Transcript MS Department of Education MDE/MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2011 July 18-22, 2011  Jackson Convention Complex Office of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Presenters: Mike Mulvihill and.

MS Department of Education
MDE/MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2011
July 18-22, 2011  Jackson Convention Complex
Office of Career and Technical
Education (CTE)
Presenters:
Mike Mulvihill and Sandra Crowley
1
Discussion of Federal Reporting
for Vocational Education
 Perkins IV Accountability:
Acronyms and Definitions
 Program Performance: Perkins
IV Core Indicators
 Sample Performance Measures
 Student/Teacher Schedule Match
2
Perkins IV Accountability:
Acronyms and Definitions
 CAR – Consolidated Annual Report
 STATE Performance Levels - Final Agreed
Upon Performance Levels (FAUPL)
 LOCAL Performance Levels - Individual
Program Performance Levels (IPPL)
 Concentrators – Students who completed
Year 1 of a 2-year program and enrolled in
Year 2.
 Participants – Students enrolled in a
vocational program.
3
Perkins IV Accountability:
Acronyms and Definitions
Racial Ethnicity (7 permitted values)







American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic/Latino
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White
Two or more races
4
Perkins IV Accountability:
Acronyms and Definitions
Vocational Student Indicators







Limited English Proficient
Disabled
Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Single Parent
Displaced Homemakers
Nontraditional
5
Perkins IV Accountability:
Acronyms and Definitions
Placement of Vocational Students






Continued Education
Military
Employment Field Trained
Employment Field Not Trained
Not Employed
Other
6
Secondary Perkins IV Core Indicators
1S1 - Academic Attainment – Reading &
Language Arts
1S2 - Academic Attainment – Mathematics
2S1 - Technical Skills Attainment – MS CPAS
3S1 - Secondary School Completion
4S1 - Student Graduation Rates
7
Secondary Perkins IV Core Indicators
5S1 - Secondary Placement
6S1 - Nontraditional Participation
6S2 - Nontraditional Completion
8
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator and
Citation
1S1
Academic
Attainment–
Reading/Lang
uage Arts
113(b)(2)(A)(i)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of concentrators
who completed both years of a 2-year L: 80.00%
program who have met the proficient or
advanced level on the statewide high A:
school reading/language arts assessment
administered by the state under Section
1111(b)(3) of the ESEA
Denominator: Number of concentrators
who completed both years of a 2-year
program who took the ESEA assessments
in reading/language arts and who have
left secondary education in the reporting
year
9
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
1S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 13
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program who have met the proficient or advanced level on
the statewide high school reading/language arts assessment
administered by the state under Section 1111(b)(3) of the
ESEA.
1S1 DENOMINATOR:
The program had 16
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program who took the ESEA assessments in
reading/language arts and have left secondary education in
the reporting year.
10
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 1S1 - IPPL)
1S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 1S1 Numerator
divided by the 1S1 Denominator multiplied by 100
1S1 IPPL% = 13 / 16 X 100 = 81.00%
81.00% is greater than the 1S1 FAUPL required
value of 80.00%
The program exceeded the required core indicator
value.
11
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1S2 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator and
Citation
1S2
Academic
Attainment–
Mathematics
113(b)(2)(A)(i)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of concentrators
who completed both years of a 2-year L: 91.00%
program who have met the proficient or
advanced level on the statewide high A:
school
mathematics
assessment
administered by the state under Section
1111(b)(3) of the ESEA
Denominator: Number of concentrators
who completed both years of a 2-year
program who took the ESEA assessments
in mathematics and who have left
secondary education in the reporting year
12
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1S2 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
1S2 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 15
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program who have met the proficient or advanced level on
the statewide high school mathematics assessment
administered by the state under Section 1111(b) (3) of the
ESEA.
1S2 DENOMINATOR:
The program had 16
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program who took the ESEA assessments in mathematics
and who have left secondary education in the reporting year.
13
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 1S2 - IPPL)
1S2 IPPL in percent (%) = The 1S2 Numerator
divided by the 1S2 Denominator multiplied by 100
1S2 (%) = 15 / 16 X 100 = 94.00%
94.00% is greater than the 1S2 FAUPL required
value of 91.00%
The program exceeded the required core indicator
value.
14
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
2S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator
and Citation
2S1
Technical
Skill
Attainment
113(b)(2)(A
)(ii)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of concentrators
who passed technical–skill
L: 63.00%
assessments that are aligned with
A:
industry-recognized standards, if
available and appropriate, during the
reporting year
Denominator: Number of
concentrators who took technical–
skill assessments during the reporting
year
15
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
2S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
2S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 11
concentrators who passed technical–skill assessments
(CPAS) that are aligned with industry-recognized standards,
if available and appropriate, during the reporting year.
2S1 DENOMINATOR:
The program had 16
concentrators who took technical– skill assessments
during the reporting year.
16
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 2S1 - IPPL)
2S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 2S1 Numerator
divided by the 2S1 Denominator multiplied by 100
2S1 (%) = 11 / 16 X 100 = 68.75%
68.75% is greater than the 2S1 FAUPL required
value of 63.00%
The program exceeded the required core indicator
value.
17
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
3S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator
and Citation
3S1
Secondary
School
Completion
113(b)(2)(A
)(iii)(I-III)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of concentrators
who completed both years of a 2-year L: 64.7%
program reported as graduated using
A:
your state’s approved calculation for
graduation rate as defined in your
state’s ESEA accountability workbook
Denominator:
Number
of
concentrators who completed both
years of a 2-year program who have
left secondary education in the
reporting year
18
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
3S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
3S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 11
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program reported as graduated using the state’s approved
calculation for graduation rate as defined in the state’s ESEA
accountability workbook.
3S1 DENOMINATOR:
The program had 16
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program and left secondary education in the reporting year.
19
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 3S1 - IPPL)
3S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 3S1 Numerator
divided by the 3S1 Denominator multiplied by 100
3S1 (%) = 11 / 16 X 100 = 68.75%
68.75% is greater than the 3S1 FAUPL required
value of 64.7%
The program exceeded the required core indicator
value.
20
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
4S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator
and Citation
4S1
Student
Graduation
Rates
113(b)(2)(A
)(iv)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of concentrators
who completed both years of a 2-year L: 64.7%
program reported as graduated using
A:
your state’s approved calculation for
graduation rate as defined in your
state’s ESEA accountability workbook
Denominator:
Number
of
concentrators who completed both
years of a 2-year program who have
left secondary education in the
reporting year
21
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
4S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
4S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 11
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program reported as graduated using the state’s approved
calculation for graduation rate as defined in the state’s ESEA
accountability workbook.
4S1 DENOMINATOR:
The program had 16
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program and left secondary education in the reporting year.
22
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 4S1 - IPPL)
4S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 4S1 Numerator
divided by the 4S1 Denominator multiplied by 100
4S1 (%) = 11 / 16 X 100 = 68.75%
68.75% is greater than the 4S1 FAUPL required
value of 64.7%
The program exceeded the required core indicator
value.
23
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
5S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator
and Citation
5S1
Secondary
Placement
113(b)(2)(A
)(v)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of students
placed in military, advanced education, L: 90.2%
or employment
A:
Denominator: Number of
concentrators who completed both
years of a 2-year program who have
left secondary education in the
reporting year
24
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
5S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
5S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 14
students placed in military, advanced education, or
employment
5S1 DENOMINATOR:
The program had 16
concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year
program who have left secondary education in the reporting
year.
25
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 5S1 - IPPL)
5S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 5S1 Numerator
divided by the 5S1 Denominator multiplied by 100
5S1 (%) = 14 / 16 X 100 = 87.50%
87.50% is less than the 5S1 FAUPL required value
of 90.2%
The program did not meet the required core
indicator value.
26
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
6S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator and
Citation
6S1
Nontradition
al
Participation
113(b)(2)(A)(
vi)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Nontraditional Participation
Numerator: Number of CTE L: 16.6%
participants from underrepresented
A:
gender groups who participated in a
program that leads to employment in
nontraditional fields during the
reporting year
Denominator: Number of CTE
participants who participated in a
program that leads to employment in
nontraditional fields during the
reporting year
27
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
6S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
6S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 6
(females) CTE participants from underrepresented gender
groups who participated in a program that leads to
employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting
year.
6S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had a total of 48
CTE participants who participated in the program that
leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the
reporting year.
28
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 6S1 - IPPL)
6S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 6S1 Numerator
divided by the 6S1 Denominator multiplied by 100
6S1 (%) = 6/ 48 X 100 = 12.50%
12.50% is less than the 6S1 FAUPL required value
of 16.6%
The program did not meet the required core
indicator value.
29
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
6S2 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column
1
Indicator and
Citation
6S2
Nontradition
al
Completion
113(b)(3)(B)(
vi)
Column
2
Measurement
Definition
Column
6
Year Two*
7/1/08–6/30/09
Numerator: Number of CTE
concentrators from underrepresented L: 14.6%
gender groups who completed a
A:
program that leads to employment in
nontraditional fields during the
reporting year
Denominator: Number of CTE
participants who participated in a
program that leads to employment in
nontraditional fields during the
reporting year
30
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
6S2 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
6S2 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 5
CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups
who completed a program that leads to employment in
nontraditional fields during the reporting year.
6S2 DENOMINATOR: The program had a total of 48
CTE participants who participated in a program that leads
to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting
year.
31
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(Actual Calculation for 6S2 - IPPL)
6S2 IPPL in percent (%) = The 6S2 Numerator
divided by the 6S2 Denominator multiplied by 100
6S2 (%) = 5/ 48 X 100 = 10.42%
10.42% is less than the 6S2 FAUPL required value
of 14.6%
The program did not meet the required core
indicator value.
32
SAMPLE CAR for Mississippi
Core Indicator
L = State-adjusted performance level
A = State-actual performance
1S1
Secondary Academic Attainment–Reading
1S2
Secondary Academic Attainment –Mathematics
2S1
Technical Skill Attainment
3S1
Secondary School Completion
4S1
Graduation Rates
5S1
Secondary Placement
6S1
Nontraditional Participation
6S2
Nontraditional Completion
7/1/096/30/10
L: 51.00%
A: 82.45%
L: 59.00%
A: 62.05%
L: 66.00%
A: 55.54%
L: 67.00%
A: 50.44%
L: 67.00%
A: 50.44%
L: 90.20%
A: 85.81%
L: 16.70%
A: 19.71%
L: 14.70%
A: 18.66%
33
SAMPLE DISTRICT SUMMARY REPORT
NOTE: Programs must meet or exceed seven of the nine Core Indicators, with four
34
of them mandatory—Reading/LA, Mathematics, Occ. Skills, and Graduation.
MATCHING STUDENT SCHEDULE
TO TEACHER SCHEDULE
If these schedules do not match, student roster
data will not populate for those students. 35
Contact Information:
Mike Mulvihill, Bureau Director
Office of Career and Technical Education
Telephone: (601) 359-3088
Fax: (601) 359-6619
Email: [email protected]
Sandra Crowley
Division Director
Telephone: (601) 359-3974
Fax: (601) 359-6619
Email: [email protected]
36