Global Issues in Comparing Vaccination Strategies Dr Lara Wolfson Vaccine Assessment & Monitoring Department of Immunization, Vaccines & Biologicals.

Download Report

Transcript Global Issues in Comparing Vaccination Strategies Dr Lara Wolfson Vaccine Assessment & Monitoring Department of Immunization, Vaccines & Biologicals.

Global Issues in
Comparing
Vaccination
Strategies
Dr Lara Wolfson
Vaccine Assessment &
Monitoring
Department of
Immunization, Vaccines &
Biologicals
Vaccination Strategies: WHO
• Overview of work at WHO
• Examples of current work
• Unmet needs
Measuring Mortality and Morbidity
1.
2.
3.
4.
Estimates of current disease
burden for vaccinepreventable diseases
Forecasts of future disease
burden & cost-effectiveness
under different vaccination
scenarios
Methods and Materials to
assist RO’s and countries in
estimation and forecasting of
disease burden, introduction of
new vaccines, costeffectiveness assessments
Support to users of burden of
disease data, technical
assistance for costeffectiveness
Innovation
Accelerated
Disease
Control
Immunization
Systems
Estimating (Total) Mortality at WHO
Complete vital
registration
Age-specific
mortality rates
DHS and other
surveys
No recent data
UN estimates
Incomplete vital
registration
Sample registration
system
Censuses
Independent
studies / reports /
models
5q0
45q15
Life tables
UN population
estimates
All-cause mortality
envelope by age and sex
Epidemiological data from
studies, verbal autopsies,
WHO programme
estimates (child, maternal,
injuries, noncommunicable, TB,
HIV/AIDS)
Cause-specific
mortality patterns
Country level age,
sex and cause
specific mortality
estimates
Vaccine-Preventable Diseases: 24%
PertussisTetanus
Diphtheria 0.52% 0.37%
0.01%
Mening A/C
0.05%
Polio JE
0.00%0.02%
YF
0.05%
Hib
0.68%
Rotavirus
0.79%
Hepatitis B
1.05%
Measles
1.07%
Malaria
2.23%
Diarrhoea
(other)
TB
2.37%
2.75%
Pneumococcal
2.83%
ALRI (Other)
3.56%
Other
76.77%
HIV
4.87%
Causes of 4.1 M Child Deaths, 2002
YF, Diphtheria,
Polio, Hepatitis B
0%
Malaria
29%
Tetanus
5%
Pertussis
7%
Hib
9%
HIV
9%
Measles
13%
TB
1%
Meningococcal
A/C, JE
<1%
Rotavirus
10%
Pneumococcal
17%
Proportional Mortality Approaches
Overall mortality
Noninfectious
Infectious
Diarrhoea
ARI
Croup
Acute bronchitis
Pneumonia
Viral
RSV
Bacterial
Influenza
S. pneumoniae
Hib
Natural History Approaches
Population
Susceptible
Exposed
Infected
Hib
Unexposed
Non infected
No access to health care
Access to health care
Untreated pneumonia
Treated pneumonia
Bacterial
Viral
S. pneumoniae
Non susceptible
Looking at all the sources of data
Method 1
Best estimate
Method 2
Method 3
Sensitivity analysis
General Approach
• Get best data/information (literature/grey literature review)
• Primary data
• Secondary data
• Seek expert advise/opinion
• natural history of the disease
• methods/models
• context
• Develop consultative process with ROs/countries
• Develop best methods/models
• Use best assumptions/probabilities
• Conduct sensitivity analysis
• Validate/check consistency & coherence
• Document (explicit & transparent)
• Subject to in-house review, then expert review
Expected Outputs
• Burden of Disease Estimates
– By country, age group, sex, year
– With estimates of uncertainty, document methods
– Country consultation, continuous update of inputs
(?!?)
• "Scenarios" (aka Comparing Strategies)
– Recommendations for best practice
– Tools for use at country level
– Provide support to advocacy efforts
• Cost-Effectiveness
– Tools and guidelines, training, support
HQ produces burden
of disease estimates
Publish methods, database
Of results, inputs
Country clearance
Simultaneous
Develop scenario models
And database of inputs
Publish tools
Country
Requests
CEA
assistance
Develop costing tools and
guidelines
IF!
Targeted
Country for
Field-testing
or
Evaluation
Collaborate with country
On CEA
Update
annually
Publish tools
GAVI and the Vaccine Fund
• 75 out of 192 member states with GNI
<$1000 eligible for support
• Immunization Systems Strengthening
(ISS) support –performance/reward based
system
• New Vaccine Support (NVS) – vaccine
provided for 1st five years
• "Next Window" – 2005-2009
• ICF (Investment Case Framework)
The ADIP Paradigm
The Example: Measles
• Need to develop a method for estimating
measles mortality and morbidity
• Measure progress towards Measles Mortality
Reduction Goal (50% reduction in measles
deaths from 1999-2005)
• Evaluate the impact of supplemental
immunization activities (SIA’s) and routine
coverage
• Develop a tool for countries to use to estimate
their own disease burden and monitor progress
"Current" Burden of Measles
1  (1  VE1  MCV1 )  (1  VE1  MCV2 ) 
Protected Year i
= (1  VE1 100%  SIAi )  (1  VE1  90%  SIAi 1 ) 
(1  VE1  80%  SIAi  2 )
CasesAll Ages
 Births  (1  Protected Year i )
Year i
CasesAge Group j
Year i
DeathsAge Group j
Year i
Protected <80% Protected >80% Age Group 


12%
12%
<1
Ages

  CasesAll
Year i

65%
47%
1 to 4 
= 

18%
25%
5
to
9



4%
11%
10 to 14 


1%
5%
15
to
19


 CasesAge j  CFRAge Group j
Year i
CFR Literature Review
Summary Data (with confidence intervals): 12 to 23 Age Group
C ou ntr y ( N )
Ke ny a N =2
Th aila nd N =1
Ethiop ia N =1
Gha na N =1
Guine a- Bis s au N =6
N ig er N =2
Zimba bw e N =1
Se ne ga l N =7
Gamb ia N =6
Malaw i N =2
C ha d N =1
Bu r un di N =1
Ph illipine s N =1
D R C o ng o N =1
My a nma r N =3
N ig er ia N =1
Pe r u N =2
In dia N =3 3
Pa k is tan N =1
Ba ng la de s h N =6
So malia N =1
Za mbia N =1
Mar s ha ll Is la nd s N =1
Sr i L an k a N =2
N ew Ze aland N =1
0
10
20
30
C FR
40
50
869,000 in 1999 to 610,000 in 2002
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
Millions of Deaths
3.0
Deaths
Averted
Measles: Comparing Vaccination Strategies
in 35 African Countries, 2005-2015
Annual Deaths (thousands)
(Thousands)
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Constant Routine
Constant Routine + 2nd Opportunity
Best Estimates Routine
Best Estimates Routine + 2nd Opportunity (Project)
Reaching 90% Routine
Reaching 90% Routine + 2nd Oppportunity
SIR Model for 192 Member States
dS dS

da dt
dI dI

da dt
dR dR

da dt
where
  (a, t ) 1  p (a, t )    (a, t ) S (a, t )   (a, t ) S (a, t )  (1  p (a, t )) S (a, t )
  (a, t ) S (a, t )   (a, t ) I (a, t )   (a, t ) I (a, t )
  (a, t ) I (a, t )   (a, t ) R (a, t )  (1  p (a, t )) S (a, t )
 ( a, t )
 ( a, t )
 The "birth rate" (increase in population) of age a at time t
p ( a, t )
 The immunization rate of age group a at time t
 The force of infection for age group a at time t
 (a, t )  The "death rate" (decrease in population) of age a at time t
 (a, t )  The death rate (due to all causes) among those infected with
measles of age a at time t
 ( a, t )
 The recovery rate for age group a at time t
How to calculate R0?
 t  
R0,t 

1 

 Popt 
Casest  Immigrant Infections
where
R0,t

R0,t 1 



Density t .3
Density t-1


Looking at Scenarios
Disease/syndrome
Measles - static model
Lit
review
Data
extracte
d
Model
develop
ed
Current
Estimat
es
Estimat
es
Deaths/
Cases
Averted
WHO
Clearan
ce
Expert
review
Methods
written
partial
partial
complet
ed
complet
ed
complet
ed
complet
ed
complet
ed
completed
complet
ed
complet
ed
complet
ed
complet
ed
complet
ed
yes
NA
NA
complet
ed
complet
ed
Country
review
process
complet
ed
Manuscript
submitted
complet
ed
Measles - SIR model
Measles - prop model
Pertussis
Polio
Neonatal tetanus
NA
completed
complet
ed
Q1 2004
Maternal tetanus
Q2 2004
Q2 2004
Q4 2004
Q2 2004
Q2 2004
Q4 2004
Q2 2004
Q2 2004
Q2 2004
Total tetanus
Hepatitis B
Q1 2004
Q1 2004
Hib meningitis
Q3 2004
Hib pneumonia
Q1 2004
Q1 2004
Q1 2004
Q3 2004
Q1 2004
Publish
ed
Q3 2004
Work that is needed (urgently!!)
High Priority/Some Work
Started
• Pneumococcal Disease
(Meningitis, Pneumonia)
• Rotavirus
• Yellow Fever
• Rubella/CRS
• Diphtheria
Lower Priority/Not Started
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Meningoccocus A/C
Japanese Encephalitis
Mumps
Dengue
Typhoid
Cholera
ETEC
Papillomavirus
RSV
Shigella
Streptococcus group A
Infant TB
CEA
Disease
Costing
Tools
Costing studies
completed
Costing studies in
progress
Measles
Yes
Burkina Faso, Kenya,
Tanzania, Laos,
Zambia, Rwanda
Sudan, Nepal, Philippines,
Afghanistan, Kazakhstan,
Turkey, Kosovo
Pakistan
Indonesia
Neonatal
Tetanus
Hepatitis B
Yes
Hib
Yes
Moscow, Albania, Thailand
Rubella
In progress
Oman, Fiji, Tonga
Pneumococcal
Yes
South Africa, Kenya
Polio
Rotavirus
Mozambique, Mongolia
South Africa
In progress
Ghana
Data Collected by the Global
Monitoring System (VAM)
Incidence and Coverage 1980-2001 (5 yr MA)
Complete Incidence Reporting Only
Coverage
Incide nce
80 10 0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 0 20 0
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
60
30%
40
20%
0
20
10%
0%
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
Incidence per 100,000 Population Aged 0-19
19
96
19
97
19
98
Coverage
19
99
20
00
20
01
Mixed Bag of Needs
• Simple tools for use in country to make
policy decisions – but validated compared
to complex methods.
• Valid assessments of current burden of
disease (MDG!!)
• Guidance on plugging "data holes"
• Introduction of new vaccines