Transcript Brief Description  At the end of this module you will have learned the six criteria for evaluating websites.

Brief Description
 At the end of this module you will have learned the six
criteria for evaluating websites.
Objectives
 Students will be able to:
 Understand the six criteria for evaluating websites.
 Compare and contrast the reliability of resources
available on the web.
 Apply an evaluation checklist and reach a conclusion
about the usefulness of a website for research.
 After each criteria a question will be asked, answer it to
the best of your knowledge.
Websites: Fact or Fiction?
 Doing research on the internet? Do you know that
there are more websites that are fictional rather than
are factual? Your job as a student is to try to
distinguish between the two. Ask yourself these simple
questions while doing research on the internet; it’ll
help you learn how to determine between a fictional
and a factual website.
Authorship
 An authoritative website will have a clearly identified
author.
 Things to consider:
 Is the author of the text clearly indicated on the site?
 Is there a way to get in touch with the author?
Question One: Authorship
 If an author isn’t listed on a website should you use it?
 Yes
 No
Sorry
 This in incorrect.
 If the author isn’t clearly indicated on the site, don’t use
it. It’s best to skip over a website when authors aren’t
indicated, even if it looks good. Keep in mind it’s better
to skip over a website that you aren’t sure of than to use
it and let your grade suffer.
Congratulations
 This is correct.
 If the author isn’t clearly indicated on the site, don’t use
it. It’s best to skip over a website when authors aren’t
indicated, even if it looks good. Keep in mind it’s better
to skip over a website that you aren’t sure of than to use
it and let your grade suffer.
Expertise
 An authoritative website will have a knowledgeable
author.
 Things to consider:
 Are the author’s credentials indicated?
 Is the author’s background described?
 What is the author’s degree in?
 Is the author an expert in the field?
Question Two: Expertise
 Should you use a website about diabetes written by a
history professor at the University of Missouri or
should you use a website written by a professor from
Harvard Medical School?
 History Professor
 Harvard Medical Professor
Sorry
 This in incorrect.
 You should always use a website in which the author’s
credentials and educational background match up with
the information they are informing you about.
 Recommendation:

If an author’s credentials are not listed, do a little investigative
research. For example if an author claims to be a history
professor at the University of Missouri go to MU’s employee
directory and check.
Congratulations
 This is correct.
 You should always use a website in which the author’s
credentials and educational background match up with
the information they are informing you about.
 Recommendation:

If an author’s credentials are not listed, do a little investigative
research. For example if an author claims to be a history
professor at the University of Missouri go to MU’s employee
directory and check.
Host
 An authoritative website will be hosted on a legitimate web
server. Analyze the website’s address to see where the site is
hosted. This can include .com, .gov, .edu, and .org.
 .edu

A website ending with .edu is hosted by an educational institution. The
information may be scholarly. Or it could be a student’s work.
 .gov

A website ending with .gov is hosted by a governmental body. The
information may be authoritative and likely biased.
 .org

A website ending with an .org is hosted by an organization or society.
The value of the information contained in the website will depend on
the reputation of the organization or society.
 .com

A website ending with .com is hosted by a commercial organization.
Information found on these sites can be informative as well as biased.
Question Three: Host
 When analyzing a website do you need to consider
where the site is hosted?
 Yes
 No
Sorry
 This in incorrect.
 An authoritative website needs to be hosted on a
legitimate web server. The authoritativeness of a website
is based on it’s host, but you also need to consider the
information found on that website. Does it seem
misinforming or biased?
 Recommendation:

Consider the purpose of each site no matter what the host is;
the purpose of a website will tell you a lot about the type of
information coming your way.
Congratulations
 This is correct.
 An authoritative website needs to be hosted on a
legitimate web server. The authoritativeness of a website
is based on it’s host, but you also need to consider the
information found on that website. Does it seem
misinforming or biased?
 Recommendation:

Consider the purpose of each site no matter what the host is;
the purpose of a website will tell you a lot about the type of
information coming your way.
Currency
 An authoritative website shows signs that someone is
taking care of it on a regular basis.
 Things to consider:
 Is a creation date clearly indicated on the page?
 Is there a date on the page stating when it was last
updated?
 If there are links to other websites, are the links up-todate?
Question Four: Currency
 It’s important to consider ‘dead links’ before using a
certain website.
 True
 False
Sorry
 This is incorrect.
 An authoritative website shows signs that the author is
taking care of it on a regular basis, this includes keeping
linked URLs up-to-date.
 Recommendation:

If one or two links are no longer functioning this is okay, since
websites have the habit of disappearing overnight. However, if
all of the links are no longer functioning it’s time to consider
another website.
Congratulations
 This is correct.
 An authoritative website shows signs that the author is
taking care of it on a regular basis, this includes keeping
linked URLs up-to-date.
 Recommendation:

If one or two links are no longer functioning this is okay, since
websites have the habit of disappearing overnight. However, if
all of the links are no longer functioning it’s time to consider
another website.
Purpose
 An authoritative website will have a clear reason for
existing.
 Things to consider:
 Are the goals of the website clear?
 Are the goals of the author clear?
 Is the website biased?
 Who is the intended audience?
Question Five: Purpose
 When looking at a website is it important to consider
who the intended audience is?
 Yes
 No
Sorry
 This is incorrect.
 When looking at websites, it’s important to consider
who the intended audience is. For example you don’t
want to use a website about the Battle of Gettysburg that
is geared towards students in the third grade. Instead
use one that is geared towards college students and
historians.
 Recommendation:

Pay special attention to this concept. You don’t want to lose
points by using a website not approved by your instructor.
Congratulations
 This is correct.
 When looking at websites, it’s important to consider
who the intended audience is. For example you don’t
want to use a website about the Battle of Gettysburg that
is geared towards students in the third grade. Instead
use one that is geared towards college students and
historians.
 Recommendation:

Pay special attention to this concept. You don’t want to lose
points by using a website not approved by your instructor.
Content
 An authoritative website will be well written and
provide in-depth topic analysis. This means it will be a
well rounded website.
 Things to consider:
 Is the text written in “good” English? There should not




be any spelling mistakes or other errors.
Does the site provide in-depth material?
Is the site carefully focused on a particular topic?
Is the site biased?
Does the site have a bibliography?
Question Six: Content
 When looking at a website should you consider the
importance of a bibliography?
 No
 Yes
Sorry
 This is incorrect.
 When looking at websites it is recommended that you
look closely at the bibliography. The bibliography will
help you check and verify the site and take you to
additional resources.
 Recommendation:

Pay close attention to an author’s bibliography, just because it
looks professional, it doesn’t mean its accurate.
Congratulations
 This is correct.
 When looking at websites it is recommended that you
look closely at the bibliography. The bibliography will
help you check and verify the site and take you to
additional resources.
 Recommendation:

Pay close attention to an author’s bibliography, just because it
looks professional, it doesn’t mean its accurate.
Actual Website
 The next few slide will give you an example of a
complete evaluation using all six evaluation criteria.
Example: Authorship
For our website evaluation example, I’ve chosen to take a closer look at
Evaluation of Alleged Sasquatch Footprints by D. Jeffrey Meldrum
Is the author clearly indicated on the site? The author is clearly indicated
on the website as D. Jeffrey Meldrum. If the author is not listed, do not
use that website.
Another aspect that one needs to consider is the ‘Contact Us Section’;
authoritative and reliable websites should always provide users with a
‘Contact Us Section’. If you find the website questionable and the author
has not provided you with a ‘Contact Us Section’ skip over it and use
another one. Since I find the article interesting enough, I’m going to
continue on with my evaluation process, even though a ‘Contact Us
Section’ is not listed.
Expertise
An authoritative website will have a knowledgeable author. Are the author’s credentials indicated? Is
the author’s educational background described? The answer to both of those questions is no. D.
Jeffrey Meldrum does not list his credentials and/or educational background, automatically this
should send up a red flag. Although D. Jeffery Meldrum does not list his credentials and education
background, I still find his website interesting enough to continue on so my next step will to try and
locate the author on the Idaho State University website. I simply looked up Jeffrey Meldrum, by
accident, instead of D. Jeffrey Meldrum; does this make a difference?
According to ISU, Jeffery teaches in the Department of Biological Sciences, and he is an associate
professor of Anatomy & Anthropology. He’s also is an adjunct associate professor in the department
of Anthropology and Occupational and Physical Therapy. Jeffery has his B.S. and his M.S. in
Zoology and his Ph.D in Anatomical Sciences.
ISU also gives readers a brief biographical sketch; here we are introduced to his studies and some
of his writings, for example, Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science. However, good as this sounds, I still
realized I made a mistake earlier when I was looking up Jeffery. As I stated earlier I looked up Jeffery
Meldrum on ISU’s site instead of the listed author D. Jeffery Meldrum; I was able to locate one page
within ISU’s website on D. Jeffery under the Department of Biological Sciences. The email provided
for D. Jeffery Meldrum is the same for Jeffery Meldrum, so it’s fairly safe to assume they are the
same person.
Host
Evaluation of Alleged Sasquatch Footprints is hosted by an educational
institution; Idaho State University. Number one thing people need to keep in
mind about websites ending with .edu; is that it could be a professor’s
personal studies or a student creating a website for their computer science
class.
Currency
An authoritative website shows signs that someone is taking care of it on a
regular basis. First look too see if there is a creation date indicated.
A brief glance indicates there is no date listed. I always recommend students
to look for creation dates. If they aren’t listed, don’t use the site. The main
reason for this is due to time sensitive material. Health related topics, for
example, need to be current to keep up with the amount of new information
out there. This normally would send up a red flag, however, I’ll give the author
the benefit of the doubt for this evaluation example.
Purpose
An authoritative website will have a clear reason for existing. Are the purpose
and goals clearly indicated within the text? Is it biased? Overall, the purpose
of Evaluation of Alleged Sasquatch Footprints is to introduce readers to a brief
examination of over 100 footprint cases and photographs of Sasquatch. D.
Jeffery’s work doesn’t seem biased in any manner; he just wants to give
readers a brief introduction to the footprints of Sasquatch.
Content
An authoritative website will be well written and provide in-depth topic
analysis. It’s important to consider if the text is written in ‘good’ English, if
there are any spelling mistakes and so forth. Another aspect that I consider
extremely important to consider is the bibliography. When dealing with
information found on the internet, anyone can publish anything, there aren’t
any checks and balances. This is extremely important to consider since
many websites can be plagiarized; when an author provides you with their
resources, double check their work. It is recommended you look at a
website’s resources; look them up in any of the library’s databases to see if
what the author is saying is what others in the same field are saying. This is
also extremely important, since some websites make up their own
bibliography to look good. Since D. Jeffery isn’t listing any of his resources, a
red flag is automatically sent up.
Evaluation Conclusion
In the end, I would most likely never use the Evaluation of Alleged
Sasquatch Footprints for one of my resources, for two really big reasons.
Number one, there is still the question of the author; is the listed D. Jeffery
Meldrum of this website the same as Jeffery Meldrum on ISU’s faculty page,
who is a professor with excellent credentials. Or is this another Jeffery
Meldrum all together. Number two is based on the content; since this
website, reliable or not, does not list its bibliography; I would have to skip
over it entirely. It’s important to keep in mind; authors of websites can easily
be plagiarizing from another individual’s work. Being provided with a
bibliography, is an easy way to check on an author’s works, not only to see if
what they are saying lines up with the authors listed in his work, but also to
double check and make sure the author of that particular website isn’t
plagiarizing from their resources.
Final Conclusion
 There are many details of a website that can help you
decide whether you are looking at a reliable website or
a bad website. The information provided in the
previous slides will help you determine if the website
you are looking at is authoritative or not.