Robot Grasping of Deformable Objects Yan-Bin Jia (joint work with Ph.D. students Feng Guo and Huan Lin) Department of Computer Science Iowa State University Ames,
Download ReportTranscript Robot Grasping of Deformable Objects Yan-Bin Jia (joint work with Ph.D. students Feng Guo and Huan Lin) Department of Computer Science Iowa State University Ames,
Robot Grasping of Deformable Objects Yan-Bin Jia (joint work with Ph.D. students Feng Guo and Huan Lin) Department of Computer Science Iowa State University Ames, IA 50010, USA June 5, 2014 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Rigid Body Grasping – Form Closure The object has no degree of freedom (Reuleaux, 1875). frictionless contacts 𝑦 𝑥 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Rigid Body Grasping – Force Closure The contacts can apply an arbitrary wrench (force + torque) to the object (Nguyen 1988). contact friction cones Not form closure. Form closure does not imply force closure. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Barrett Hand Grasping a Foam Object Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Deformable Body Grasping Is Difficult Form closure impossible (infinite degrees of freedom) Force closure inapplicable (changing geometry, growing contacts) High computation cost of deformable modeling (using FEM) Contact constraints needed for modeling do not exist at the start of a grasp operation. Very little research done in robotics (most limited to linear objects) Wakamatsu et al. (1996); Hirai et al. (2001); Gopalakrishnan & Goldberg (2005); Wakamatsu & Hirai (2004); Saha & Isto (2006); Ladd & Kavraki (2004) Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Displacement-Based Scheme A change of paradigm from rigid body grasping. Specify finger displacements rather than forces. Specified forces cannot guarantee equilibrium after deformation. Deformation computed under geometric constraints ensures force and torque equilibrium. Easier to command a finger to move to a place than to exert a prescribed grasping force. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Assumptions Deformable, isotropic, planar or thin 2-1/2 D object Two rigid grasping fingers coplanar with the object Frictional point or area contacts Gravity ignored Small deformation (linear elasticity) Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Linear Plane Elasticity 𝑓2 𝑓1 Displacement field: x x u y y v Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Strains Extensional strain – relative change in length after before y u y x u u x lim x 0 x x u y' x' v x v y y Shear strain – rotation of perpendicular lines toward (or away) from each other. x xy u v y x Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Finite Element Method (FEM) Strain energy: 1 T U K 2 1 : n displacements at 𝑛 nodal points K: stiffness matrix (symmetric & positive semidefinite) Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Energy Minimization Total potential energy: 1 T K T F 2 load potential F: vector of all nodal forces Deformation is described by nodal displacements that minimize Π and satisfy the boundary conditions. 0 K F Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Stiffness Matrix Null space is spanned by three 2𝑛-vectors: 1,0,,1,0 , 0,1,,0,1 , y1, x1,, yn , xn . T T T translations of all nodes rotation of all nodes Spectral decomposition: K V V V: T orthogonal matrix diag (1 ,, 2 n 3 ,0,0,0) Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Deformation from Contact Displacements Boundary nodes 𝑝𝑖1 , … , 𝑝𝑖𝑚 in contact with grasping fingers: 𝑝𝑗 𝑝𝑖 i1 im known Forces at nodes not in contact: fk 0 k i1 , , im Theorem 2 uniquely determines the displacement field (and thus the deformed shape) if 𝑚 ≥ 2. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Reduced Stiffness Matrix Forces at m contact nodes: reduced stiffness matrix F C 2m 2m Deformation: VD basis matrix of 𝐾. finger placement. Strain energy: 1 T K 2 1 T C 2 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Squeeze with Two Point Fingers i j pj Minimizing potential energy is equivalent to maximizing strain energy. pi 1 T max C 1 2 p j pi 1 Solution: uˆ 2 pi p j pi p j Stable squeeze: 𝜌𝑢 (the two point fingers move toward each other). squeeze depth Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Pure Squeeze Issues with a stable squeeze : object translation or rotation during deformation. namely, not necessarily orthogonal to null(𝐾). Pure squeeze : VD null( K ) v̂ squeeze depth Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Example for Comparison (stable squeeze) = (0.91,0.35) (pure squeeze) Deformation under 𝑢 = (0.55,0.21) Deformation under 𝑣 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Squeeze Grasp with Rounded Fingers Translate the fingers to squeeze the object. Initial point contacts 𝑝𝑖 and 𝑝𝑗 . Contact friction. Contacts growing into segments. To prevent rigid body motion, 𝑝𝑖 and 𝑝𝑗 must form force closure on an identical rigid object. 𝑝𝑖 𝑝𝑗 lies inside the two contact friction cones. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Positional Constraints & Contact Analysis Instantaneous deformation is assumed in classical elasticity theory. Deformation update during a grasp needs positional constraints. How can we predict the final contact configuration from the start? Resort to varying finger contacts Maintained by friction. Contact regions grow or shrink. Individual contact points slide or stick. Incrementally track contact configuration! Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Contact Configuration Which nodes are in contact. Which of them are sticking and which are sliding. Maintain two sets: sliding sticking 𝑇: indices of nodes sticking on a finger 𝑃: indices of nodes sliding on a finger Deformation update based on FEM: Sliding nodes → position constraints. Sticking nodes → force constraints. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Overview of Squeeze Algorithm 𝑇 and 𝑃 change whenever a contact event happens: Squeeze depth 𝜌 is sequenced by all such contact events: 𝜌0 = 0, 𝜌1 , ⋯ Between events 𝑙 and 𝑙+1, compute extra deformation ∆′ based on the current values of 𝑇 and 𝑃. Total deformation when event 𝑙+1 happens: (l 1) (l ) ' Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Contact Events Check for all values of extra squeeze depth at which a event could happen, and select the minimum. Event A – New Contact 𝑂 𝑝𝑘 𝑟 𝑂 𝑝𝑘 pk O r Event B – Contact Break fk 0 𝑝𝑘 𝑝𝑘 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University More Contact Events Event C – Stick to Slip Contact force 𝑓𝑘 is rotating out of the inward friction cone at 𝑝𝑘 . 𝜃 𝑝𝑘 𝑓𝑘 Event D – Slip to Stick The polar angle 𝜃 stops changing at squeeze depth. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Termination of Squeeze At either one of the following situations: The object can be picked up against its weight vertically. A grasping finger starts to slip. All contact nodes with the finger are slipping in the same direction. Strain at some node exceeds the material’s proportional limit. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Experiment slip stick Young’s modulus 𝐸 = 50000 Pa Poisson’s ration 𝜗 = 0.3 Contact cof 𝜇 = 0.4 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Stick to Slip Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Stick to Slip back to Stick Second (convex) shape Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Experiment with Ring-like Objects (𝐸, 𝜇, ℎ, 𝜌) shells. Degenerate Type equation here. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Summary Displacement-based grasping strategy for deformable objects. Stable and pure squeezes. Event-driven algorithm combined with contact mode analysis. Energy-based grasp optimality. Computational efficiency from one-time matrix decomposition. Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University Acknowledgement US National Science Foundation IIS-0915876 Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University