Anisotropic Plasma Astrophysics Roger Blandford Paul Simeon Yajie Yuan KIPAC Stanford 27 i 2012 AronsFest Describing Cosmic Plasma • Fluid description – P, , v, B… – Magneto Fluid Dynamics • Flux-freezing,

Download Report

Transcript Anisotropic Plasma Astrophysics Roger Blandford Paul Simeon Yajie Yuan KIPAC Stanford 27 i 2012 AronsFest Describing Cosmic Plasma • Fluid description – P, , v, B… – Magneto Fluid Dynamics • Flux-freezing,

Anisotropic
Plasma Astrophysics
Roger Blandford
Paul Simeon
Yajie Yuan
KIPAC
Stanford
27 i 2012
AronsFest
1
Describing Cosmic Plasma
• Fluid description
– P, , v, B…
– Magneto Fluid Dynamics
• Flux-freezing, conservation of mass, momentum, energy
• P ~ isotropic!
– Relativistic flows
– Electromagnetic Flows
• Kinetic description
Need a hybrid approach
to tackle contemporary problem
– f(p,x,t), E, B…
– Collisionless plasmas
• Vlasov equation for f
– Nonthermal distributions
– Transport effects
– Ultrarelativistic plasmas
27 i 2012
AronsFest
2
Anisotropic MHD
• MHD commonly developed and computed assuming
isotropic pressure
• Collisionless plasmas are observed and expected to be
anisotropic
• How and when can we discuss this at the fluid level using
a pressure tensor?
• Interesting and possibly different when dominant
pressure (and current) is due to ultrarelativistic particles
while the flow is locally non-relativistic
• Dissipation due to radiation not collisions or plasma
instabilities
• Diffusive Shock Acceleration – SNR, clusters…
– Pinches - PWN, jets…
27 i 2012
AronsFest
3
Particle Acceleration
Unipolar
Induction
Stochastic
Acceleration

U
V ~ 
I ~ V / Z0
Z0~100
P ~ V I ~ V2/Z0
c

27 i 2012
DE/E ~ +/-u/c
ln(E) ~ u/c (Rt)1/2
AronsFest
4
Cosmic Rays
protons
heavies?
protons??
27 i 2012
GeV
Cahill Dedication, Caltech
TeV
PeV
AronsFest
EeV
ZeV
5
Cosmic Rays
solar
system
supernova remnants
pulsars?
active
galactic
nuclei ??
27 i 2012
GeV
Cahill Dedication, Caltech
TeV
PeV
AronsFest
EeV
ZeV
6
Supernova remnants
SN1006 X-ray
Cassiopeia A
X-ray
SN1006
Cas A
Radio
Tycho
Cosmic rays
Crab Nebula
W44
.
27 i 2012
Chandra
AronsFest
7
Particle acceleration in SNR
• ~ 100TeV gamma rays
SN1006
– ~0.3 PeV cosmic rays
– Hadronic and leptonic (Fermi)
• Variable X-rays
– 100 TeV electrons
– ~ 1 mG magnetic field
Tycho
Cas A
• Shocks also amplify
magnetic field
– Details controversial
Perseus
Cluster
27 i 2012
AronsFest
8
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
• Zevatrons?
– Top down exotica
• GZK cutoff
• EM channel not seen and hard to avoid
– Massive BH in AGN (~30-50 Mpc)
• AGN may be too weak
• Acceleration must be remote from BH
– Gamma-Ray Bursts
• Stellar BH or millisecond magnetar?
• Too distant? Too much radiation?
– Cluster Shocks (Norman,Ryu,Bohringer…)
•
•
•
•
•
•
High Mach accretion shocks
Hard to accelerate p to ZeV energy
Heavy elements may be predicted
e.g. Fe; range ~ 10 Mpc?
Composition controversial
Analysis should be aided by LHC
27 i 2012
AronsFest
9
Entropy Matters
• Sgas=1.5 ln[(T/Trec)(n/nrec)-2/3]k (relative to recombination)
– Much more in CMB
• Shocks create gas entropy
 DS[M]=1.5ln[(5M2/4-1/4)(1/4+3/4M2)5/3]k
• Before reionization
– Weak shocks M ~ 1-3
 DS < k
• During reionization (z~10)
– Ionization entropy
– Moderate shocks M ~1-20
 DS <3k
• After reionization
– May need DS as large as 10k
– Would imply M~100
• e.g. V~1000, s~10 km s-1
M
Simionescu et al
Perseus
Sgas/k
18
r
17
16
15
14
13
27 istrong
2012
AronsFest
10
Recent
evidence for presence of
high M accretion shocks around clusters
Shocks in Structure Formation Simulations (Ryu et al 2003)
Lx
pancake
gas
filament
cluster
(100 Mpc/h)2 2D slice
T
Ms
Simulations exhibit high M shocks
LCDM simulation with 10243 cells, computational box: (100h-1
3 , TVD: grid-based Eulerian
27 i 2012
AronsFesthydro code
11
Mpc)
GeV -rays from
Clusters of Galaxies
Keith Bechtol
•Active Galactic Nuclei
•Primordial cosmic rays
•Dark Matter Annihilation
Han et al 2012
27 i 2012
Upper limits are interesting!
AronsFest
12
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
UHECR at accretion shocks??
Accretion shocks
Norman
Invisible
Ryu
v~500-1000 km/s?
Bohringer…
R ~ 3-10Mpc
B ~ 3 x 1020V/v R ~10mG!
However, SNR generate phenomenal fields
OK if UHECR is Fe
Counter-evolutionary tendency
27 i 2012
AronsFest
13

Collisionless Shocks
Scatter off magnetic waves
f  ( p)  qp
q

p
0
dp' p'q1 f  ( p');q  3r /(r 1)
Explain intensity and spectrum of Galactic cosmic rays
27 i 2012
AronsFest
14
Too good to be true!
• Diffusion: CR create their own magnetic irregularities ahead of
shock through instability if <v>>a
– Instability likely to become nonlinear - Bohm limit
– What happens in practice?
– Parallel vs perpendicular diffusion?
• Cosmic rays are not test particles
– Include in Rankine-Hugoniot conditions
– u=u(x)
– Include magnetic stress too?
• Acceleration controlled by injection
– Cosmic rays are part of the shock
• What happens when v ~ u?
– Relativistic shocks
• Energy cutoff?
– E < euBR ~ PeV for mG magnetic field
27 i 2012
AronsFest
15
Particle Transport
• Alfven waves scatter cosmic rays
  ~ (B/B)2rL
• Bohm?
Cosmic Ray Pressure dominates
Magnetic and Gas Pressure
far ahead of Shock
– D ~ c/3
• Parallel vs perpendicular
– L ~ D/u > 100rL ~ 100 EPeVBmG-1Z-1pc
• RSNR < 10pc
– Highest energy cosmic rays stream furthest ahead of shock
• L~E?
– “Magnetic Bootstrap”
• Firehose and other instabilities
P(E) /
GeV
27 i 2012
0.1 P(E) / u2
u2
TeV
AronsFest
E
PeV PeV
TeV
X
GeV Shock
16
Magnetic Bootstrap
RB Funk 2007
• Assume:
–
–
–
–
Cosmic rays accelerated by DSA at shock front to ~PeV energy
PCR ~ 0.1u2 E9-0.2
Magnetic field amplified upstream  > rL
Dynamical effects on background small
• Wave turbulence maintained at Bohm level mainly
by Firehose modes
– Also mirror, gyroresonant, Bell-Lucek
– Transport by field line modeling
– “Uniform” field is turbulent field created by higher energy upstream
• Cosmic rays with energy ~ Emax stream away
from the shock
– Firehose dominates if u > (aISM c)1/2 (PCR/u2)-1/4 ~1000 km s-1
• Fermi observations are instructive!
27 i 2012
AronsFest
17
Magnetic Bootlaces
th
• How can a small magnetic
pressure mediate the
interaction between two
particle “fluids”?
PP  j P B
PCR  jCR B
dB
 j P  jCR
dX
27 i 2012
CR
P
mag
X
j
X
AronsFest
18
Extragalactic Jets
M87
Cygnus A
PictorA
3C273
3C31
Pictor A
NGC 326
3C75
27 i 2012
AronsFest
19
McKinney
Tschekhoskoy
RB
2012
27 i 2012
AronsFest
20
Crab Nebula
27 i 2012
AronsFest
21
Flaring behavior
Buehler et al
April 2011
Power~1029W
Singular events or power spectrum?
27 i 2012
AronsFest
No variation seen in other bands
22
Spectrum of “Flare”
synchrotron spectrum
27 i 2012
AronsFest
Electron synchrotron radiation: E~PeV,
~109;
B~100nT
23
Where does the variation originate ?
• Long term variation of nebula likely
due to changes in magnetic field
• Peak power is ~ 3 percent of nebular
power
• Flare energy equals that stared in a
region of size
L~ 20B-71/2 lt d ~ 2B-71/2 arcsec
• We want to learn where and how
nature accelerates particles to high
energy
• Not the Pulsar
=10,000mas
W
J
P
S
T
– No correlation with rotation frequency
• Wind shocks when momentum flux
equals nebular pressure
• Wind, Shock, Jet, Torus are all
possibilities
27 i 2012
AronsFest
1 lt hr = 3 mas
Larmor radius= 609B-7-1mas
24
Pinch?
• Resistance in line current
– Current carried by high energy
particles
– Resistance due to radiation reaction
– Pairs undergo poloidal gyrations
which radiate in all directions
– Relativistic drift along direction of
current Jet!!
– Compose current from orbits selfconsistently
– Illustration of Poynting’s theorem!
– Variation intrinsic due to instability
E
j X
Bf
r
E  j   N
1
jz 
 E
cm 0
 j 
27 i 2012
AronsFest
Prr dB Pff

B 2 d B
25

MHD with Pressure Tensor
Linear Perturbations
etc
Double Adiabatic Ansatz (CGL)
etc
First invariant has validity but second is questionable in real plasmas
(Kulsrud…). However something like this may be a reasonable
approximation for some problems including those of current interest
27 i 2012
AronsFest
26
Friedrich Diagrams Vf(q)
27 i 2012
AronsFest
27
Firehose (and mirror) instabilities
27 i 2012
AronsFest
28
Conjectures
• Relativistic CR ahead of nonrelativistic shock
wave behave like a highly anisotropic fluid with
an equation of state and this dictates the
growth of magnetic field
• Firehose dominates, resonant, Bell, Weibel…
• Cosmic ray acceleration kinetics can be solved
self-consistently in this background
27 i 2012
AronsFest
29
Particle drifts and current
Normal approach is to analyze particle orbits and deduce currents
Can also start from static equilibrium and understand what is happening
Curvature perpendicular magnetization gradient ExB
Parallel current contains a part that is magnetization drift
Also a part that is resistive – collisional/radiative
27 i 2012
AronsFest
30
Conjectures
• Unipolar inductor potential differences
maintained into jets and nebulae
• Pinches (relatively) stabilized by flow,
expansion…
• Highest energy particles with largest gyro
radii carry current and dissipate
resistively through radiation
• Steady and explosive instability generic
leading to in situ acceleration and emission
27 i 2012
AronsFest
31
Summary
• Major challenges to particle acceleration from
Crab, blazar flares UHECR…
• Hybrid – fluid/kinetic problems
• Currents may be carried by highest energy
particles and dissipation can be primarily
radiative
• May be possible to gain insight at fluid level
using anisotropic RMHD
• Drift currents etc can emerge from MHD rather
than vice versa
• Particle trajectories must still be solved in this
background
27 i 2012
AronsFest
32