Emily Andersen, CNP AMG Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Objectives  PTLD  Incidence  Risk factors  Presentation  Treatment/Chemotherapy  Prognosis  Anemia and Pancytopenia  Risk.

Download Report

Transcript Emily Andersen, CNP AMG Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Objectives  PTLD  Incidence  Risk factors  Presentation  Treatment/Chemotherapy  Prognosis  Anemia and Pancytopenia  Risk.

Emily Andersen, CNP
AMG Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant
Objectives
 PTLD
 Incidence
 Risk factors
 Presentation
 Treatment/Chemotherapy
 Prognosis
 Anemia and Pancytopenia
 Risk factors/types
 Presentation
 Treatment
Incidence
 Who?
 Patients exposed to systemic immunosuppression
 EBV naïve at highest risk
 More common in heart and lung transplants (10%)
 Second most common malignancy in adult transplant
recipients; most common malignancy in pediatric
transplant recipients
 What?
 Expansion of recipient origin B cells latently infected
with EBV
 May compromise graft function
Parker et al. (2010)
Incidence
 Where?
 HEENT most common, although it can occur anywhere
 May even present in transplanted organ
 When?
 First year most common, but onset and duration are
variable amongst patients
 Why?
 “Impairment of EBV-specific, cytotoxic T-cell function
by systemic immunosuppression”
 Largely EBV-driven – crosses from infection to
Parker et al. (2010)
malignancy
Smith (2010)
5-yr incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Relative risk of NHL:
Heart-lung
239.5
Lung
58.6
Heart
27.6
Liver
29.9
Pancreas
34.9
DD kidney Tx
12.6
Risk Factors
 Transplant type
 Small bowel > Lung > Heart/lung > Heart > Liver > Kidney
 Immunosuppressive regimen
 Cyclosporine vs Tacrolimus
 Intensity of immunosuppression
 Age
 Under 10 and over 60 years of age
Parker et al. (2010)
Approximate Frequency of PTLD in patients by
organ transplanted and age
Organ
Adults (%)
Pediatric (%)
Kidney
1.0 – 2.3
1.2 – 10.1
Liver
1.0 – 2.8
4.0 – 15.0
Heart
1.0 – 6.3
6.4 – 19.5
Heart/Lung
2.4 – 5.8
6.4 – 19.5
Lung
4.2 – 10.0
6.4 – 19.5
Small bowel
20
30
Parker et al. (2010)
Presentation
 Not a “typical” presentation
 Usually no lymphadenopathy
 May or may not have constitutional symptoms
 Presenting symptoms linked to site of involvement



HEENT
GI tract
Bone marrow
Parker et al. (2010)
Diagnosis
 Biopsy
 Surgical excisional biopsy is preferred over core needle
biopsy
 Histopathological evaluation
 Imaging
 Ultrasound
 MRI
 CT scan
 PET scan
Parker et al. (2010)
Treatment/Chemotherapy
 Dependent on many factors
 Age
 Co-morbidities
 Aggressiveness of PTLD
 Treatment
 Reduction in immunosuppression
 Antiviral therapy
 Rituxan
 Rituxan + combination chemotherapy (R-CHOP)
Elstrom et al. (2006)
Parker et al. (2010)
Prognosis
Caillard et al. (2006)
Anemia and Pancytopenia
 Variety of causes/types
 Passenger lymphocyte syndrome
 Drug-induced cytopenias
 Viral infections
Smith (2010)
Passenger Lymphocyte Syndrome
 Caused by ABO-mismatch
 Abrupt onset at 1-3 weeks
 Decreased Hgb, haptoglobin
 Increased LDH, bilirubin
 Positive direct antiglobulin test
 Treatment
 Supportive care
 Self-limiting after ~3 months
Smith (2010)
Drug-induced Cytopenias
 Can be caused by numerous drugs
 Drug not specific to SOT

Bactrim
 Drugs specific to SOT


Antivirals
Immunosuppressants
Smith (2010)
Viral infections
 Opportunistic infections
 Parvovirus B19
 CMV
 Human herpes virus 6
Smith (2010)
Conclusions
 PTLD
 Severity, prognosis, and treatment widely vary
 Biopsy, imaging, and Hematology/Oncology consult
 Rituxan or R-CHOP shown to be effective but have
higher risk of side effects
 Anemia and cytopenias
 Many differentials to consider
 Must identify source to treat appropriately
Case Study
 O.L. – 7o y/o WM 3 months s/p kidney transplant
from deceased donor
 Radiation nephritis (history of lymphoma 1982)
 Transplant complicated by steroid induced psychosis
 Maintained on low-dose Myfortic and Tacrolimus
 Baseline Crt 1.3-1.5
 Neutropenia – Bactrim and Valcyte held
 Presents with tremor, increasing crt, thrombocytopenia,
unintentional weight loss, GI complaints
Case Study
 What further tests would you order?
 What things about his presentation are concerning?
Case Study
 Labs
 CBC




WBC 4.9
Hgb 7.9
Hct 24.6
Plt 37
 BMP
 Na+ 130
 K+ 3.8
 BUN 28
 Crt 2.7
 CMV
 Positive for infection
Case Study
 Imaging
 CT chest/abd/pelvis





Stable mild adenopathy to the mesentary
Mild acute diverticulitis
New right renal transplant
No significant recurrent adenopathy below the diaphragm. No
significant thoracic adenopathy.
Enlarge mediastinal lymph node? Causing extrinsic
compression of esophagus
 Bone marrow biopsy

No evidence of lymphoma
Case Study
 Patient underwent esophageal ultrasound for further
assessment of lymph nodes
 Abnormal mediastinal lymph node discovered
 FN biopsy performed

CD 10 positive B-cell lymphoma
 Kidney biopsy performed to r/o rejection
 Atypical lymphocytic proliferation
Case Study
 What is your differential diagnosis?
 What is the next step?
 What things do you need to consider in deciding on a
treatment plan?
Case Study
 Patient treated with Rituxan 375mg/m2 weekly x 4
weeks
 CHOP not given d/t patient’s health status, co-
morbidities
 Steroids with Rituxan lowered d/t patient’s history of
steroid-induced psychosis
 IV Ganciclovir for CMV infection
 Immunosuppression decreased to low dose Tacrolimus
only (goal level 3-5)
Case Study
 Patient tolerated Rituxan infusions well with the
exception of some transient worsening confusion d/t
steroid pre-meds
 PET scan performed
 Some response and reduction to lymph nodes with
Rituxan
 Some residual hypermetabolism in mediastinal lymph
nodes
 Patient given two options
 Four additional cycles of Rituxan
 Watchful waiting with repeat PET scan in 3-4 months
Case Study
 Repeat PET scan 3 months later
 New bulky adenopathy in the retroperitoneum
 Tacrolimus discontinued and patient started on
everolimus
 Patient had received one dose of Rituxan upon his
return to our clinic
 Patient still not candidate for CHOP therapy
 Decided to proceed with Rituxan/Treanda – received
one cycle and had confusion d/t steroids

Patient/family decided to hold off on more treatment
Case Study
 Repeat PET scan 3 months later
 Complete resolution of lymphoma in the chest
 Marked improvement in the lymphadenopathy in the
retroperitoneum
 Continued with watchful waiting
 Repeat PET scan 3 months later
 Aggressive recurrence with large mass in the chest and
worsening disease in the retroperitoneum
 Patient decided against further treatment and opted
for comfort cares/hospice
References
 Elstrom, R.L., Andreadis, C., Aqui, N.A., Ahya, V.N., Bloom,
R.D., Brozena, S.C., . . . Tsai, D.E. (2006). Treatment of
PTLD with Rituximab or Chemotherapy. American Journal
of Transplantation, 6, 569-576.
 Parker, A., Bowles, K., Bradley, J.A., Emery, V.,
Featherstone, C., Gupte, G., . . . Newstead, C. (2010).
Diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
in solid organ transplant recipients – BCHS and BTS
Guidelines. British Journal of Hematology, 149, 675-692.
 Smith, E. (2010). Hematologic disorders after solid organ
transplant. American Society of Hematology, 281-286.