Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals Overview • Process is a critical component of land use planning and administration • Failure to follow proper.
Download ReportTranscript Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals Overview • Process is a critical component of land use planning and administration • Failure to follow proper.
Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals 1 Overview • Process is a critical component of land use planning and administration • Failure to follow proper process can result in challenges to the legitimacy of land use decisions • Discussion will focus on - adopting and amending municipal plans and bylaws - enforcement of those regulations - appeals that come as a result of land use decisions 2 Adoption and Amendment of the Municipal Plan • State law strictly prescribes adoption and amendment process • Law requires planning commission to solicit public comment • PC must hold at least one public hearing on a proposed plan • After PC hearing, PC forwards plan to legislative body 3 Adoption and Amendment of the Municipal Plan • PC must prepare written report on proposal addressing the proposal’s compliance with the state planning goals found in 24 V.S.A. § 4302 • Once PC has sent plan to legislative body, legislative body must hold at least one public hearing (more than one if more than 2,500 residents) 4 Adoption and Amendment of the Municipal Plan • State law requires minimal hearings on adoption of plan • Most planners find that holding more hearings or informal meetings to involve the public and gain public buy-in is critical 5 Adoption and Amendment of Bylaws (Regulations) • Planning commission drafts bylaws to implement the municipal plan • PC must prepare a report containing: - How the bylaw furthers the goals of the municipal plan - Its compatibility with proposed uses and densities - How it carries out specific proposals for planned community facilities 6 Adoption and Amendment of Bylaws (Regulations) • Planning commission must hold at least one hearing to consider bylaw and solicit public comment • Many planning commissions find that multiple hearings engender greater public support • PC forwards proposed bylaw to legislative body 7 Adoption and Amendment of Bylaws (Regulations) • Legislative body may make changes to the proposed bylaw • May only make “minor” changes in the 14 days preceding the first public hearing • Any time “substantial” changes are made, legislative body must hold another public hearing 8 Adoption and Amendment of Bylaws (Regulations) • Legislative body adopts bylaw by majority vote • Bylaw takes effect 21 days after adoption • Voters may petition for Australian ballot vote to consider legislative body’s vote • Voters may petition for initial voting authority, or legislative body may give away by resolution 9 Enforcement • Administrative officer (ZA) enforces land use bylaws • ZA must administer bylaws literally • Planning commission or appropriate municipal panel should not be involved in enforcement (unless it is an appeal) 10 Initiating Enforcement Proceedings • ZA may seek enforcement informally • After issuing notice of violation and waiting seven days, ZA may take further action in Environmental Court or Judicial Bureau • ZA should always consult with legislative body and municipal attorney prior to taking further action 11 Appealing Administrative Officer Decisions • Virtually any act can be appealed • Appeal goes to AMP – usually the development review board or zoning board of adjustment • AMP must determine if appellant is an “interested person” • Both appellant and ZA get to present their cases 12 Appeals to Environmental Court • Appeals from AMP are taken by the Vermont Environmental Court • Appeal is de novo • Parties are entitled to present new evidence as if no case were heard below • Practically, judge will inquire as to what happened below to better understand the case 13 Appeals to Environmental Court • No obligation for municipality to participate at this level, though some do • Some municipalities hire an attorney or designate an official to represent their interests in court • Mediation is frequently required 14 Role of the Legislative Body in the Appeals Process • Legislative body has little role at local level • Though rare, some seek to participate as a party • Legislative body may make an appearance at Environmental Court • Legislative body may appeal if the plan or bylaw is at issue 15 On the Record Review • Alternative to de novo review • Municipality must first adopt Municipal Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA) • Municipality must designate appeals to be heard on the record • Must audiotape proceedings • Chair must run an orderly meeting • Board must write strong, concise decision 16 On the Record Review • Allows decision-making to stay local • If done well, can eliminate costly appeals • Municipalities considering MAPA should undertake training to learn the process 17 Procedural Issues Summary • Following proper procedure is crucial • Land use decisions can be overturned for failure to follow procedure • Municipalities must be vigilant in understanding what state law requires and should consider education and training in procedural issues 18