The Progression of Technology Education in the U.S.A. Pacific Rim International Conference on Technology Education Technology Education Institute of Nanjing Normal University October 16-18, 2013 William.
Download ReportTranscript The Progression of Technology Education in the U.S.A. Pacific Rim International Conference on Technology Education Technology Education Institute of Nanjing Normal University October 16-18, 2013 William.
The Progression of Technology Education in the U.S.A. Pacific Rim International Conference on Technology Education Technology Education Institute of Nanjing Normal University October 16-18, 2013 William E. Dugger, Jr. Senior Fellow, International Technology and Engineering Educators Association Emeritus Professor of Technology Education, Virginia Tech 1 The Progression of Technology Over Time • The First Technologies … – A Flaked-stone (Olduvai) technology (Africa, 2-3 million years ago). – Cheulean-style Implements or tools (1.5 million years ago). – Evidence exists that by about 2 million years ago our ancestors had become right- (or left-) handed 2 The Progression of Technology Over Time (Continued) • With the passage of time, humans have invented and innovated many forms of technology (below are just a few): – Creation and manipulation of fire – The “ages” of technology (Stone age, Copper and Bronze Ages, Iron Age) – The wheel – The abacus – The clock – The crossbow – The compass – Gunpowder – Papermaking – Printing 3 The Progression of Technology Over Time (Continued) • • • • • 4 Refinement of Agriculture Renaissance Technologies Age of Exploration Industrial Revolution 20th and 21st Century Technologies What is Technology? “Technology is the innovation, change, or modification of the natural world or environment to satisfy perceived human wants and needs.” (Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology, ITEA/ITEEA: 2000/2002/2007). TECHNOLOGY is human innovation in action (Reminder: technology is our content—what we teach—while technology education is the school subject that teaches about technology—to whom, where, when, why, and how). 5 Needs and Wants • A human need, or the OBJECT of a human need, is something people must have in order to live a good life. • A want, or the OBJECT of a want, is something one desires to have, whether or not one needs it. 6 Basic Human Technological Needs and Wants • • • • • • • • 7 Health and Safety Food and Fiber Energy Communication Information Mobility Products Shelter and Comfort Science vs. • Deals with the natural world. • Very concerned with what is (exists) in the natural world. (i.e.,: biology, chemistry, physics, astronomy, geology, etc.) 8 Technology • Deals with how humans modify, change, alter, or control the natural world. • Very concerned with what can or should be designed, made, or developed from natural world materials and substances to satisfy human needs and wants. 8 Science vs. Technology Continued • Concerned with inquiries that seek out the meaning of the natural world by “inquiry,” “discovering what is,” “exploring,” and using “the Scientific Method.” 9 • Concerned with processes we use to alter/change the natural world such as “invention,” “innovation,” practical problem solving, and design. In the U.S., education is primarily the responsibility of the states or local government. The U.S. Department of Education has limited power and responsibility concerning education at the state or local level. 10 Important Events in the Progression of Technology Education in the U.S. • The study of technology began in the United States (U. S.) in the last half of the 1800’s as “Manual Arts”. • It had its philosophical foundation primarily from the “Educational Sloyd” system in Finland (Cygnaeus) and in Sweden (Salomon). • Charles Richards created the term “industrial arts” in 1904. • Another important factor in the U. S. was the passage of the Morrill Act in 1862 that established institutions in each state that would educate people in agriculture, home economics, mechanical arts, and other professions. 11 Continuation of Important Events • 1923 – Bonser and Mossman, in Industrial Arts in the Elementary School, defined industrial arts as a study of the changes made by man in the forms of materials to increase their values, and of the problems of life related to these changes (Bonser & Mossman, 1923, p. 5). 12 American Industrial Arts Association (AIAA) • 1939 – AIAA was founded by William E. Warner, Professor of Industrial Arts Education at The Ohio State University • AIAA held its first conference in 1947 in Columbus, Ohio. The theme of the conference was “A Curriculum to Reflect Technology” 13 Federal- and State-Funded Curriculum Projects in Industrial Arts (1960s and 1970s) • Industrial Arts Curriculum Project (IACP) (1965 to 1970s, The Ohio State University) • American Industry Project (1966 – Stout State University) • The Maryland Plan (1970s into 1990s) (Directed by Donald Maley at the University of Maryland). 14 Transition of Content • In the 1970s and 1980s, the U.S. Industrial Arts profession slowly moved away from teaching individual skills of industry (woodworking, metalworking, electricity, engineering, and architectural drawing). 15 • In the late 1980s and 1990s, Industrial Arts moved towards larger clusters of technological content (manufacturing, construction, energy and power, transportation, and communication). • Today, the study of technology in the U.S. is an elective area in most states and localities with about 150,000 students and 28,000 teachers. Standards for Industrial Arts Programs Project The Standards for Industrial Arts Programs was published in 1981 and revised in 1985 and retitled Standards for Technology Education. 16 Jackson’s Mill Industrial Arts Curriculum Theory • 1981 – James A. Hales and James F. Snyder • Discusses various elements that must be considered in the development of industrial arts curriculum: society and culture, human adaptive systems, the universal systems model, system processes, the role of schooling, and curriculum theory. 17 AIAA changes to ITEA • 1985 – The American Industrial Arts Association (AIAA) members voted to change the name to the International Technology Education Association (ITEA). ➤ 18 Nationally Developed Standards Movement Began in the 1980s • “A standard is a written statement that specifies the knowledge (what students should know) and the process (what students should be able to do) in order to be literate” (ITEEA, 2000, 2002, 2007). • Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, (NCTM, 1989) • Benchmarks for Science Literacy, (AAAS, 1993). • National Science Education Standards, (NRC, 1996). • Standards for Technological Literacy, (ITEA, 2000). • Also, about a dozen other standards were nationally developed in the 1990s. 19 Technology for All Americans Project (1994-2005) 1. Funded to ITEA by The National Science Foundation (NSF) and The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 2. A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology (R&S) (ITEA, 1994-1996) (Revised in 2006 as a CD). 3. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (STL) (ITEA, 1996-2000) (Revised and reprinted in 2002 and 2007). 4. Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards (AETL) (ITEA, 2000-2005). 20 Additional TFAAP Research Activities in 2000-05 • The Status of Technology and Engineering Education in the U. S. (ITEA/ITEEA, 2001, 2004, 2007, 2011) • ITEA/Gallup Polls (2001 & 2004) • Addenda • Briefings • ITEA’s curriculum development effort is in the Engineering byDesign (EbD) Center. All K-12 publications are standards based (STL, science, mathematics, and common core standards). Find this information, and more, in ITEEA’s online Press Room http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/pressroom.htm 21 STL Facts • Used in 41 U.S. states (ITEEA, Status Study,2007.) • STL has been translated into Chinese, Japanese, Finnish, German, and Estonian. AETL has been translated into Japanese. • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) created a Technology and Engineering Assessment (starting in 2014) using STL as their framework. • In 2012, the State of Palestine adopted STL as the content organizer for its mandatory curriculum in Grades 5-10. • STL cites “engineering” 150+ times, “science” 60+ times, and “mathematics” 50+ times. 22 Standards Evolution in the U.S. • Standards are dynamic and need periodic revision. • Other major standards that have been revised or created: • Mathematics: NCTM - 1989 ➤ 2000. • Common Core Standards for Mathematics: Council of Chief State School Officers & National Governors Association, 2011. • Next Generation Science Standards: NRC – 2013. (This includes Engineering Design, Technology, and the Applications of Science as one of the four domains). • Technology: STL – In use now but needs revision. • Engineering - No Standards. • STEM - No Standards. 23 What is Engineering byDesign™? 24 Engineering byDesign™ (EbD™) Program 25 There is a growing movement in some countries to teach the integrative subjects of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). 26 What is STEM Education? STEM is the integration of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics into a new trans-disciplinary subject in schools. 27 STEM Education offers a chance for students to make sense of the world rather than learn isolated bits and pieces of phenomena. 28 Integration vs. Isolation S–T–E–M STEM STEM STEM 29 = Four subjects (“silos”) taught separately = 1 subject integrated with others = 2 subjects out of 4 integrated = Full Integration of 4 subjects ITEA Changes to ITEEA In 2011, the members of the International Technology Education Association (ITEA) voted to change the name to the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA). ➤ 30 31 A copy of this presentation can be downloaded here: http://www.iteea.org/Resources/ PressRoom/ictechinakeynote2013.ppt 32 33 Thank You! William E. Dugger, Jr. Senior Fellow and Former Director Technology for All Americans Project International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [email protected] & Emeritus Professor of Technology Education Virginia Tech [email protected]