Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2015 www.aodhealth.org Featured Article Specialty substance use disorder services following brief alcohol intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled.
Download
Report
Transcript Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2015 www.aodhealth.org Featured Article Specialty substance use disorder services following brief alcohol intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled.
Journal Club
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
July–August 2015
www.aodhealth.org
1
Featured Article
Specialty substance use
disorder services following
brief alcohol intervention: a
meta-analysis of
randomized controlled trials
Glass JE, et al. Addiction. 2015;110(9):1404–1415.
Study Objective
• To determine whether the “referral to
treatment” component of alcohol
screening, brief intervention, and
referral to treatment (SBIRT) is leading
to treatment.
www.aodhealth.org
3
Study Design
• Systematic review and meta-analysis.
• Studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of
brief alcohol interventions in general health care
settings among adults and adolescents.
www.aodhealth.org
4
Assessing an Overview Article
(Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)
• Are the results of the study valid?
• What are the results?
• Will the results help me in caring for
my patients?
www.aodhealth.org
5
Are the Results of the Study Valid?
• Did the overview address a focused clinical question?
• Were the criteria used to select articles for inclusion
appropriate?
• Is it unlikely that important, relevant studies were missed?
• Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
• Were assessments of studies reproducible?
• Were the results similar from study to study?
www.aodhealth.org
6
Did the overview address a
focused clinical question?
• Yes.
• Main outcomes:
– Post-intervention alcohol services utilization determined via selfreport or administrative data.
www.aodhealth.org
7
Were the criteria used to select
articles for inclusion appropriate?
• Yes.
• 13 randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria;
9 were included in the meta-analysis.
– Articles were published in English up until 2013 and available
in electronic databases.
– Studies had to have had an alcohol intervention in a general
healthcare setting.
– Participants must not have been seeking treatment.
– Studies were excluded if they did not include health services
utilization data.
www.aodhealth.org
8
Is it unlikely that important,
relevant studies were missed?
Yes.
The authors searched PubMed, the Cochrane
Library, PsycINFO, and CINAHL Plus through 26
July, 2013.
They also did a hand search of peer-reviewed and
grey papers by the references in the included
articles and contacted authors to ask if they knew
of other existing studies.
www.aodhealth.org
9
Was the validity of the included
studies appraised?
• Yes.
– Two authors independently reviewed the
articles and performed the data extraction.
www.aodhealth.org
10
Were assessments of studies
reproducible?
• Yes.
• The authors state their specific criteria for
grouping of studies and classifying
intervention intensity and severity of alcohol
use.
• Two authors independently reviewed papers.
• Data extraction used standardized forms
• Meetings were held to identify and resolve
discrepancies.
www.aodhealth.org
11
Were the results similar from
study to study?
• Yes.
• The I2 statistic for the 9 studies included in
the meta-analysis was 0%, indicating no
evidence of study heterogeneity
www.aodhealth.org
12
What Are the Results?
What are the overall results of the
review?
How precise were the results?
www.aodhealth.org
13
What are the overall results of
the review?
• Referral to alcohol treatment did not lead to
treatment following alcohol SBIRT.
• Subgroup analyses yielded non-statistically
significant results.
www.aodhealth.org
14
How precise were the results?
• For the primary outcome of receipt of alcohol
treatment following SBIRT, the pooled risk ratio
was = 1.08, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-1.28.
www.aodhealth.org
15
Will the Results Help Me in
Caring for My Patients?
• Can the results be applied to my patient
care?
• Were all clinically important outcomes
considered?
www.aodhealth.org
16
Can the results be applied to my
patient care?
• Yes.
– Study participants were non-treatment seeking
adults and adolescents in general healthcare
settings in 5 countries.
www.aodhealth.org
17
Were all clinically important
outcomes considered?
• Yes.
www.aodhealth.org
18