THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Transforming The U.S. Health System: What Needs To Be Done & Your Role Stephen C.
Download ReportTranscript THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Transforming The U.S. Health System: What Needs To Be Done & Your Role Stephen C.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Transforming The U.S. Health System: What Needs To Be Done & Your Role Stephen C. Schoenbaum, MD, MPH Executive Vice President for Programs www.cmwf.org Mountainside Hospital February 8, 2007 What We’ll Cover • Introduction to The Commonwealth Fund and The Commission on a High Performance Health System • Goals for a high performance health system • Where we stand now • Keys to transforming the health system • What you can do THE COMMONWEALTH FUND The Commonwealth Fund Established in 1918, The Commonwealth Fund (www.cmwf.org) is a private national foundation that aims to promote a high performing health care system by supporting independent research on health care issues and making grants to improve health care practice and policy. THE COMMONWEALTH FUND The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System Chairman: James J. Mongan, M.D. President and CEO Partners HealthCare System, Inc. Objective: • Move the U.S. toward a higher-performing health care system that achieves better access, improved quality, and greater efficiency, with particular focus on the most vulnerable due to income, gaps in insurance coverage, race and ethnicity, health, or age THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Goals for a High Performance Health System HIGH QUALITY, SAFE, COMPASSIONATE, ACCESS AND EQUITY FOR ALL COORDINATED CARE LONG, HEALTHY, AND PRODUCTIVE LIVES EFFICIENCY CAPACITY FOR SYSTEM AND WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND IMPROVEMENT THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Scores: Dimensions of a High Performance Health System 0 Long, Healthy, & Productive Lives 69 Quality 71 Access Efficiency 67 51 Equity OVERALL SCORE 71 66 THE COMMONWEALTH FUND SOURCE: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2006 LONG, HEALTHY & PRODUCTIVE LIVES Mortality Amenable to Health Care Mortality from causes considered amenable to health care is deaths before age 75 that are potentially preventable with timely and appropriate medical care. Deaths per 100,000 population* International Variation, 1998 150 State Variation, 2002 129 130 132 106 107 109 109 134 119 115 115 110 103 97 97 99 100 75 81 84 88 88 88 92 90 84 50 Fr an ce Ja pa n Sp a Sw in ed en I Au taly st ra Ca lia na d No a Ne r th w a er y la nd s G re G e ce er m an y A Ne us w Ze tria al a De nd Un n ite ma rk d St at Fi es nl an Un d I ite re l d Ki and ng do Po m rtu ga l 0 U .A .S e ag r ve h t 10 t 25 h M n ia d e h t 75 h t 90 Percentiles THE COMMONWEALTH FUND U.S. Adults Receive Half of Recommended Care; Quality Varies Significantly by Medical Condition Percent of recommended care received 76 80 60 65 55 54 45 40 39 23 20 0 Overall Breast Hypertension Asthma Diabetes Pneumonia Hip Fracture Cancer Source: E. McGlynn et al. 2003. "The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States," The New England Journal of Medicine 248(26): 2635–2645. THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Patients Reporting Any Error by Number of Doctors Seen in Past Two Years Percent 75 1 doctor 48 50 25 4 or more doctors 40 37 12 35 31 15 14 14 28 22 12 0 AUS CAN GER NZ UK US THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 2005 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey ACCESS: UNIVERSAL PARTICIPATION Number of States with High Proportion of Uninsured Adults Ages 18–64 Is Growing 1999–2000 2004–2005 NH NH ME VT WA MT NH WA ND VT OR ID NY WI SD MI WY PA IA NE UT OH IN NV CA IL CO MA KS MO WV VA KY NJ RI CT MN OR ID MI PA IA NE CA IL CO KS MO AZ NM MS TX AL DE MD DC NC AZ GA NM OK SC AR MS LA TX AL GA LA FL AK VA NJ RI CT TN SC AR WV KY TN OK OH IN NV UT MA NY WI SD WY DE MD DC NC ME ND MT MN FL AK HI 23% or more 19%–22.9% HI 14%–18.9% Less than 14% Data: Two-year averages 1999–2000 and 2004–2005 from the Census Bureau’s March 2000, 2001 and 2005, 2006 Current Population Surveys. Estimates by the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Source: The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2006 THE COMMONWEALTH FUND EFFICIENCY Quality and Costs of Care for Medicare Patients Hospitalized for Heart Attacks, Colon Cancer and Hip Fractures, by Hospital Referral Regions, 2000-2002 Quality of Care* (1 Year Survival Index, Median = 70%) 1.20 Median Relative Resource Use = $25,995 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 Relative Resource Use** * Indexed to risk-adjusted 1 year survival rate (median = 0.70). ** Risk-adjusted spending on hospital and physician services using standardized national prices. Data: E. Fisher and D. Staiger, Dartmouth College analysis of data from a 20% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Source: The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2006 THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Variation in Annual Total Cost and Quality for Chronic Disease Patients Quality of Care* and Medicare Spending for Beneficiaries with Three Chronic Conditions, by Hospital Referral Region 1.60 Average Quality of Care Score 1.40 Best Practice Curve Greenville, NC Ft. Lauderdale, FL East Long Island, NY Orange County, CA Hackensack, NJ 1.20 Manhattan, NY New Brunswick, NJ Camden, NJ 1.00 Newark, NJ 0.80 Saginaw, MI 0.60 0.40 Median Amount Spent per Patient per HRR = $28,694 0.20 0.00 $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 Average Annual Reimbursement per Beneficiary (Wage-Index Adjusted) THE COMMONWEALTH FUND EFFICIENCY International Comparison of Spending on Health, 1980– 2004 Average spending on health Total expenditures on health per capita ($US PPP) 7000 6000 United States Germany Canada France Australia United Kingdom as percent of GDP 16 14 12 5000 10 4000 8 3000 6 2000 4 19 80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 20 00 20 02 20 04 0 2 0 19 80 19 82 19 84 19 86 19 88 19 90 19 92 19 94 19 96 19 98 20 00 20 02 20 04 1000 United States Germany Canada France Australia United Kingdom Data: OECD Health Data 2005 and 2006. Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2006 THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 13 EFFICIENCY Percentage of National Health Expenditures Spent on Health Administration and Insurance, 2003 Net costs of health administration and health insurance as percent of national health expenditures 8 7.3 5.6 6 4.8 4.1 4.0 4 4.2 3.3 St at es m an y U ni te d G er er la n Sw itz ra lia us t ria A et h N in g K d * U ni te us t do m da an a d c b C pa n Ja d Fi nl an Fr an ce a A 0 nd s 1.9 2 2.6 2.1 er la 2.1 THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Source: The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2006 The Discourse Has Changed FROM: • “Americans have the best health care system in the world” – President Bush, State of the Union Speech, 2004 TO: • We need to do better – We spend more on health care than any other country – We need more value for what we are spending THE COMMONWEALTH FUND We Know The Problems Now We Need Solutions THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Keys to Transforming the U.S. Health Care System 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Guarantee affordable health insurance coverage Implement major quality and safety improvements Work toward a more organized delivery system that emphasizes primary and preventive care and is patient-centered Increase transparency and reporting on quality and costs Expand the use of interoperable information technology Reward performance on quality and efficiency Encourage public-private collaboration to achieve simplification, more effective change THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Guarantee Affordable Health Insurance Coverage 1. Guarantee Affordable Health Insurance Coverage THE COMMONWEALTH FUND What Are the Most Important Health Care Issues for Presidential and Congressional Action? Percent listing issue as first or second priority: Total Less than $50,000 $50,000– $74,999 $75,000 or more Ensure that all Americans have adequate, reliable health insurance 52 56 52 50 Control the rising cost of medical care 37 35 42 39 Lower the cost of prescription drugs 31 31 27 33 Ensure that Medicare remains financially sound in the longterm 29 29 32 30 Improve the quality of nursing homes and long-term care 14 16 15 13 Reform the medical malpractice system 14 10 12 18 Reduce the complexity of insurance 12 12 10 10 Source: C. Schoen, S.K. How, I. Weinbaum, J.E. Craig, Jr., and K. Davis, “Public Views on Shaping the Future of the U.S. Health System,” The Commonwealth Fund, August 2006. THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Why Do We Need Universal Coverage? • Waste – cost-shifting – ineffective care (poorer adherence) – duplication – back-end vs. front-end care • Societal benefit It’s Not Just Altruism THE COMMONWEALTH FUND The Action Now Lies In States • Single payer isn’t likely • Common elements – Expand public programs (cover more poor people) – Require individual participation – Require employer participation THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Massachusetts Health Plan • MassHealth expansion for children up to 300% Federal Poverty Level; adults up to 100% FPL • Individual mandate, with affordability provision; subsidies between 100% and 300% of poverty • Employer mandatory offer, employee mandatory take-up • Employer assessment ($295 if employer doesn’t provide health insurance) • “Connector” to organize affordable insurance offerings through a group pool Source: John Holahan, “The Basics of Massachusetts Health Reform,” Presentation to United Hospital Fund, April 2006. THE COMMONWEALTH FUND California Governor’s Proposal • Individual mandate • Premium subsidies for adults below 250% federal poverty level • Employer offer health insurance or pay 4% of wages into pool • Provider fee assessment (2% of physician revenues to 4% of hospital revenues) • Insurance market regulation – Guaranteed issue – Community rating with age bands – 85 percent minimum medical loss ratio THE COMMONWEALTH FUND • Effective May, 2006: New law in New Jersey allowing persons up to age 30 to be covered under their parents’ insurance THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Implement Major Quality and Safety Improvements 1. Guarantee Affordable Health Insurance Coverage 2. Implement Major Quality and Safety Improvements THE COMMONWEALTH FUND CCU / MICU Aggregate Central Line Infection Data 9 8 7 NNIS CCU/M ICU PRHI Richard Shannon, MD Initiate PRHI /TPS Proce ss 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2003 Allegheny General Hospital 2004 Highmark “Quality Blue” Year 4 MRSA UPMC FY 2006 (Oct. - March) Hospital Acquired MRSA Case Trending FY 2006 Hosp. Acq. MRSA Cases 25 20 15 10 5 0 Baseline OCT. 2005 NOV. 2005 DEC. 2005 JAN. 2006 FEB. 2006 MAR. 2006 Presbyterian CTICU 10 1 2 1 2 1 1 Shadyside MICU 7 1 1 0 0 0 3 McKeesport Med-Surg 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 St. Margaret Med-Surg Teach 6 2 2 1 1 3 0 Totals 24 4 5 2 3 4 5 Institute for Healthcare Improvement 100K Lives Campaign: Success Story THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Patient-Centered Hospital Care: Staff Managed Pain, Responded When Needed Help, and Explained Medicines, 2005 Percent of patients reporting “always” Average Best Hospital 10th %ile Hospitals 100 93 100 90th %ile Hospitals 91 79 74 70 61 50 70 63 52 60 49 0 Staff managed pain well * Staff responded when needed Staff explained medicines and help ** side effects*** THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Reid Hospital; Richmond, Indiana 2004 HQA Ave. AMI:ACEI when appropriate CHF: LV assessment 75 Reid Hospital Q4 2004 100 78 99 CAP: Pneumococcal Vaccine 46 100 THE COMMONWEALTH FUND