Please read this before using presentation • This presentation is based on content presented at the industry information session on risk-based hygiene.
Download ReportTranscript Please read this before using presentation • This presentation is based on content presented at the industry information session on risk-based hygiene.
Please read this before using presentation • This presentation is based on content presented at the industry information session on risk-based hygiene management planning held in May 2015 • It is made available for non-commercial use (e.g. toolbox meetings, OHS discussions) subject to the condition that the PowerPoint file is not altered without permission from Resources Safety • Supporting resources, such as brochures and posters, are available from Resources Safety • For resources, information or clarification, please contact: [email protected] or visit www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 1 Our commitment To work with industry to reduce serious accidents and incidents, and provide tangible support in achieving a positive cultural change. www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 2 Resources Safety’s focus www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 3 What is risk-based hygiene management planning and how does it relate to CONTAM? www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 4 Why the change from CONTAM? CONTAM • Was initiated to get sites conducting personal exposure monitoring for certain contaminants – specifically dusts and respirable silica • Targeted contaminants known to be present or generated in the majority of Western Australian mining operations www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 5 Was it risk-based? CONTAM • did not require the identification or investigation of exceedances, nor the implementation or effectiveness monitoring of controls • didn’t allow for ‒ changes in mining operations and work populations ‒ SEG formation ‒ recognition of health hazards other than particulateform atmospheric contaminants *SEG = similar exposure groups www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 6 So what do we need to do now (May 2015)? CONTAM will remain as a results database in the short-term Over the next 12 months, sites will enter their health- and hygiene-related data directly into the Safety Regulation System (SRS) www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 7 What else do we need to do now (May 2015)? Continue to use the financial year as your time gauge for sampling programs That means, getting ready over the next month for the 2015-16 program www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 8 Risk-based Hygiene Management Plan (RBHMP) • Termed management planning to align with the ‘principal hazard management planning’ of the proposed new legislation • Being risk-based means: – non-prescriptive – its effectiveness is wholly based on the knowledge, competence, and commitment of the people involved in its development and implementation www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 9 RBHMP is an opportunity to … work out exactly what is going on in your workplaces • What are your personnel actually and potentially exposed to? • How are they protected (or not) from those exposures? • What needs to be done for their protection in the short-term and long-term? • How do you confirm whether you got it right (or not) in relation to control implementation? • What do you have in place to continuously monitor and review? www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 10 What is your role? You have a choice – do it right the first time or don’t Worst thing you can do is to shirk your responsibility by going for something generic, and missing out on an opportunity to identify and manage the health hazards specific to your site www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 11 Start Workplace characterisation Exposure assessment Acceptable exposure Uncertain Unacceptable exposure Control Further information gathering Monitor and review www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 12 Start www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 13 Establish the goals What does your site want to achieve from RBHMP? ─ Where is your site in relation to its mine life and maturity of health and hygiene management? Role and responsibility identification ─ Depending on the size of your site and its hierarchical structure, you might be doing all things, one thing, or nothing www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 14 Start Workplace characterisation www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 15 Characterise your workplace Gather information that will be used to understand the tasks being performed, materials being used, processes being run and controls in place, so that a picture of exposure conditions can be made! www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 16 Gather workplace information www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 17 Break it down www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 18 Break it down further! www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 19 Gather workplace information Include ‘the forgotten’ • Is there haulage? • Is exploration happening? • Is rehabilitation happening? • Is there an airstrip? • Is there an accommodation village? www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 20 Gather workforce information Use a variety of resources: • Rosters • Job descriptions • Worker interviews • OBSERVATION • OBSERVATION • OBSERVATION www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 21 Gather health hazard information Consider each potentially hazardous agent: • Physical ─ Noise ─ Vibration ─ Radiation ─ Temperature (heat or cold) ─ Ergonomics • Chemical • Biological www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 22 Health effects information The information you define here will assist with identifying whether an exposure is acceptable or unacceptable • Toxicology and/or health impact potential • Acute versus cumulative • OELs and BEIs (and adjustment) * OEL = Occupational exposure limit * BEI = Biological exposure index www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 23 www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 24 Start Workplace characterisation Exposure assessment www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 25 Exposure assessment – Define SEGs Steps to defining SEGs: 1. Observation • • • • • Classification by task and environmental agent Classification by task, process and environmental agent Classification by task, process, job description, and environmental agent Classification by work teams Classification by non-repetitive work tasks or jobs www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 26 Define SEGs 2. Sampling • Relies on the review of previously collected data to classify the workforce • Requires sufficient sample data and high degree of statistical confidence • Often difficult to do well, particularly where monitoring records are poor and information collected about the sampling environment is sparse A combined observation and sampling approach is the most PRACTICAL method of defining a SEG www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 27 Exposure assessment – exposure profiles Summarises and judges exposures to health hazards in the workplace • Combine information from the basic characterisation with the SEG information • Exposure rating – use your site criteria – Estimate of exposure relative to the OEL – Considers monitoring data, surrogate data, prediction www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 28 Start Workplace characterisation Exposure assessment Acceptable exposure Uncertain Unacceptable exposure Control Further information gathering Monitor and review www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 29 Exposure profile - acceptability • Acceptable? • Unacceptable? • Uncertain? Acceptable Unacceptable / Uncertain www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 30 Managing uncertainty and unacceptability Sample number determination Let’s talk about: • Confidence limits • Baseline versus maintenance versus campaign • Quarterly numbers • Random selection N (size of group) # (number of samples required) ≤6 7-8 9-11 12-14 15-18 19-26 27-43 44-50 51+ 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 (reference: Leidel, Busch and Lynch, 1977, NIOSH) www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 31 Results strategy You have to know from the start what you are going to do in the event that: • You receive an anomalous result or exceedance • Your baseline data confirms acceptable or unacceptable exposures • Your baseline data confirms SEG unacceptability • Your maintenance data contradicts baseline www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 32 SEG acceptability Confirmation of SEG by statistical analysis Review and redefining the SEG where necessary www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 33 www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 34 Controls The list provided in the procedure does not represent all health hazards and associated controls, and should only be used as an example … and what about monitoring and review? www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 35 RBHMP approval, re-assessment and quota proposal • What do you do when you have generated a RBHMP document? • When should you review and update it? • And what about the sampling numbers? Contact [email protected] if you need to know the answers to these questions www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 36 Stay informed! Subscribe to our email alert service and receive weekly news about: • recent publications • latest safety alerts • events • what’s happening at Resources Safety. Visit www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety to sign up www.dmp.wa.gov.au/ResourcesSafety 37