Quality of RH Medicines: Update from WHO Prequalification of Medicines Programme and beyond. 4 October 2012, Paris Dr Lembit Rägo Coordinator Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Essential.

Download Report

Transcript Quality of RH Medicines: Update from WHO Prequalification of Medicines Programme and beyond. 4 October 2012, Paris Dr Lembit Rägo Coordinator Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Essential.

Quality of RH Medicines: Update from WHO Prequalification of Medicines Programme and beyond.

4 October 2012, Paris

Dr Lembit Rägo Coordinator Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines Essential Medicines and Pharmaceutical Policies World Health Organization Geneva [email protected]

1

Content

• Context and links with other WHO activities • What is prequalification programme (PQP): • Overview of the programme activities • Specifics of RH medicines Challenges and a way forward • What it can offer to the regulators and industries?

• Conclusions

2

• The

Millennium Development Goals

(MDGs): • Eight international

development goals

that 192 United Nations member states and at least 23 international organizations have agreed to achieve by the year 2015

3

Medicines work in WHO HQ

Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products (EMP)

– Three teams for medicines work • •

Quality Assurance and Safety: Medicines (QSM)

Medicines Access and Rational Use (MAR) • Medicine Programme Coordination (MPC) • Collaboration with other clusters/departments/programmes/units in HQ – Vaccines and biologicals (IVB/QSS) –

Vaccines prequalification programme

– EMP –

Diagnostics prequalification programme

– Disease oriented programs (HIV/AIDS, malaria, TB, neglected diseases) • Collaboration with WHO regional and country offices

4

QSM Technical Programmes

• International Nonproprietary Names (INNs) • Quality Assurance • Safety/Pharmacovigilance • Regulatory support •

Prequalification Programme for Medicines

• Quality Assurance and Safety of Blood Products and Related Biologicals • Anti SFFC (anticounterfeiting)

5

Active collaboration with other international, regional and national organizations

• UN family, international organizations and donors: – UNICEF, UNFPA, UNIDO etc.

– BMGF, Global Fund, UNITAID – Manufacturers associations – MSF • Regional – –

EMA/EU Council of Europe/EDQM

– NEPAD • • Professional and scientific – FIP, CIOMS, IUPHAR, ISPE

National level

National Medicines Regulatory Authorities

States) (from all WHO Member

6

Prequalification of Medicines Programme

 The UN Prequalification Programme managed by WHO is ensuring that medicines procured with international funds are of assessed and inspected for

quality, efficacy and safety

, involves Prequalification programme for medicines (finished dosage forms) Prequalification of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) Prequalification of quality control (QC) laboratories  The Prequalification Programme is an action plan for expanding access to priority essential medicines in the following four areas: - HIV/AIDS - Tuberculosis - Malaria - Reproductive Health - Selected individual products for other diseases (Flu, Zinc sulphate)

7

Extensive collaboration with regulators

• Not duplicating work done be stringent regulatory authorities – SRA approval of new and generic products – abridged procedure – US FDA tentative approvals – based on confidentiality agreement including in the PQ products list – European Medicines Agency (EMA) – Art 58 … and beyond – Collaboration with EDQM, in particular in the area of APIs (confidentiality agreements with US FDA, EDQM, EMA …) • Active participation and involvement of – SRA experts – Regulatory authority experts from less resourced settings

8

http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/en/ or http://apps.who.int/prequal/ 9

Steps in the process

10

Medicines Prequalification Process

Expression of Interest Assessment Product dossier SMF Inspections Additional information and data Corrective actions Compliance Compliance Handling of complaints Prequalification Monitoring Dossier maintenance (variations) 11

Transparency

• Very comprehensive web site • Guidance for applicants – Technical guidelines – Guidance on specific issues (comparator products etc.) • List of products prequalified and in pipeline • WHO Public Assessment Reports (WHO-PARs) • WHO Public Inspection Reports (WHO-PIRs) • Notice of Concern (NOC) documents • News, announcements for public meetings etc.

12

Transparency – dossiers and their status information on the web

13

Transparency

WHO Public Assessment Reports (WHOPARs): a lot of information

14

Transparency - WHOPIRs and NOCs

• • • These are published in response to the WHA Resolution WHA57.14 of 22 May 2004, which requested WHO, among other actions: –

"3. (4) to ensure that the prequalification review process and the results of inspection and assessment reports of the listed products, aside from proprietary and confidential information, are made publicly available;"

A WHO Public Inspection Report (WHOPIR)

provides a summary of the inspection (where found to be GMP complaint)

A Notice of Concern (NOC)

is a letter reflecting areas of concern where the non-compliances require urgent attention and corrective action by the manufacturer or contract research organization.

15

API prequalification developing

Note:

as per today 12 different Chinese API manufacturers with 14 applications for individual API Prequalification received. None yet prequalified as applications relatively recent

16

17

Service Delivery: Assessors

4.0

3.0

2.0

7.0

6.0

5.0

Reliability

5.6

6.1* 5.0* Responsive 6.2

5.6

5.0

Desired and minimum level of service Assurance

6.0

6.3

5.3* Actual score Empathy

5.3

5.9* 4.7* Tangibles

5.7

5.5

4.4*

1.0

Reliability: ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately Responsiveness: willingness to help applicants and provide prompt service Assurance: knowledge, courtesy and ability to convey trust and confidence Empathy: caring, individualized attention provided to applicants Tangibles: appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communications materials Base: Manufacturers (Regulatory Affairs), n=18 [Q10-Q14]

18

18

Why products do not get prequalified?

19

Common deficiencies: quality

20

Common deficiencies: Safety/Efficacy – bioequivalence 21

Prequalification programme in 2011

• During 2011 35 products (finished dosage forms) prequalified • At the end of 2011, the WHO list of prequalified medicines 269 products manufactured in 25 countries • By the end of the year 8 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) (6 for antimalarials and 2 for anti-TB medicines) prequalified • 6 more medicines Quality Control Laboratories (QCL) prequalified (Belgium, Brazil, India, the Netherlands, Portugal and Tanzania). At the end of 2011, a total of 23 QCLs had been prequalified, covering all WHO 6 regions (further 32 were working towards becoming prequalified).

22

Training activities as a core

• PQP also organized, co-organized or supported 32 training courses, for nearly 1400 participants.

• Training on general or specific technical issues was given to manufacturers, and to NMRA and QCL staff. • Courses generally also include an introduction or update on PQP requirements and services.

• PQP has a 3 months rotational post for developing country assessors – many regulators from China, Ghana, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Botswana, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Ukraine etc. have been in this post – current fellow on post is from Kenya

Drug Information Association www.diahome.org

23 23

24

Technical assistance

• In 2011, PQP organized 17 technical assistance missions to 13 pharmaceutical manufacturers in 5 countries (Bangladesh, China, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan), • Technical assistance for 5 CROs in China, • Technical assistance for 2 QCLs in China, and 1 QCL each in Benin, Cameroon, Madagascar and Thailand. • Assistance took the form of an audit, followed by development of an improvement plan. Training in specific technical regulatory areas was made available where needed.

25

Technical assistances organized by PQP in individual countries

26

Quality monitoring projects

(1)

Quality survey of antimalarials Africa

– – Cooperation with NDRAs in Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania ACTs and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine – 935 samples collected and screened by Minilab, 306 tested in laboratory

ACTs SPs 70 60 50 40 % 30

32

20

44 27

10 0 Ca me ro on

0 0

Eth iop ia Gh an a

56

Ke ny a

8 0 63 67 0

Ni ge ria Ta nza nia

17

Non-compliant 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 80 PQ total 3 111 73 Non-PQ total 68 Compliant 12 12 12 7 17 AL PQ 2 1 AL non-PQ A&A co-p PQ A&A co-p non-PQ 27

Quality monitoring projects

(2)

Quality survey of anti-TB medicines in NIS

– – – Cooperation with NDRAs in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin/Isoniazid, Ofloxacin, Kanamycin 291 samples collected and tested 25 23 20 % 15 10 10 10 7 5 4 0 Ar me nia Az erb aij an Be lar us Ka zak hs tan Uk rai ne Uz be kis tan 13 •

None of 38 samples of WHO prequalified products failed 28

WHO Projects Organized in Cooperation with SFDA in China

Focus on quality and safety of medicines, sponsored by • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) – To improve TB control in China by increasing national capacity to produce fixed-dose combination (FDC) anti TB medicines of assured quality and to regulate TB FDC drugs • Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria (GFATM) – To improve the quality of anti-TB, HIV/AIDS and malaria medicine produced in China to ensure improved accessibility and patient outcome

s TBS, Nov 3, 2011 29 29

Status of RH: PQ and ERP

30

Why RH manufacturers do not apply for PQ?

And when they apply why slow progress?

       No "market" for international standard quality products, enough market for products "as it is" The need to make human and financial investments A lack of technical and regulatory skills Not yet ready to participate internationally/globally – national/subregional markets unsaturated Differences between PQP and national regulatory requirements and their implementation Varying requirements and standards of procurers Risk of losing traditional markets once defined as sub-standard – PQ programme NOCs etc.

31

What PQ can offer to the regulators and industries in the regions?

• Regulators – Capacity building/training – improved technical knowledge and skills – Practice and experience for collaboration and cooperation – Offers a lot of practical tools and guidelines – Helps to build more credible regulatory systems – Save resources • Industries – Free of charge capacity building – Better quality production/products/regulatory knowledge – better access to markets – Access to international funds

32

Conclusions

• PQP is a powerful and effective mechanism to promote access to quality medicines • PQP has saved lives • PQP is not a replacement for national regulatory systems but a (time limited) mechanism to promote access to quality medicines • Major proactive contributor to capacity building • Promotes collaboration and cooperation among regulators, including relying on each others work and reducing duplications

33

Selection of articles and publications about PQP

• •

The biowaiver procedure: its application to antituberculosis products in the WHO prequalification programme. Strauch S, Jantratid E, Stahl M, Rägo L, Dressman JB. In J Pharm Sci. 2011 Mar;100(3):822-30. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

Ensuring quality medicines: a decade of prequalification ”. In WHO Drug Information, 25(3):231 −239. Available at:

http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/druginformation/issues/DrugInformation2011_Vol25-/en/index.html

“WHO Prequalification of Medicines Programme: facts and figures for 2010.” In WHO Drug Information, 25(2):101 −103. Available at:

http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/druginformation/issues/DrugInformation2011_Vol25-2/en/index.html

“Inspection of API manufacturing sites.” In: WHO Drug Information, 25(1):24−27 and in WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter, No. 1, 2011, pp. 12 −18. Available at: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/druginformation/issues/DrugInformation2011_Vol25-1/en/index.html

http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/PharmNewsletter1_11/en/index.html

Survey of the quality of anti-tuberculosis medicines circulating in selected newly

independent states of the former Soviet Union. Available at:

http://www.who.int/prequal/info_applicants/qclabs/quality_monitoring.htm

“Best medicines. Good-quality active pharmaceutical ingredients are vital to the product of good-quality medicines.

” In: World Pharmaceutical Frontiers, September 2011. Available at: http://edition.pagesuiteprofessional.co.uk/launch.aspx?referral=other&pnum=77&refresh=5Wp1z0E20B4c&EID =daba9217-c7a4-4529-a687-a6fb6437e4c5&skip=&p=77 www.diahome.org

34