A Journey Together: New Maryland Healthcare Landscape Western Maryland Forum Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 2015
Download ReportTranscript A Journey Together: New Maryland Healthcare Landscape Western Maryland Forum Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 2015
A Journey Together: New Maryland Healthcare Landscape Western Maryland Forum Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission April 2015 Health Reform March 23, 2010 Health Reform is much more than the Exchanges November 1, 2013 The Context: Health Care System Challenges High costs Workforce shortages Coverage & Access Fragmentation and variation Health care disparities Aging and sicker population More Challenges Ahead Changes in Demographics and Expenditures Age 65 plus 2010 40 million 2020 55 million 2030 72 million Federal Budget & Health Care Spending More Entitlements, Fewer Contributors Higher Cost Without Better Outcomes US spending growth outpaces other developed countries and spending is a higher portion of GDP 18 8,000 United States Canada Germany France Australia United Kingdom 7,000 6,000 16 14 12 5,000 10 4,000 8 * PPP=Purchasing Power Parity. Data: OECD Health Data 2011 (database), Version 6/2011. Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011. 2008 2006 2004 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 2008 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 0 1988 0 1986 2 1984 1,000 1982 4 1980 2,000 2002 United States France Germany Canada United Kingdom Australia 6 2000 3,000 15% of Medicare Beneficiaries have 6 or more chronic conditions—1/2 of cost 35 National Allegany Anne Arundel Baltimore Baltimore City Calvert Caroline Carroll Cecil Charles Dorchester Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Prince Georges Queen Annes Somerset St. Marys Talbot Washington Wicomico Worcester State 40 27% of Medicare Beneficiaries Have Diabetes—Even More Prevalent in MD National Average State Average 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 70 National Allegany Anne Arundel Baltimore Baltimore City Calvert Caroline Carroll Cecil Charles Dorchester Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Prince Georges Queen Annes Somerset St. Marys Talbot Washington Wicomico Worcester State 45% of Medicare Beneficiaries Have High Cholesterol --More Prevalent in MD National Average State Average 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 80 National Allegany Anne Arundel Baltimore Baltimore City Calvert Caroline Carroll Cecil Charles Dorchester Frederick Garrett Harford Howard Kent Montgomery Prince Georges Queen Annes Somerset St. Marys Talbot Washington Wicomico Worcester State 55% of Medicare Beneficiaries Have High Blood Pressure— More Prevalent in MD National Average 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 New Paradigm • Improve the health of the population; • Enhance the patient experience of care; • Reduce the per capita cost of care. In Response, a New Culture for Patient Care is Emerging Year 1 •Shift to consumer-centric model •Improve care transitions •Payment reform Year 2 • Modernize services to match new model • Partner across hospitals, physicians, and other providers and communities to develop new consumer centered approaches Year 3 • Improve care coordination and improve chronic care • Work with people to keep them healthier, financially and clinically • Engage communities Implications • All this means: – Payment moves away from fee-for service • The more you do the more you get paid 12 Implications • All this means: – Payment moves away from fee-for service • The more you do the more you get paid • The better you do the better you get paid – Pressure to assume more risk – Need for integration and collaboration • CHANGE IS HERE – CHANGE IS EVERYWHERE 13 Maryland Hospitals are Paid Differently • Maryland has set hospital rates since the mid1970s – Health Services Cost Review Commission • Independent 7 member Commission • Public utility model • Provides oversight and regulation of hospitals • Maryland hospitals are waived from Federal Medicare payment methods (the Medicare waiver) • All payers participate • Unique in the country 14 Value of the All Payer System Helped hold down costs relative to elsewhere Funds access to care Transparency Leader in linking quality and payment Local access to regulators New Federal Agreement • 5 year demonstration with Medicare (CMS) – Effective 1/1/14 • Focus on holding down costs • More rewards for improving outcomes • Encourages better team work among whole health care system Implications for Patients and their Families • Quality safety and satisfaction scores can account for a significant amount of revenue – Requires hospitals to become more patient and family centered • Expect greater care coordination – Improved transitions of care between settings • e.g., clear instructions for patients on discharge • Expect more outreach from providers – Particularly true for those with chronic illnesses • Movement of care to the most appropriate setting – Right care, right time, right place, right price 17 Model Has Been Tested Maryland • Maryland has been testing the Model across the State for 4 Years: – Better quality – Reduced Costs – Reasonable Profitability • Examples of Collaboration – School Health Program Collaboration – Nursing Home Collaboration 18 Concluding Thoughts • New waiver is a call to action • HSCRC is a State entity that represents the public – Ensure rates and costs are reasonable – Promote the Triple Aim for patients and purchasers of care • Creates a path for change – Less disruptive than elsewhere – Proactive not reactive • Value is the new gold standard – – – – – Quality Appropriate hospital care New Partnerships Cost efficiency Population health focus 19 THANK YOU ! 20