UNECE Work Session Geneva, 11-13 September 2006 Fourth Session Item 5. Dissemination, Marketing and Use of Gender Statistics The experience of Eurostat Anatole Tokofai*, Eurostat, Labour.
Download ReportTranscript UNECE Work Session Geneva, 11-13 September 2006 Fourth Session Item 5. Dissemination, Marketing and Use of Gender Statistics The experience of Eurostat Anatole Tokofai*, Eurostat, Labour.
UNECE Work Session Geneva, 11-13 September 2006 Fourth Session Item 5. Dissemination, Marketing and Use of Gender Statistics The experience of Eurostat Anatole Tokofai*, Eurostat, Labour Market Unit (*) the views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the ones of the European Commission Outline • Historical perspective and review of Gender equality policy • Gender Statitics Currently Available • Range of dissemination products • Distribution channels and modalities • Analysis of data users • Matching dissemination tools with the different types of users Historical perspective • Gender statistics historically developed to serve the needs of policy-makers at Community level • Therefore, strong link with Community gender equality policy • Community Gender Equality policy designed to provide a common framework co-existing with diverse national legislations, and providing harmonisation, respect of subsidiarity principle Review of gender equality policy • Equal pay for equal work or (for work of equal value) included in the initial Treaty of Rome (1958) • Policy actions in the 70s: Equal pay Directive 75/117, equal treatment Directive (76/207) • European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings • Until the 1990s, gender equality policy mainly limited to employment and work place Review of gender equality policy • This was reflected in the limited scope of gender statistics collected at Community level • Maastricht Treaty(1993) enabled progress in social policy, hence in gender equality policy (e.g. health and safety at work; involvement of social partners, reconciliation between work and family life) • But still limited to a large extent to the workplace • At global level, impact of Beijing Conf., MDGs Review of gender equality policy • Amsterdam Treaty (1999) extended gender equality to all fields of action of the Community (TEC, Articles 2, 3 & 13) • Enabled adoption of secondary legislation: Community Framework Strategy on Gender Equality (20012005), to be followed by Community Roadmap for Gender Equality (20062010) Review of gender equality policy • The Framework Strategy (2001-2005) foresees: the development and dissemination of comparable statistics on the situation of women and men • Adotpion of a gender mainstreaming: integration of gender perspective into every stage of policy processes • Implication for Eurostat: ensure that all statistics collected on individuals at EUlevel are disaggregated by sex Available gender statistics • Available databases Demography, international migration and asylum, census and population projection, health, labour force, Earnings, Income and living conditions, Education, LLL, training, Human resources in science and technology, ICT usage, Time use surveys + ongoing work on childcare, crime and victimisation, VAW • Structural indicators (pre-defined tables): Employment growth, Average exit age from labour force, gender pay gap, lll, accidents at work, Unemployment rate, S&T graduates, E-government usage, at-risk of poverty rate, early school leavers, women and men aged 18-59, living in jobless hh, healthy life years at birth Range of data dissemination products - On-line data for download from Eurostat website - Microdata data for researchers (Labour Force Survey, European Survey on Income and Living Conditions, Structure of Earnings Surveys) - Eurostat publications • Statistics in Focus – all gender-related topics • Working Papers • Pocketbooks – How men and women spend their time • Panorama series - The life of women and men in Europe - Policy reports: deriving directly from Treaty or from secondary legislation - Press releases – Women’s day - On going work: gender profile portal, data in focus series Dissemination channels and modalities Eurostat web site as main channel - Adoption in October 2004 of a free dissemination policy: provide in EN/DE/FR users with data and other products (non confidential data, on-line publications) free of charge - Results: increase of data users, especially nonprofessionals (web site traffic multiplied by 6 from Sep. 2004 to Apr. 2005) Other channels - Websites of National Statistical Institutes (NSIs) - EU Bookshops and information relays - Commercial redistribution companies Types of users - Policy departments of the Commission (S.G., Employment, Education/Culture, EcFin,…) - Other EU Institutions, National governments - National Statistical Institutes (NSIs) - Journalists - Social partners (Organisations of employees and of employers) - Lobbyists, women advocates, NGOs - Research organisations, Universities - Consultants, private enterprises - General public Matching between products and type of users Matching gender statistics products with user groups. Type of Users Gen. Journ NGOs public alists/ interm Dissemination ediari Products es Online data Microdata Working papers SiFs Structural indicators Policy reports Pocketbooks/ Panorama series Press releases Legend Good matching Moderate matching Low matching Social Women EU Nat’l/ Advoc Institu Reg. Part. ates tions. Gvts Comm. Consul NSIs/ 'policy' tants/ Resea services rch private org firms Conclusion • Production and dissemination of gender statistics initially linked with development of Community gender equality policy • Momentum reached with Amsterdam Treaty, Community Framework Strategy on Gender Equality (2001-2005), adoption of the gender mainstreaming approach (foreseen/on-going policy actions: establishment of Gender Equality Institute, Implementation of Roadmap on G. Equality, 2007: year of equal opportunity for all) • Wide range of products designed to serve the needs of policymakers (e.g. stat. Annexes of policy report, structural indicators) and other professional users • Emergence of new type of users after the adoption of free dissemination policy • Eurostat strategy to be more balanced towards different usergroups • more account of the needs of growing user groups (general public, non-professionals), while continuing to support the design and implementation of EU policies, particularly in the field of gender equality Employment rates Employment rates (women and men aged 15 - 64) in EU Member States- 2004 Women Men 90 Lisbon target for total employment rate in 2010 80 70.9 70 55.7 60 Lisbon target for women's employment rate in 2010 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 DK SE NL FI UK PT AT SI EE DE CY LV Source: Eurostat, Labour Force Survey (LFS). LT FR IE CZ EU- BE SK HU LU ES PL EL 25 IT MT Part-time employment Share of part-time workers in total employment, in EU Member States - 2005 Women Men 80 70 60 % 50 40 32,6 30 20 7,4 10 0 SK HU CZ LT EL EE SI LV CY PL PT Source: Eurostat, Labour Force Survey (LFS), Spring results. NB: Exceptions to the reference year: LU: 2004. LU: annual average instead of spring result. FI MT IE ES IT FR EU- DK 25 AT SE LU BE UK DE NL Gender pay gap in unadjusted form Pay gap between women and men in unadjusted form in EU Member States - 1998 and 2003 (Difference between men’s and women’s average gross hourly earnings as a percentage of men’s average gross hourly earnings) 1998 (1) 2003 (2) 30 25 20 17 % 15 15 10 5 0 MT IT SI PT GR PL BE FR IE HU EU25 LU LV SE LT AT DK ES NL CZ FI UK DE SK EE Source: Eurostat. Administrative data are used for LU. All other sources are national surveys except as follows: 2003: Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SIC) for EL, IE and AT. The results for the first year of this new EU survey are provisional and subject to further quality assessment. They should therefore be interpreted with caution. 2002 :European Community Household Panel (ECHP) for EL 2001 and before: European Community Household Panel (ECHP) for BE, DE, IT, DK, IE, UK, EL, ES, PT, AT and FI. NB: EU-25 estimates are population-weighted averages of the latest available national values adjusted where possible, to take into account a change in the data source. Exceptions to the reference years: (1) 1999 for PLand SK; 2000 for MT. (2) 2001 for BE and IT; 2002 for SI and FI. DK - A change of data source from 2002 is estmated to have increased the gender pay gap value by 4 percentagepoints. DE - From 2002 national earnings surveys and the German Socio-Economic Panel have been used. This is estmated to have increased the gender pay gap value by 1 percentagepoint. ES - From 2002 data from tax returns and the labour force survey have been used. This is estmated to have increased the gender pay gap value by 3 percentagepoints. FI - A change of data source from 2002 is estmated to have increased the gender pay gap value by 4 percentagepoints. UK - A change of data source from 2002 is estmated to have increased the gender pay gap value by 2 percentagepoints. CY At-risk of poverty rates 1 At- risk-o f-p overty rate af ter so cial tran sf ers f or w om en an d m en ag ed 16 years and o ver in EU Mem b er states, 2003 2 Wom en Men 25 20 15 15 % 13 10 5 0 CZ LU HU NL FR SI SE BE DK FI MT AT PL LT EU 25 DE LV CY UK IT SK EE ES EL PT IE Sourc e: Eurostat, National s ourc es. N B: 1) At-risk -of-poverty rate after s oc ial trans fers - The s hare of pers ons w ith an equiv alis ed dis posabl e inc ome below the ris k-of-pov erty threshold, whic h is 60% of the national median equiv alised dispos able incom e (after s oc ial transfers ). Gender break down is bas ed on as sum ption of equal s haring of res ourc es within hou sehold. 2) Exc eptions to the referen ce year: M T: 200 0; IT , PT and SE: 2004 BE, D E, EL,ES, F R, IE, IT, LU, N L and PT hav e us ed a different m ethodology for the c alculation of the At-risk -of-pov erty and res ults are not c om parable w ith other c ontries . H oweve r c omparis ons between wom en and m en w ithin M S are still valid and it is not lik ely that the ranking of the c ountries would differ m uc h by us ing the s ame m ethodology as the rest. Educational attainment Educational attainment (at least upper secondary school) of women and men aged 20 - 24, in EU Member States - 2004 women men 100 79.1 90 73.8 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 SI EE PL SK CZ LT IE FI SE EL BE AT HU CY LV FR EU25 Source: Eurostat, Labour Force Survey (LFS), Spring results. NB: DE, EL, IE, IT and EU-25: Provisional value. Exceptions to the reference year: LU and NL: 2003. CY: students abroad are not covered. DK NL UK DE IT ES LU PT MT Academic career W om e n M en Re la tiv e s ha r e o f w o m e n a nd m e n in a ty p ic a l a c a d e m ic c a r e e r fo r E U- 2 5 - 2 0 0 3 85 9 0 8 0 68 70 59 6 0 54 57 58 54 50 % 43 4 0 42 46 46 32 41 3 0 15 2 0 10 0 ISC ED 5A Enr olme n ts ISC ED 5A G r a d u at e s IS CED 6 En r o lme n ts IS CED 6 G r a d ua t es G ra d e C G r a de B G r a de A S ou r c e : Eu r o p e an Co mm is s ion , R es e a r c h D G , W iS d a ta b a s e. A G r a d e : th e s in g le h ig h e st g r a d e /p o st a t w h ic h r e s e a r c h is no r m a lly c o nd u c te d w ith in th e in st it u tion a l o r c o r p o r a te s y s te m. B G r a de : r e se a r c h e r s w o r king in p o s it io n s n o t as se n ior a s to p p o s it io n b u t mo r e s e n io r th a n th e n e w ly q ua lif ie d Ph D h old e r s . C G r a d e: T h e f ir s t gr ad e /p o s t in to w hic h a n e w ly q u a lif ie d PhD ( IS CED 6 ) gr ad u a te w o u ld n or ma lly b e r e c r u ite d w ith in th e ins t it ut io n a l o r c o r p o r a te s y s te m. ISC ED 5A : T e r tia r y p r o g r a mme s t o p r o v id e s u f f ic ie n t qu a lif ic a tion s t o e n te r in to a d v a nc e d r e s e a r c h p r o gr am me s & p r o f e s s io n s w ith h igh skills r eq u ir e me n ts . IS CED 6 : T e r tia r y p r o g r a mme s w h ic h le a d t o a n a dv a n c ed r e se a r c h q u a lif ica t io n ( Ph D ) . N B : IS C ED 5 A En r o lm en t s : Ex c e p tion to t he r e f e r e nc e y e a r L U : 19 9 9 ; EL : 2 0 02 ; D at a u n av a ila b le f o r F R ISC ED6 En r o lme n ts : Ex c e p tion to t he r e f e r e nc e y e a r EL : 2 00 2 ; Da t a u na v a ila b le f or F R, L U , D E, SI G r ad e C, B , A :Ex c e pt io n t o th e r ef er en c e y e a r : CY :2 0 02 ; F R, PT :2 0 0 1; EL :2 0 0 0; N L : F T E, SI: Da ta es t im at e d, F R : G r a d e C u na v a ila b le ; Da t a u n av a ila b le f o r IE a n d L U. Healthy life years at birth Healthy life years at birth; the number of years that a person is expected to live in absence of limitations in functioning/disability, 2003 y ears Women Men 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 IT CY AT BE ES PL EL MT IE DE FR CZ SE PT DK UK NL HU FI Source: Eurostat NB : Estimations are applied for mortality data and prevalence of disability was extrapolated on data of previous years: 1995-2001; for DE and UK: 1997-2001 Exceptions to the reference year: BE, MT and PL: 2002. Data are not available for EE, LU, LV, LT, S I and S K. Average age of women at birth of first child Average age of women at birth of first child - 1999 and 2003 1999 (1) Ag e 2003 (2) 30 27,5 25 22,5 20 LT EE LV SK PL CZ HU CY AT PT SI DK EL FI FR Source: Eurostat, Demography statistics. NB: Exceptions to the reference years: (1) DK and IT : 1996; BE: 1997. No data are available for MT. (2) DK and FR: 2001; EE, EL, ES and UK : 2002. No data are available for BE, IT and MT. IE SE LU DE NL ES UK BE IT