VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INDICATORS ON SCOPE, PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE... REFLECTIONS ON VAW EGM REPORT 2007 Dr Henrica A.
Download
Report
Transcript VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INDICATORS ON SCOPE, PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE... REFLECTIONS ON VAW EGM REPORT 2007 Dr Henrica A.
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
INDICATORS ON SCOPE,
PREVALENCE AND INCIDENCE...
REFLECTIONS ON VAW EGM REPORT 2007
Dr Henrica A. F. M. Jansen
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics
Geneva, 8 October 2008
INTRODUCTION
General considerations for indicators on VAW
Overview proposed indicators on VAW
Comments for reflection and discussion
"Not everything that counts can be counted,
and not everything that can be counted
counts."
(Sign hanging in Einstein's
office at Princeton)
INDICATORS....
Need to provide a simple summary
of a complex picture
Need to present features to support informed
decision making, policy and programs
Need to be sensitive enough to measure
change (periodicity)
Need to enable international comparisons
(remember “SMART”???)
ISSUES FOR SELECTION OF INDICATORS
No indicator is perfect
It is important to be aware of potential
weaknesses
The range of indicators to be used changes
according to the purpose and context
If you use of a group of indicators that reflect
different aspects of VAW than you get a
better idea of the bigger picture
Disaggregation of indicators (sex, age,
rural/urban, etc.)
PRIORITIZE BASED ON
Availability of data sources
Feasibility and sustainability of data collection
Not overburden States
Indicators can be an incentive towards
systematic and accelerated data collection
(accompanied by capacity building
and institutional development)
TWO MAIN TYPES OF INDICATORS ON VAW
Outcome indicators:
To measure the extent of the phenomenon
(included in EGM report)
Process indicators for policy development and
implementation to measure the States’
responses to the problem
(indicators developed elsewhere)
AVAILABLE DATA SOURCES FOR
VAW INDICATORS
Surveys done: VAW/IPV/DV/GBV
(by type, time, perpetrators)
Reported violence, through administrative and
crime statistics
Issues: comparability reliability...
AVAILABLE DATA SOURCES: SURVEYS
2006: In region covered by Conference of
European Statisticians: 25 national surveys in
17 countries
Half conducted by/with NSOs
National dedicated surveys
Internationally comparative surveys
Module added to other surveys (cheaper,
limited, more under-reporting, safety issues)
DATA COLLECTED ON VAW IN SURVEYS
Almost all surveys give indicators of prevalence.
Many also on frequency
Almost all on perpetrators
Surveys carried out by many national statistical
offices and other institutions, however as ad
hoc activity
Attitudes sometimes collected -- Issues around
usefulness
MANY SURVEYS FOCUS ON IPV
This may not be the most common form of VAW,
depending on context
Demand driven indicators are needed with a
regional dimension
REPORT OF EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON
VAW INDICATORS, 2007
Limited to scope, prevalence and incidence of VAW
Give a overview of existing initiatives for the
development of indicators
Proposing and international framework for indicators
on VAW
Recommending a course of action for different
stakeholders at global, regional and national level
and donors.
ONE SINGLE VS SEPARATE INDICATORS
One indicator on the prevalence of all forms of
VAW justified in terms of possible misuse of
disaggregated data to stigmatize communities..
However:
Not
simple
Not easy to interpret, different contexts
Not related to existing data sources
Not clear how to assess over time
Not comparable transnational etc etc
PROPOSED INDICATORS
DIMENSIONS
Physical violence
Sexual violence
Intimate partner violence
Harmful practices
FGM
Early marriage (<18y)
severity
Perpetrator
Frequency
Last
year
Lifetime
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PROPOSED INDICATORS
Data source
Physical violence
Sexual violence
Intimate partner violence
Harmful practices
FGM
Early marriage (<18y)
Survey
Survey
Survey
???
Survey/records??
Contextual?
Need to reconsider harmful practices
PROPOSED INDICATORS
Measurement issues
Physical violence
Acts/freq/sev
Sexual violence
Acts/freq/else?
Intimate partner violence
Phys and/or sex
who is partner??
FUTURE WORK TO EXPAND THE SET OF
INDICATORS
Killing of women by intimate partners
Female infanticide
Threats of violence
Economic and emotional violence as part of IPV
“Honour” crimes
Dowry related violence
Issues:
Sexual exploitation
Different data sources!!
Trafficking
Different levels of feasibility
Femicide
Consider including Child
Forced marriage
Sexual Abuse
Sexual harassment
OPERALIZATION – HOW?
Operationalization of the different
types of violence in terms of acts/injuries
(methodological work in ongoing)
Severity, threshold (including frequency,
injuries, impact?)
Incidents/Frequency?
STRENGTH: FOCUS ON SEVERITY AND INCIDENTS
PREVALENCE POSSIBLY NOT BE THE BEST
INDICATOR (WALBY)
Advantages
Uses
concept of DV as a ‘course of conduct’
Conventional measure among DV experts
Disadvantages
Hard
to translate into crime statistics, which are
based on number of ‘incidents’
Does not contain measure of severity
Specialised, not mainstream, indicator
SEVERITY OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE
AND CRIME STATISTICS (WALBY)
Frequency/Incidents
Crimes
are counted as incidents
If dv/gender based violence is to be mainstreamed
into crime statistics there needs to be an incident
count
Injuries
Violent
crime categories are differentiated primarily
by injury level, though also intent
To mainstream, injuries need to be known for each
incident
STRENGTHS
Moving towards “mainstreaming” vaw
Moving towards more inclusive vaw (not only
DV/IPV)
OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Special surveys vs. Modules
Standardized/harmonised
methodology – possible/desirable?
Realistic expectations of indicators – provides
baseline, but not likely to see dramatic changes
in prevalence in the short term
Women’s safety as priority
It really counts,
And it needs to be counted!!!
THANK
YOU!!
[email protected]