Comments on HWP estimation methods Ken Skog Kim Pingoud Methods Topics Method types Applicability of methods to approaches Data needs and availability Components(variables)
Download ReportTranscript Comments on HWP estimation methods Ken Skog Kim Pingoud Methods Topics Method types Applicability of methods to approaches Data needs and availability Components(variables)
Comments on HWP estimation methods Ken Skog Kim Pingoud Methods Topics Method types Applicability of methods to approaches Data needs and availability Components(variables) needed to estimate for any approach Methods Types Flux data – Input from surveys – Output: a) Use lifetimes to estimate outputs b) Use surveys to estimate outputs Stock data c) Estimate stock change between two inventories Methods Applicability Stock Change Atmospheric Flow Production Flux using lifetimes Need domestic life times Need domestic lifetimes Need domestic and export lifetimes Flux using surveys of emissions Partial domestic coverage (not all emissions can be surveyed) (means to verify) Partial domestic coverage (not all emissions can be surveyed) (means to verify) Difficult need to separate domestic emissions survey into domestic and import wood sources Stock change Partial coverage (e.g. buildings in country) (means to verify) Partial coverage (e.g. buildings in country) (means to verify Difficult need to separate inventory change into domestic and import wood sources Potential incomplete coverage of secondary wood products Potential incomplete coverage of secondary wood products Complete coverage for secondary products exports Notes Data Availability Data Sources Harvest, production, trade FAO, country data Conversion factors IPCC Forest GPG, country data Lifetime for products in use Limited – previous studies Need work validating against surveys of inventory Disposition after use Limited – need national estimates (possible aid from waste sector) SWDS decay limits / lifetimes IPCC Waste sector guidelines & GPG Variables needed to estimate for any approach Stock Change reporting format Emissions reporting format Annual stock change Stock Atmospheric Production or flow change flow ∆A Forest stock change + + + Annual stock change or flow Forest stock change + + + + + + Emissions from domestic products EB (from domestic RW) - - - Emissions from imported products - - ∆A H Domestic harvest Stock change in Domestic products ∆B (from domestic roundwood) + + stock change in Imported products + + ∆C Stock change in Exported products ∆D (from domestic roundwood) + EC + Stock Atmospheric Production change flow Emissions from exported products ED (from domestic RW) - I Imported products - I Imported products + Ex Exported products + Ex Exported products - TOTAL forest and HWP change SC AF P TOTAL forest and HWP change SC AF P Harvested Wood Products: Stocks and flows EB EC ED ATMOSPHERE E NEE Own Country A Forest ecosystems H E E EX DOM E IM DOM Abroad B HWP C D HWP in use in use or in waste sites or in waste PEX Ex I PIM sites EX OTH Harvested Wood Products: Comparison of Approaches U.S. HWP Removals in 2002 = 59 Tg C Variables from U.S. HWP Estimation Methods Tg C Stock Change or Flow Variables A Domestic Product Stock Change (from domestic RW) 58 B Exported Product Stock Change (from domestic RW) 1 C Imported Product Stock Change 10 D Flow of imports 13 E Flow of exports 7 Approaches: Production (A+B) = 59 Stock Change (A+C) = 68 Atmospheric Flow (A + C – (D – E)) = 62