant
Reference Plant Design Basis
• Two 7FB GTs + 1 ST CC system
- SCRs included
• Two gasification trains
• Base load/Load following operation
• Turndown to ~50% load (2 gasif. opr.)
• Fuel flexibility
– Wide range of bituminous coals
– Nominal 4% sulfur, 14% ash,
2,500 ppm chlorides
– Up to 30% coke blends w/ coal
• Natural gas or distillate backup fuel
• Allows for addition of future CO2
capture equipment
Reference Plant Performance
• Nominal 630MW net plant output,
• 5ppmv NOX w/SCR, 15 ppmv w/o SCR
• Availability target ~85% on syngas
Reference Plant Options
• Up to 70% coke blends w/ coal
• Higher sulfur/Chlorides feedstock
• Zero liquid discharge
• Spare gasifier train
15 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC: Emissions Approaching Natural Gas
0.16
PM10
SO2
NOX
Lb/MMBTU
0.15
0.10
0.05
Average Recent
Permit Data
0.09
0.04
0.03
Best Individual
Plant
0.017
0.00
0.02
0.01 0.01
0.01
0.01
0.002
Hg % Captured
90%+
50%-90%
PC IGCC
Hg
30-40%
Less
NGCC
Advanced IGCC
Source: GE internal data, average of 30 permits
PC/SCPC
granted, applications and publicly reported
emissions
IGCC Environmental Benefits Versus
Supercritical Pulverized Coal
• 33% less NOX
• 75% less SOX
• 40% less PM10
• 90% + Hg removal
• 30% less water
• CO2 capture ready
PC IGCC
Water Usage
1,861 1,822
lb/MWh
40%
Efficiency
PC IGCC
CO2 Emissions
16 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC & SCPC…Benchmarking Capital Cost
• IGCC alliance benchmarked SCPC price for Ohio River Valley 1Q/05
• Greenfield 600 MW SCPC ~1,400 to 1,460 $/kW ORV
• IGCC/SCPC Brownfield savings vary ~150 to 250 $/kW
• IGCC capital cost premium has been ~ 20-25%
1 x 600 MW SCPC
Greenfield - $1,450/kW
Brownfield - $1,225/kW
EPC Cost Index, $/kW
1,800
1,600
Greenfield Projects
1,400
1,200
Greenfield Projects
Brownfield Projects
1,000
800
500
600
700
800
900
Nominal Plant Capacity, MW
1st Quarter 2005 – Ohio River Valley Cost Estimate Basis
17 / GE /
/
June17
2006
Reducing the Capital Cost of IGCC
• Launch target to cut IGCC CAPEX premium by 50%
• Optimizing power generation and gasification integration
• Incorporating lessons for operability and lower cost
• Establishing supply chain relationships
Total installed cost (TIC) of IGCC
Increased
Output
System
Optimization Schedule/
Materials
SCPC – TIC $/kW
Reference plant target
reduces IGCC premium
by 50%
Alliance on
IGCC
track to deliver
IGCC launch
product savings
~
~
Conventional IGCC
20-25% premium
$/kW
Reference Plant
Target
18 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC Cost of Electricity Versus Supercritical
• Plant output: 600 MW
Pulverized Coal
• SCPC price: $1,450/kW (Greenfield)
Cost of Electricity, ¢/kWh
8.29
8
7
CO2
PRB
PRB
5.21
SCPC
4
IGCC 10% CAPEX premium
First year cost of electricity in 2005
Fuel: IL #6 price $1.75/MMBtu
Availability (SCPC 90%, IGCC 85%)
Emissions: $3,500/ton NOX, $750/ton SO2
6.90
CO2
6
5
•
•
•
•
•
5.64
5.66
SCPC
IGCC
SCPC
SCPC
Base
NOX/SO2
Hg
Total
IGCC
Cost for CO2 capture – DOE/EPRI Report 1000316, 12/2000
GE internal data
19 / GE /
June 2006
GE and Bechtel IGCC Alliance’s Reference Plant
True Single Point Responsibility
Customer
IGCC Project
Contract Scope
• EPC Firm Price w/
Guaranteed:
– Schedule
– Output
GE Lead
GE/Bechtel Project Consortium
Turnkey EPC Contract
GE Energy
Bechtel Power
– Heat Rate
– Air Emissions
• Minimizes Owner Risk
• Facilitates Project
Financing
20 / GE /
June 2006
GE’s Commitment to Success
Staffing For Growth
Product Development Budget
~200+
$40Y
(est.)
~117
$20Y
$15Y
~50
$Y
Avg/yr ‘05
‘01–‘04
‘06
‘07
Jun
04
Sep
05
Jan
06
Dec
06
Gasification Programs
• High Efficiency Sulfur Removal • Syngas Cooler Advanced Design
• Advanced Quench Ring
• Advanced Feed Injectors
• Advanced Refractory
• Low Rank Coal Design
21 / GE /
June 2006
GE’s Global Gasification Resources
Houston, TX – Process design & industry experience
Niskayuna, NY – Materials, design, system analysis
Schenectady, NY – Engineering & project mgmt
Shanghai, China – Materials, chemistry, instrumentation
Bangalore, India – Computational analysis
Greenville, SC – Design, test & manufacture
Irvine, CA – Gasification modeling
22 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC Launch Plant Status
Gary
Fort Wayne
Cleveland
INDIANA
OHIO
Indianapolis
Columbus
Cincinnati
Meigs County,
Ohio
AEP IGCC Project
Edwardsport,
Indiana
Duke IGCC Project
• 2Q‘05 completed IGCC feasibility study
• 2Q‘05 completed IGCC feasibility study
• 9/05 announced FEED study
• 03/06 announced FEED study
• 3Q06 FEED to be complete
• 1Q07 FEED to be complete
• 2010 expected commercial start up*
• 2011 expected commercial start up*
*pending project approval
23 / GE /
June 2006
IGCC Reference Plant Project Phases
Site
Study
Indicative
FEED
Front-end engineering
Price
Performance
Schedule
EPC terms
Perf. Guarantees
Firm
EPC
Phase
Price
Performance
Schedule
EPC Contract
Perf. Guarantees
Start-up &
Operation
Deliver
Availability
Technical Support
Large IB Feedback
Alliance Commitment
Performance
24 / GE /
/
June24
2006
Why IGCC Makes Sense
• Proven technology - commercial
operation today
• Fuel flexibility – lower cost fuels than
natural gas
• Better emissions performance than
pulverized coal – current & future
• Comparable COE – at launch
• Energy security – domestic coal
supplies
• Public acceptance – competitive
cleaner coal alternative
25 / GE /
June 2006
Gasification – Multiple Cleaner Coal
Solutions
Greenfield
Polygen
Refueling
Site Repowering
Electricity (IGCC)
Hydrogen
Refineries
Syngas
Power
(H2 + CO)
Gasification
Technology
Steam
Chemicals
Coal to Liquids
Formaldehyde
MTBE
Methanol
Acetic acid
Amine
DME
Urea
Ammonia
Ammonia nitrate/sulfate
Oxochemicals: Butanol, Ethylhexanol
Cleaner Diesel
26 / GE /
June 2006
GE
Energy
Delivering the
IGCC Solution
Daniel Tse
June 29, 2006