New York Sanitation Department Kensuke Ono Yasuyuki Kaji Agenda • The Bureau of Motor Equipment – – – – Background Performance in 1978 Discussion for improvement Action taken • Example of process.
Download ReportTranscript New York Sanitation Department Kensuke Ono Yasuyuki Kaji Agenda • The Bureau of Motor Equipment – – – – Background Performance in 1978 Discussion for improvement Action taken • Example of process.
New York Sanitation Department Kensuke Ono Yasuyuki Kaji Agenda • The Bureau of Motor Equipment – – – – Background Performance in 1978 Discussion for improvement Action taken • Example of process improvement – Kaizen – Japanese postal office case • Question The Bureau of Motor Equipment Background • • • • 1,200 employees $38 million operating budget Maintaining department’s 5,000 vehicles 75 repair garages and one central repair facility The Bureau of Motor Equipment in 1978 • Employees – Well compensated – Job secured – High level of benefits • Measurement – Work standard – “Job Sheet” : Record the actual time to do a job The Bureau of Motor Equipment in 1978 • Chaotic Productivity – Over half the vehicles are out of order – Overtime pay for labors assigned to remaining vehicles – Wasted more than $16 million • Why? – Are employees not motivated? – Is there a measurement problem? The Bureau of Motor Equipment • Need help to improve productivity! • Need ideas from the private sector!!! – Lincoln Electric – Nucor – Analogue Device Discussion • How can your policy/system help increase the productivity in the public sector? • How can your policy/system help motivate labors in the public sector? • Is there any challenge in adopting your system in the public sector? The Bureau of Motor Equipment Action taken for improvement • Improved labor/management relations • Created “profit centers” – Compared values created with outside prices • Supplied 100% of vehicle needed •Motivated employees • Productivity factor became higher than 1 More productive than private sector Kaizen(Process Improvement) Kaizen = Improvements (without spending much money, involving everyone from managers to workers, and using much common sense.) (Developed by TOYOTA motor company) Key aspects: • On-going, Never-ending process • Soft and Gradual method Kaizen • Japan has long been sensitive about waste, as the land and raw materials are scarce. • Waste can be turned into profit if it is eliminated and everybody is encouraged to participate process improvement. Kaizen Eliminate “Muda”-Wastes (non-value activities) • Overproduction and inventory, items not immediately needed • Defective products requesting repair or scraping • Motion; unnecessary movement and energy used to perform tasks • Process imposing inefficient and/or unnecessary tasks, fail to synchronize system Kaizen • Idling; by excessive set-up or equipment breakdowns • Transport, poor timing; too frequent movement of goods and deliveries Muda result in direct loss of money or at least fail to increase efficiency or productivity Kaizen • Turning loss into profit by muda elimination is one of the easiest ways for a organization to improve its operations. • Elimination of waste, does not request many efforts. # small change + small improvement = kaizen • Go to “Gemba” (real work place) first, observe, recognize muda and take steps to eliminate it. Kaizen: Japanese Postal Office • Japanese post office - 24,752 regional post offices - 260,779 employees - Mail collection, delivery - Savings and Loans - Insurance Deficit; Mail collection and delivery 580,000,000,000yen = $5,370,370,370 Kaizen: Japanese Postal Office • • • • • • • Chose 1 middle-size post office; 700 workers Invited 5 Kaizen specialists from Toyota Went to Gemba, observed and videotaped Analyzed workers’ daily activities Found 370 muda Communicated with every employee Took steps to eliminate muda (but kept quality) Kaizen: Japanese Postal Office • Reduced 20.1 percent of work time (in 6 months) • Implement Kaizen program to 1,000 other post offices this year • Estimated cost reduction 30 to 40 billion yen = $278 to $370 million a year Question • Would you like to work in the public sector? Why or why not? • How would you, as a manager, improve the productivity in the public sector?