Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic Canada Indice de progrès véritable - Atlantique Measuring Population Health to Enhance Accountability NSAHO, Dartmouth, 14 November, 2003
Download ReportTranscript Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic Canada Indice de progrès véritable - Atlantique Measuring Population Health to Enhance Accountability NSAHO, Dartmouth, 14 November, 2003
Genuine Progress Index for Atlantic Canada Indice de progrès véritable - Atlantique Measuring Population Health to Enhance Accountability NSAHO, Dartmouth, 14 November, 2003 Pop. health context: Romanow and the 3 burning health policy issues 1) How to treat the sick - supply side 2) How to improve the health of Canadians = outcome measures needed to enhance accountability 3) How to check spiralling health care costs - demand side The next Royal Commission...... What kind of Nova Scotia are we leaving our children? What kind of world are we leaving our children? • Canada’s premier quality of life • More possessions, longer lives • But, defining wellbeing more broadly • Some disturbing signs Warning Signals: Determinants of Wellbeing •Higher stress rates, obesity, childhood asthma •Insecurity - safety, livelihood •Greater inequality •Decline of volunteerism •Natural resource depletion, species loss •Global warming ‘Healthy’ Economy = Healthy Communities? More equals better (vs. health as balance). Romanow = 1/3 of equation Resource depletion as economic gain Crime, sickness, pollution, make economy grow —because money is being spent. Sending the Wrong Messages GDP can grow as poverty, inequality increase. More work hours, stress make economy grow; free time has no value (Statcan. study) GDP ignores work that contributes directly to community health (volunteers, work in home). Why We Need New Indicators: Policy reasons: Economic growth = ‘better off’ sends misleading signals to policy-makers. Vital social, environmental assets ignored. Preventive initiatives to conserve and use resources sustainably, to reduce poverty, sickness and greenhouse gas emissions, are blunted and inadequately funded. Indicators are Powerful What we measure: reflects what we value as a society; determines what makes it onto the policy agenda; influences behaviour (eg students) A good set of indicators can help communities: foster common vision and purpose; identify strengths and weaknesses; change public behavior; hold leaders accountable at election time - e.g. Teen smoking as an election issue initiate actions to promote wellbeing GPI Atlantic founded to address need for better indicators • Non-profit, fully independent research group founded April, 1997 • Located Halifax. www.gpiatlantic.org • Sole mandate is to create good, usable index of wellbeing and progress • Pilot GPI projects in Glace Bay, Kings County as model for Canadian communities Measuring Wellbeing In the GPI: Health, free time, unpaid work (voluntary and household), and education have value Sickness, crime, disasters, pollution = costs Natural resources = capital assets Reductions in sickness, GHGs, crime, poverty, ecological footprint are progress Growing equity signals progress Valuing a Healthy Population GPI population health reports include: • Costs of chronic disease in Canada and NS • Women’s health in Canada + Atlantic Canada • Income, Equity and Health in Canada / Atl. Can. • Costs of tobacco, obesity, physical inactivity, HIV • Economic Impact of Smoke-Free Workplaces • Value of care-giving in two NS communities • New Atlantic region health database Chronic Disease as Cost Prevention = Investment • Costs of chronic disease are very high • Indirect costs, particularly, are huge • Large proportion of costs preventable • Disease prevention (esp. dealing with root causes) is cost-effective 5,800 Nova Scotians/yr die from 4 chronic diseases = 3/4 of all deaths in NS (cf 1900) • Cardiovascular: 2,800 36% • Cancer 30% 2,400 • COPD 370 5% • Diabetes 230+ 3%+ NS: High Rate Chronic Disease • NS - highest rate of deaths from cancer and respiratory disease • Highest rate arthritis, rheumatism • 2nd highest circulatory deaths, diabetes • 2nd highest psychiatric hospitalization + Gap with Canada is growing.... Chronic Disease Disability • 1/4 Nova Scotians have long-term activity limitation - highest in country • NS has highest use of disability days • 20% have arthritis or rheumatism • 16% have high blood pressure • 14% have chronic back problems Costs of 7 types non-infectious chronic disease, NS, 1998 • 60% medical costs = $1.2 billion / year • 76% disability costs = $900 million • 78% premature death costs = $900 mill. • 70% total burden of illness = $3 billion = $3,200 per person per yr = 13% GDP Cost of Chronic Illness in Nova Scotia 1998 (2001$ million) Circulatory Cancer Respiratory Musculoskeletal Endocrine Nervous system Mental TOTAL: Hosp. Doctor Drugs Other Total Direct Premat. Death DisTOTAL ability 161.6 71.4 21.6 55.9 18.5 55.3 104.2 26.6 11.8 3.2 20.3 7.2 27.9 17.7 63.6 7.5 16.6 22.0 29.3 19.2 39.2 137.8 49.6 22.7 53.8 30.1 56.0 88.2 389.6 140.3 64.1 152.0 85.0 158.5 249.2 326.8 427.2 43.4 3.5 43.8 30.0 16.0 244.4 14.5 78.1 307.2 27.0 158.6 72.3 960.8 582.1 185.5 462.8 155.8 347.0 337.5 488.4 114.8 197.5 438.1 1,238.8 890.8 901.9 3,031.5 These are under-estimates • Exclude diseases: Digestive, cirrhosis of liver, congenital, perinatal/LBW, blood, skin, genitourinary (chronic renal failure), etc. • “Principal diagnosis”: e.g. injury/fall vs osteoporosis; diabetes under-reported (complications: blindness, kidney failure, amputations, cardiovascular disease, infections). Diabetes 2 afflicts 4% (38,000) Nova Scotians, disables 3,300, kills 230 850 What portion is preventable? Excess risk factors account for: • 40% chronic disease incidence • 50% chronic disease premature mortality • Small number of risk factors account for 25% medical care costs = $500 mill./yr • 38% total burden of disease = $1.8 bill. (includes direct and indirect costs) A few risk factors cause many types of chronic disease • Tobacco - heart disease, cancers, respiratory disease • Obesity - hypertension, diabetes 2, heart disease, stroke, some cancers • Physical inactivity - heart disease, stroke, hypertension, colon and breast cancer, diabetes 2, osteoporosis • Diet/fat - heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes Costs of Key Risk Factors, Nova Scotia (2001 $ millions) Deaths Direct Indirect Total Tobacco 1,700 $188 $300 $488 Obesity 1,000 $120 $140 $260 700 $107 $247 $354 Physical Inactivity Socio-economic Determinants of Health • Education, income, employment, stress, social networks are key health determinants. These too are modifiable • Lifestyle interventions effective for higher income/education groups, not lower - can widen inequity, health gap Health Costs of Poverty • Most reliable predictor of poor health, premature death, disability: 4x more likely report fair or poor health = costly • e.g. Increased hospitalization: Men 15-39 = +46%; 40-64 = +57% Women 15-39 = +62%; 40-64 = +92% Heart Health Costs of Poverty • Low income groups have higher risk of smoking, obesity, physical inactivity, cardiovascular risk = costly • NS could avoid 200 deaths, $124 million/year if all Nova Scotians were as heart healthy as higher income groups …delayed child development • 31 indicators - as family income falls, children have more health problems, (NLSCY, NPHS, Statistics Canada) • Child poverty -> higher rates respiratory illness, obesity, high blood lead, iron deficiency, FAS, LBW, SIDS, delayed vocabulary development, injury+…. Highest Risk Groups • Single mothers & their children • Homeless: longer hospital stay cf low income • Unemployed, Aboriginals, migrants, minorities, disabled = Clustered disadvantages (poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, ill-health): “Social exclusion” ……health of single mothers • Worse health status than married (NPHS); higher rates chronic illness, disability days, activity restrictions • 3x health care practitioner use for mental, emotional reasons = costly • Longer-term single mothers have particularly bad health (Statcan) Prevalence of low incomewomen and men -1997 & 2000 Income: Female lone-parent families - 1997 & 2000 Trend:Low income rates of children: Single mother families ---1994-2000 Employment of Female Lone Parents 1976-2001 Low Incomes : 1991-2000 Single mothers w/out paying jobs The Economics of Single-Parenting • Single mothers with pre-school children spend 12% income on child care cf 4% in 2-parent families. In one pocket ......... • CPI for child care, restaurant good rises faster than wages • Robin Douthitt: “time poverty”. Fulltime single mothers = 75 hour week Health Cost of Inequality • British Medical Journal: “What matters in determining mortality and health is less the overall wealth of the society and more how evenly wealth is distributed. The more equally wealth is distributed, the better the health of that society.” • e.g. Sweden, Japan vs USA Costs of Inequality in NS • Excess physician use (Kephart) (Small fraction of total costs): – No high school Lower income = +49% than degree = +43% than higher – Educational inequality = $42.2 million Income inequality = $27.5 million = costs avoided if all Nova Scotians were as healthy as higher income / BA If Equality->Health, What are Trends? Average Disposable H’hold Income Ratios, 1980-98 Canada Newfoundland Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Quebec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Richest 20% : Poorest 20% 1980 1990 1998 8.2 7.1 8.5 7.6 5.8 7.3 7.4 6.2 6.7 7.1 6.2 8.5 6.7 6.1 7.0 7.6 6.9 7.9 7.8 7.1 8.3 8.8 6.7 7.6 8.1 7.3 7.4 9.1 7.4 10.4 9.3 7.6 8.0 Regional inequality = CB requires special attention • High unemployment and low-income rates, • Much higher incidence of chronic illness, disability, and premature death than Halifax • Highest age-standardized mortality rate in Maritimes • Highest death rate from circulatory disease, heart disease in Maritimes – 30% above nat.av. Of 21 Atlantic health districts, Cape Breton has highest rates of: • Cancer death (231.8 per 100,000) – 25% higher than the national average, lung cancer • Deaths due to bronchitis, emphysema, and asthma (9.2 per 100,000) –50%+ higher than the national average • High blood pressure– 21.7%, (24.3% women 19% men = 72% higher than the Canadian rate. The next highest rates are in south-southwest Nova Scotia Cape Breton = highest: • Arthritis and rheumatism: 31% of women, 23% of men • Activity limitation (34%), followed by Colchester, Cumberland, and East Hants counties (30.1%) Life expectancy: 72.8 years for men, and 79.4 for women. (Canada: 75.4 years - men and 81.2 years -women Disability-free life expectancy • Cape Bretoners have an average disability-free life expectancy of only 61.8 years, seven fewer than the national average, and the lowest of all the 139 health regions in Canada. • This means that Cape Bretoners can expect to live considerably more years with a disability than other Canadians. Potential years of life lost • highest number of potential years of life lost due to both cancer and circulatory diseases. • Cape Bretoners lose 2,261.9 potential years of life per 100,000 population due to cancer – 41% higher than the national average of 1,603.7, • and they lose 1,684 potential years of life per 100,000 population due to circulatory diseases – 65% higher than the national average of 1,020.7. Social Supports • Health Canada: “...as important as established risk factors” in contributing to health and medical outcomes, and reducing premature death, depression, mental illness, stress, chronic disability, aiding recovery from illness • Family, friends, communities, volunteers Aging - Delay vs Cure Saves $ • NS 65+: 2001 = 14%; 2036 = 28% 2011 = 16%; • 5-year delay in onset cardiovascular disease could save NS $200 million / yr • Physically active - lower lifetime illness • Nutritional intervention - reduce hospital use 25-45% among elderly “Compression of Morbidity” • Fries: “The amount of disability can decrease as morbidity is compressed into the shorter span between the increasing age at onset of disability and the fixed occurrence of death.” (= about 85: analysis of 1900s data) • “Successful aging” can preserve independence into old age Disease Prevention is Cost-Effective Investment • E.g. Workplace = 2:1 WIC = 3:1 • “Smoke-Free for Life” = 15:1 • Pre-natal counselling = 10:1 • Next Steps....A Chronic Disease Prevention Strategy for Nova Scotia - the responsibility of all sectors Can it be done?...1900s/1980s...