Tucson, AZ September 16 ADVOCACY ADVANCE ACTION 2020 WORKSHOP WORKSHOP ACTION 2020  Action 2020 Workshop Welcome     Advocacy Advance Partnership Goal: Maximize federal funding for bike/ped projects at the state, local,

Download Report

Transcript Tucson, AZ September 16 ADVOCACY ADVANCE ACTION 2020 WORKSHOP WORKSHOP ACTION 2020  Action 2020 Workshop Welcome     Advocacy Advance Partnership Goal: Maximize federal funding for bike/ped projects at the state, local,

1
Tucson, AZ
September 16
ADVOCACY ADVANCE
ACTION
2020 WORKSHOP
WORKSHOP
ACTION 2020

Action 2020 Workshop
Welcome




Advocacy Advance Partnership
Goal: Maximize federal funding for bike/ped
projects at the state, local, and regional levels
Reports, technical assistance & coaching, grants,
workshops
www.AdvocacyAdvance.org
Agenda
8:30
9:15
10:00
10:30
10:40
11:45
12:30
1:30
2:00
3:45
4:00
4:30
Welcome & Introductions
Funding Programs Overview
Information from the Local Context
Break
Road Map for Success
Elected Officials Q&A
Lunch
Straight from the Headlines
Walkabout
Next Steps Discussion
Conclusion
 Folder resources
Social Event

What we won’t cover today
Introductions




Name
Organization / Agency
Position
What brought you here today?
Workshop Goals







Identify sources of funding for bicycle and pedestrian
projects
Learn about funding sources for non-infrastructure projects
Learn examples from other places
Make biking and walking a priority in our community
Demonstrate public interest and support for bike/ped
improvements
Develop action items to improve walking and bicycling
conditions in the region
Establish and improve local, state, and regional relationships
Working Together
Elected Officials
•
•
•
•
Set priorities
Vision
Budget
Public Accountability
Advocates
• Knowledge of local needs
• Represent the public will
• Demonstrate community
support
• Organize
Agency Staff
•
•
•
•
Technical expertise
Knowledge of the process
Project selection
Get stuff done
Programs
Characteristics, requirements, and opportunities
of under-utilized funding sources that exist for
biking and walking projects and programs
Outline
Program features
 Bike/ped eligibility
 Project examples
 Case study
Think about
 Federal vs. state and
regional policy
 Programming decisions
 Who, What, Where,
When, How
 Resources in folder
Federal-Aid Highway Programs




Surface Transportation
Program (STP)
Highway Safety
Improvement Program
(HSIP)
Section 402 Safety
Grants
Congestion Mitigation
and Air Quality
Improvement (CMAQ)



Transportation
Enhancements
Safe Routes to Schools
Recreational Trails
Federal-Aid Bike/Ped Spending
1992-2010
Trending in the Right Direction
Growth in Bicycle Commuting
Federal-Aid Highway Programs




Surface Transportation
Program (STP)
Highway Safety
Improvement Program
(HSIP)
Section 402 Safety
Grants
Congestion Mitigation
and Air Quality
Improvement (CMAQ)



Transportation
Enhancements
Safe Routes to Schools
Recreational Trails
Surface Transportation Program (STP)




Flexible funding
Construction of bicycle
transportation facilities
and walkways
Non-construction
projects related to
safe bicycle use
80% Federal Share
STP Example: Peoria Project Rating
Criteria




Before 2006, project
selection was not
quantified
MPO asked League of
Illinois Bicyclists for
suggestions
Peoria MPO created
new quantitative criteria
Most projects now
include bike/ped
accommodations
Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP)





Safety infrastructure
All public roads are
eligible
Bike lanes, roadway
shoulders, crosswalks,
signage
Data driven
90% Federal Share
HSIP Examples: Virginia and Florida

Virginia:
 “Fair
share for safety”
 10% set-aside
 Project selection
focused on corridors

Florida:
 High
bicycle fatalities
 $5 million in 2009
 $5.5 million in 2010
Section 402 State and Community
Highway Safety Grant Program




NHTSA & FHWA
Non-infrastructure
Bicycle and pedestrian
safety and education
programs
Run by local advocacy
groups
Section 402 Examples






Share the Road
program (Atlanta)
BikeSchool (New Jersey)
Helmet distribution
(Florida)
Pedestrian safety for
older adults
Training on ped/bike
design guidelines
“Bike Safety Month”
Section 402 Example: Bike Walk CT



CRCOG received
$20,000 grant for
bike education
program
Created Bike Walk CT
Close agency and
advocacy relationship
in development of bike
education program
Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality
Improvement Program (CMAQ)




Emission-reductions
Must be nonattainment area for
eligibility
Construction and nonconstruction projects
and programs eligible
Typically 80% federal
share
CMAQ Examples



Capital Bikeshare
(Washington, DC &
Arlington, VA)
Millennium Park
Cycling Center
(Chicago, IL)
Bike racks
(Sacramento, CA)
CMAQ Examples: Non-Construction





Bike education
(Louisville, KY)
Bike promotion
(Washington, DC)
City employee bike fleet
(Chicago, IL)
Bike map (Milwaukee,
WI & Sacramento, CA)
Bike plan (Philadelphia,
PA & Birmingham, AL)
Dedicated Funding Programs



Transportation
Enhancements
Safe Routes to School
Recreational Trails
Questions?
Break
Local Context
Ann Chanecka, Senior Transportation Planner,
Pima Association of Governments
Questions?
Road Map for Success
Favorable factors for bicycling and walking
investments
Learning Objectives


Identify opportunities for funding and support of
bicycle and pedestrian projects
Explore the meaning of institutionalizing bicycle and
pedestrian planning
Outline


Implementation through institutionalization
15 ways to fund your bicycle and pedestrian
programs
Modifying Planning and Design Documents and
Regulations
 Finding Sustainable Funding
 Building Communication, Collaboration, and Support

Introduction


Perception of a lack of funding can be one of the
biggest barriers keeping communities from
investing in bicycle and pedestrian programs
Funding and support for bicycle and pedestrian
projects can come from many different sources –
some are obvious, others are not
Institutionalization



Bicyclist and pedestrian needs are part of the
agency's mission and corporate culture
Entire organization/agency focuses on reducing
crashes involving bicyclists and pedestrians
Pedestrian considerations are automatically
included in all plans, policies and projects
Ways to Fund Bicycle & Pedestrian
Programs



Modifying Planning and Design Documents and
Regulations
Finding Sustainable Funding
Building Communication, Collaboration, and
Support
Modifying Planning and Design
Documents and Regulations
1. Policy Documents
•
•
Set the tone of the
agency or
organization
Include mission
statements that
indicate the
organization’s priorities
Modifying Planning and Design
Documents and Regulations
2. Planning Documents
•
•
Provide an opportunity
for purposefully
including bicycle and
pedestrian needs into
the planning process
Integrate pedestrian
considerations into
planning documents
Modifying Planning and Design
Documents and Regulations
3. Design Guidelines and
Standards
•
Include specifications
for street width,
sidewalk design,
intersection
construction, and
crossing facilities
Modifying Planning and Design
Documents and Regulations
4. Zoning Codes and
Land Use Regulations
Finding Sustainable Funding
5. Needs Prioritization
and Funding Criteria
•
Ensure
bicycle/pedestrian
projects are
competitive with other
transportation projects
Finding Sustainable Funding
6. Routine
Accommodation
•
Consider
bicycle/pedestrian
needs in every
transportation project
Finding Sustainable Funding
7. Combined Projects
•
Bundle smaller projects
with larger ones
Finding Sustainable Funding
8. Shovel-Ready and
Match
 One project ahead
 One match ahead
Finding Sustainable Funding
9. Dedicated Funds
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
STP
HSIP
Section 402
CMAQ
TE
SRTS
Rec Trails
Finding Sustainable Funding
10. Environmental Impact
Statements
•
•
Mitigation
Restoration
Building Communication, Collaboration
& Support
11. Bicycle and
Pedestrian Advisory
Boards
•
Creates an ongoing
system for citizen input
Building Communication, Collaboration
& Support
12. Advocacy Groups
•
•
Raise awareness
25 – 2 – 2 – 2
Building Communication, Collaboration
& Support
13. Boards and
Commissions
•
Provide policy
direction and
recommendations to
state and local
government
Building Communication, Collaboration
& Support
14. Interagency
Coordination
•
Establish cooperative
relationships and
consistent regional
priorities
Building Communication, Collaboration
& Support
15. Recognition for
Good Work
•
Show support for
bicycle/pedestrian
champions
Questions?
Panel of Elected Officials
State Representative Steve Farley, District 28
Mayor Bob Walkup, City of Tucson
Lunch
Back at 1:30
Straight from the Headlines!
Walkabout
Next Steps Discussion
Next Steps
What can you offer?
 What do you need
help with?

Advocacy Advance Resources







Workshop materials online
Reports, coaching and technical assistance
Rapid Response grants
Alliance Winning Campaigns Training in 2012,
hosted by LSA
Brighid O’Keane: [email protected]
Darren Flusche: [email protected]
www.AdvocacyAdvance.org
Thank You!