Transcript DINAS PENDIDIKAN KAB. SUKABUMI A formal method of interactive and representational argument.  Consist of two teams debating over an issue, more commonly called a topic or proposition.

DINAS PENDIDIKAN KAB. SUKABUMI
2012
A
formal method of
interactive and
representational
argument.
 Consist of two teams
debating over an issue,
more commonly called a
topic or proposition or
motion
 Encouraged in high
schools and colleges
A
means of encouraging critical
thinking.
A means of personal
expressions.
Tolerance of others' opinions.
Chair Person
Time Keeper
Affirmative
Negative
Team
Team
Adjudicators
Affirmative:
Negative:
 1st
Speaker
 1st
Speaker
 2nd
Speaker
 2nd
Speaker
 3rd
Speaker
 3rd
Speaker
 Reply
Speaker
 Reply
Speaker
 Substantive
Speech:
1st Speaker : 4 minutes
2nd Speaker : 4 minutes
3rd Speaker : 3 minutes
 Reply Speech:
2 minutes
 Has
the right to define
the motion.
 Support it with
constructive arguments.
Oppose
the motion defined by the
Affirmative.
Build a counter-case against the
Affirmative.
Challenge the definition if invalid
only.
 Relevance
 Organization
 Consistency
& internal
logic
 Clarity
 Effective use of
evidence


The process of proving
that the opposing team’s
arguments should be
accorded less weight
than its claim.
Showing how & why the
opposition’s arguments
are invalid.
 Based
on a wrong of facts/ interpretation of
facts.
 Irrelevant to the topic.
 Illogical.
 Involving unacceptable implications.
Affirmative:
 Defines the motion.
 Presents the team’s theme line  why the
case is logically correct.
 Outlines the team split.
 Delivers 1st substantial argument.
 Provide a brief summary of the case.
Negative:
 Accepts/challenges the definition.
 Rebut 1st affirmative’s arguments.
 Presents the theme line.
 Outlines the theme split.
 Delivers 1st substantial arguments.
 Provides a brief summary.
Affirmative:
 Rebuts the 1st negative’s arguments.
 Restates the affirmative team’s case.
 Delivers 2nd substantial speech.
 Provides a brief summary.
Negative:
 Rebuts the two affirmative speakers.
 Restates the team’s case.
 Delivers the 2nd substantial arguments.
 Provides a brief summary.
Affirmative:
 Rebuts the two negative speakers.
 Restates the theme line & the two speakers’
arguments.
 Summarizes the issues of the debate.
Negative:
 Rebuts all three affirmative speakers.
 Restates the theme line & the two speakers’
arguments.
 Summarizes the issues of the debate
 Provide
an overview of the debate.
 Identify the issues by both sides.
 Provide a biased adjudication of the debate.
 The
process of
determining which
team wins the debate.
 Matter: 40
 Manner: 40
 Method: 20
The matter category assesses the content of a
speech and of the team’s case overall. It includes
the arguments used to build up the team’s own case
and prove their case line and the rebuttal of the
opposing team’s case. Ideally a speaker should have
a range of arguments that are not internally
contradictory and each of these arguments should be
illustrated and backed up by examples. A speaker
should also demonstrate the ability to priorities
material according to its strength.
A speaker who performs well in the
matter category will usually:










Have several arguments to support the team’s case and emphasis each argument in
accordance with its strength and importance in the debate.
Back the arguments up with examples that are NOT drawn from personal experience.
Ensure that all arguments presented by the team are consistent, ie that there is no
contradiction between different lines of argument used by the team.
Avoid debating by listing a string of examples to prove your case.
Display an understanding of what the team needs to establish in order to win the argument
(eg is the debate a cost-benefit analysis? one where two different models must be
compared?)
Demonstrate an ability to adapt and alter pre-prepared material to take into account the
other team’s interpretation of the topic and the direction the debate takes as it progresses.
Introduce or reinforce points that have been or will be made by other members of the team.
Display good general knowledge of the topic area.
Identify and rebut the major themes of the other team’s case. Attempt to attack the
foundations of the other team’s arguments, as opposed to just rebutting by listing counterexamples.
Defend the team’s case from attack by the opposition, ideally by contrasting the different
approaches of the team to each issue and explaining why your team’s approach is superior.

Points awarded under the heading of manner are designed to
assess how effectively each speaker presented his or her speech
and engages with the audience. Manner is therefore extremely
important. Unfortunately, students often fail to appreciate its
significance and weight in the marking scheme. There is no ‘right’
way of presenting a speech, as the manner category is deliberately
flexible enough to encourage and reward individual style.
Debaters are encouraged to experiment with different styles of
presentation, including within a single speech. Some students may
wish to use humour, passion, sincerity and alike to effectively
communicate their speech.

Factors such as vocal style, eye contact, gestures and the use of
palm cards are also relevant to manner.
Generally, speakers who score well in MANNER often:
• Speak articulately so the audience can easily
comprehend the speech.
• Use palm cards (text) minimally.
• Not use slang words too much, overly technical jargon
or pompous language.
• Vary the pace of delivery during their speech to add
contrast between points.
• Vary the tone of voice during their speech to create
different moods.
• Maintain steady eye contact with all members of the
audience.
• Use gestures, while not being overly repetitive.
• Assume a standing position that is not distracting. For
instance, continuous pacing may be distracting for the
audience.


The method category marks the way in which each speaker
structures and organizes their speech. It also takes into
account how a team performs as a whole in structuring and
organizing their case. Introducing elements such as internal
case structure and sensible time management aids the
audience and the adjudicator to comprehend and follow each
individual speech and team case as a whole.
At the higher levels of competition it is expected that teams
will take a thematic approach to the topic, rather than a mere
collection of independent points. Teams that score well in
the method category also respond and adapt to the
development of the debate. This may involve making
strategic decisions, such as choosing to emphasize one point
over a weaker point. It is also important that speakers who
appear later in the debate reinforce points established earlier
by their team.








Define the topic of the debate (if affirmative). This may involve
identifying the burden of proof or perhaps setting a test which
the team must fulfill to establish their case.
Refer back to a central theme that underpins their team case.
Adhere to a case split provided by the first speaker. The division
of substantial material between the first and second speakers
should be sensible and effective.
Logically and smoothly progress through each idea, taking care
to introduce each new point.
Make full use of the available time, while not exceeding the time
limit by more than 30 seconds.
Divide this time wisely between rebutting all major points of the
opposing team's case and thoroughly establishing each
substantial point.
A firm conclusion of their speech and the team case as a whole.
Keep within the parameters of the speaker's role.
SMA/SMK
1. Pada babak awal (pre-elemenary round) untuk babak
kedua dengan sistem scoring (big sixteen) dengan
single adjudicator
2. Pada babak ke-2 s.d. final, Big Sixteen akan
dipertandingkan untuk mendapatkan Big Eight dengan
sistim GUGUR;
3. Pengundian motion untuk babak 1 dilaksanakan pada
saat Technical meeting, babak ke-2 sehari sebelum
tampil, babak semifinal & final dilaksanakan 1 jam
sebelum bertanding
WSDC Sistem menggunakan PoI (Point of Information)
 PoI dilakukan saat regu lawan sedang menyampaikan
Subtantive Speech
 Waktu PoI adalah : menit 2-3 (untuk 1st and 2nd
speaker
 Menit kedua untuk 3rd speaker
 Peserta yang ingin PoI harus minta izin pada regu
lawan (dengan mengangkat tangan), dan boleh
berbicara setelah dipersilahkan
 Regu yang di PoI boleh menerima atau menolak PoI
 PoI memiliki nilai tersendiri dalam debat (kebijakan
juri)

KLIK DISINI
CLICK
HERE