MDG Summit Keeping the Promise Will we? And if we do, will it be good enough? Rob Vos United Nations Policy Coherence for Development Paris, 1 October.
Download ReportTranscript MDG Summit Keeping the Promise Will we? And if we do, will it be good enough? Rob Vos United Nations Policy Coherence for Development Paris, 1 October.
MDG Summit Keeping the Promise Will we? And if we do, will it be good enough? Rob Vos United Nations Policy Coherence for Development Paris, 1 October 2010 Main outcomes MDG Summit Reaffirmation of all MDG commitments and need coherence with other agendas (e.g. sustainable development, FFD) Support scaling up of successful policies: • Importance of national development strategies and ownership • Strengthened global partnerships Follow up and improved accountability through ECOSOC and DCF and strengthening of monitoring systems National policy coherence for the MDGs Summit recommendation: • Encourage all countries to design, implement and monitor national development strategies. • Pursue MDGs in holistic and comprehensive way • UN to support in design national development strategies at country request MDGs and national policy coherence World Economic and Social Survey 2010: no one size fits all, but successful experiences suggest seeking coherence in terms of: • Broad approach to macroeconomic policies, main focus on full employment • Agricultural development is key • Adequate priority to infrastructure investment • Align macroeconomic policy incentives with industrial policies • Demands of sustainable development overarching in setting priorities for agriculture and industrial policies, infrastructure and energy development • Social policy itself needs to be coherent (universal social floor as basis) No successful national strategy without enabling global environment (aid, trade, debt relief, technology transfer) ODA: Summit Recommendations Recommit to the United Nations “0.7%” aid target, implies roughly doubling of aid flows (via annual increments of $35 billion) by 2015 Deliver to priority country groups Deliver on aid effectiveness Expand development cooperation among developing countries MDG Summit recognized Gleneagles targets will not be met Expected aid shortfall in 2010 (in 2009 dollars): •$20 billion for total ODA •$16 billion for ODA to Africa Delivery against the Gleneagles target (2004 dollars) 130 126 120 Shortfall 110 108 105 103 103 100 100 92 ODA delivered 90 80 ODA required increase 80 ODA projected increase 70 Excluding debt relief to Iraq and Nigeria in 2005-2006 60 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Yet, at Summit UN Members committed to deliver 0.5% of donor GNI in ODA by 2010 ODA as percentage of GNI, 2009 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.12 1.06 1.01 0.88 0.82 UN Target of 0.7% of donor GNI by 2015 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.55 0.54 0.54 0.52 0.47 0.46 0.46 HLPM Commitment of 0.5% of GNI by 2010 0.35 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.29 0.29 0.23 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.10 Sw ed e Lu No n xe rw m ay bo D urg N enm et he ark rla n Be ds lg iu Fi m nl an U ni te Ire d d Ki lan n d Sw gd it z om er la n Fr d an ce Sp G ain er m a C ny an ad Au a st r N Aus ia ew tr Z e alia al an P d U ni ort te ug d St al at e G s re ec Ja e pa Ko n re a, It a Re ly D p. o AC f to ta l 0.0 HLPM reconfirms target of Aid to LDCs Delivery of ODA to LDCs against the Brussels target Luxembourg Norw ay Denmark Sw eden Ireland Netherlands Belgium United Finland Canada Sw itzerland France Germany Portugal Spain New Zealand Australia Italy Austria United States Japan Greece Korea, Rep. of DAC total 0.00 2000 0.05 0.05 2008 0.09 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Making aid more effective Some progress in: ● Alignment of technical assistance with country programmes ● Untying of aid ● Strengthening of public financial management systems Less progress in: ● Donor use of recipient country systems ● Predictability of aid flows ● Reducing transaction costs of providing aid MDG Summit Outcome: Strong commitment to more budget support and less policy conditionality Role of DCF in strengthening mutual accountability Aid effectiveness and MDG summit Some unresolved issues of incoherence: • More earmarking of aid and more vertical funding versus need for more budget support • Additionality of aid for food security and climate (if not additional, the issue will be adequacy) • Role of innovative sources of financing in reforming the aid architecture • Alignment with other sources of financing • Role of aid in global rebalancing (“net transfer problem”) TRADE: key MDG Summit recommendations Intensify efforts to conclude a development-oriented Doha Round Accelerate full implementation of DFQF market access Eliminate agricultural (export) subsidies (and all measures with equivalent effect) by end 2013 Strengthen Aid for Trade Large gap remains in providing duty free access Proportion of developed-country imports from developing countries and LDCs admitted free of duty (percentage) 100 DFQF Target 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 2000 2001 2002 2003 Developing countries, excl. arms and oil Developing countries, excl. arms 2004 2005 2006 2007 LDCs, excl. arms and oil LDCs, excl. arms 2008 Agricultural subsidies in developed countries remain high Total agricultural support in OECD countries 1990 2000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Billions of US dollars Billions of euros As a percentage of OECD countries’ GDP 327 323 383 375 363 364 376 257 351 308 302 289 266 257 2.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 Aid for trade increased 35 percent, reaching a record level of $42 billion Aid for Trade Commitments (2008 dollars) 45 40 Trade-related adjustment 40 35 37 Trade policy and regulations 34 Building productive capacity 30 25 20 31 Economic infrastructure 15 10 28 5 0 25 2002-2005 2006 2007 2008 Percentage of total sectorallocable aid Some key coherence issues in TRADE “Aid for trade” versus NDS’s and budget support Address inequities in “Aid for Trade” Ensure DFQF market access is a “win” situation for beneficiary countries Ensure Doha Round aligning of preference schemes is a “win” for all LDCs Broader issues: see WESS 2010 DEBT SUSTAINABILITY: key MDG Summit recommendations Offer option of moratoria to countries affected by emergency situations Provide ODA in grant form to low-income countries Set up schemes of independent arbitration or mediation, or organizing ad hoc meetings of a debtor with its creditors Extend and re-open eligibility to participate in the HIPC Initiative Convene a multi-stakeholder expert group on sovereign debt workout mechanism Countries in debt distress or at high risk of distress 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 HIPCs Other low income Lower-middle income Upper-middle income Some key coherence issues in DEBT Financing of MDG strategies and debt sustainability Additionality of debt relief to ODA commitments Sovereign debt workout mechanism with financial safety nets, compensatory financing, and new financial regulation Can the promise be kept? No major new commitments Commitments for global partnerships no tall order economically speaking; political will needs to be shown in actions Taller order is moving towards sustainable rebalancing of global economy