Active and hibernating turbulence in channel flow of Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids Li Xi and Michael D.
Download ReportTranscript Active and hibernating turbulence in channel flow of Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids Li Xi and Michael D.
Active and hibernating turbulence in channel flow of Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids Li Xi and Michael D. Graham University of Wisconsin-Madison Abstract Channel flow: near-wall structure Re=3600 Wi=0 (Newtonian) Hibernating (only bottom half shown) Minimal spanwise size vs. Wi Wi = 80, b=0.97, Ex=103 57% DR Virk, P. S., AIChE J. 1975 Simulations in minimal flow units MDR (maximum drag reduction): insensitive to polymer-related properties. FENE-P dumbbell model b = maximum extensibility Maximum drag reduction Newtonian 38% DR 55%-69% DR Virk, P. S., AIChE J. 1975 Warholic, M. D. et al. Exp. Fluids, 1999 • Minimal periodic box that sustains turbulence. • Isolates the dynamics of individual coherent structures. • Applied in Newtonian flow by Jiménez and Moin (J. Fluid Mech., 1991), and Hamilton, Kim and Waleffe (J. Fluid Mech., 1995) Time scale for convection of momentum • Universal mean velocity profile: the Virk profile • Features of structure in MDR regime: • Reynolds shear stress is greatly reduced across the channel, • Weak streaks and streamwise vortices • Weak streamwise dependence • Spatiotemporal intermittency Time scale for diffusion of momentum Time scale for polymer relaxation Time scale for polymer deformation Solvent shear viscosity Top wall Time series of mean velocity and wall shear rate Re=3600 Wi=0 Bottom wall Experiments Active and hibernating turbulence Top wall • Red: constant vortex strength Q. • Green: constant vx. • What sustains turbulence at MDR? • Why is there an upper limit of DR? • Why is MDR universal (w.r.t. polymer properties)? • What causes the completely different turbulent spatiotemporal dynamics in the MDR regime? • Can we achieve high drag reduction without polymer via active control? Near laminar-turbulence transition. Mean flow rate vs. Wi Active Drag reduction by polymers-phenomena Schematic Flow structure in hibernation Selected snapshots during a hibernation period (Wi=29): Wi=29 b=0.97 Ex=103 Bottom wall Turbulent channel flow of drag-reducing polymer solutions is simulated in minimal flow geometries. Even in the Newtonian limit, we find intervals of “hibernating” turbulence that display many features of the universal maximum drag reduction (MDR) asymptote observed in polymer solutions: weak streamwise vortices, nearly nonexistent streamwise variations and a mean velocity gradient that quantitatively matches experiments. As viscoelasticity increases, the frequency of these intervals also increases, while the intervals themselves are unchanged, leading to flows that increasingly resemble MDR. MFU results: overview Observation: Normal “active” turbulence is punctuated by long periods of low wall shear rate accompanied by increasing mean velocity and followed by a burst in shear rate • “Hibernation” • Found in both Newtonian and viscoelastic flows • Quantifiable with identification criteria: Hibernation: • Very weak vortices and streaks, • Very weak streamwise dependence, • “Near-Virk” mean velocity profile -- even in Newtonian flow! Hypothesis 1: on intermittency and MDR Polymer stretches Active turbulence: substantial stretching of polymer molecules New turbulent fluctuations grow, destabilizing hibernation and generating active turbulence Prediction: hibernation dominates as MDR is approached. Hibernating flow: weak vortices, Reynolds stresses and streamwise waviness. Polymers relax. Polymer stretching suppresses active turbulence and causes hibernation. Increased Frequency as Wi ↑. Polymer relaxes Times scales of hibernation As Wi increases: • Lifetime of active turbulence is reduced. • Duration of hibernation is almost invariant. • Hibernation takes a larger fraction of time. average duration of active turbulence Hypothesis 2: hibernation is a saddle point Exact coherent states (ECS) in plane Couette flow fraction of time taken by hibernation Upper branch ? average duration of hibernation Lower branch: very weak streamwise dependence Waleffe, F., Phys. Fluids, 2003 Total shear viscosity Polymer extensional viscosity Solvent extensional viscosity Viscoelasticity compresses the lifetime of active turbulence intervals while having little effect on hibernation itself. Acknowledgments Fabian Waleffe, John Gibson, NSF-CBET