Transcript MAPA Summary of February 2010 Survey Survey Results A second MAPA survey was administered in February 2010 to DoDEA assistant principals, principals, assistant superintendents, and superintendents •Approximately.

MAPA
Summary of
February 2010 Survey
Survey Results
A second MAPA survey was administered in
February 2010 to DoDEA assistant principals,
principals, assistant superintendents, and
superintendents
•Approximately six months into
implementation
•244 respondents -- 65% response rate
Feedback through Surveys
We asked…
You said…
Clarity of levels of
Overwhelming majority
performance within the indicated that the rubric is
rubric
clear
Confidence in selecting or A substantial number of
determining evidence to
respondents were
support each objective
confident
Number of objectives
Slightly more than half felt
obtainable each rating
they could meet all or
cycle
almost all
Survey… What you said!
We asked…
You said…
Do you have responsibilities
not covered by the rubrics?
The majority of respondents
indicated “no”
Duties perceived as not covered by MAPA:
•Non-academic duties such as lunch, bus, or playground duty;
discipline issues; extra-curricular activities; or time spent with
parents.
Refer to Objective 4.2
•Special Education issues such as IEP and Case Study Meetings
were also mentioned.
Refer to 1.3 and 4.2
Facilities and safety concerns
Refer to 2.3
•Supervision of staff
Refer to 2.3
Survey… What you said!
We asked…
You said…
Clarity of purpose and
process for the ILP
Respondents overall felt
very clear or clear
Development of the ILP
Majority reported that they
designed their own ILP,
some reported a
collaborative process, but
10% reported that their ILP
was directed
Survey… What you said!
We asked…
You said…
Number of revisions required
of the ILP
The majority indicated their ILP
was approved with one or no
revision
Reasons for revising the ILP:
Clarification of goals, more specificity, more data-driven, more
focus on instructional leadership, more measurable
Measures of success for you •TerraNova
ILP
•DRA
•Student progress
•Anecdotal data
Survey… What you said!
We asked…
You said…
Need for training on the ILP Slightly over 1/3 indicated a
strong or very strong need
Procedural issues that have arisen since the
implementation of MAPA:
•Timing
•Lack of professional development associated with
implementation
•Efficient methods to gather and document evidence;
time to do so
•Lack of guidance and mentoring
Survey… What you said!
We asked…
You said…
What do you like most •ILP
about the MAPA?
•Rubrics
•Focused on
instructional leadership
• Goals & objectives are
specific
• Comprehensive
• Rigor
Survey… What you said!
We asked…
What do you like
least about the
MAPA?
You said…
•Cumbersome
•Time consuming
•Excludes many routine
activities
•Concern regarding the
ability to reach “Exemplary”
Survey… What you said!
MAPA Task Group
• Answering the call for further professional
development
• Responding to the need to complete an
entire cycle before collecting more data via a
survey
Next Steps
Kaizen
September- October, 2010 – administer survey after
cycle has ended
 Analyze results, strengths, and deficiencies
September– October 2010 - evaluate E-MAPA
(automated, paperless application pilot)
 Determine improvements needed
 Complete and test changes
 Determine capability for DoDEA-wide
implementation
 Implement throughout DoDEA
Next Steps
Kaizen
September– October 2010 –
administer survey after cycle has
ended
September– October 2010 -evaluate E-MAPA
Next Steps