Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/ritonavir versus Lopinavir/ritonavir in ARV Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients at Week 48: ARTEMIS (TMC114-C211) DeJesus E, Ortiz R, Khanlou H, Voronin.
Download ReportTranscript Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/ritonavir versus Lopinavir/ritonavir in ARV Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients at Week 48: ARTEMIS (TMC114-C211) DeJesus E, Ortiz R, Khanlou H, Voronin.
Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/ritonavir versus Lopinavir/ritonavir in ARV Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Patients at Week 48: ARTEMIS (TMC114-C211) DeJesus E, Ortiz R, Khanlou H, Voronin E, Van Lunzen J, Andrade-Villanueva J, Fourie J, De Meyer S, Haley M, Lefebvre E, Vanden Abeele C, Spinosa-Guzman S ARTEMIS: Phase III study design 689 ARV-naïve patients VL>5,000; no CD4 entry DRV/r 800/100mg qd + TDF 300 mg and FTC 200 mg (N=343) LPV/r 400/100mg bid or 800/200mg qd + TDF 300 mg and FTC 200 mg (N=346) LPV dosing LPV formulation qd = 15% Capsule only = bid = 77% Tablet only = bid/qd = 7% 15% 2% Capsule/tablet switch = 83% Dosing was based on regulatory approval; switch was made according to local regulatory approval and drug availability ARTEMIS: Study objectives • Primary end point – Proportion of patients with an HIV RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 48 • Primary objective – demonstrate non-inferiority of DRV/r qd vs LPV/r based on that primary end point • Secondary objectives – evaluate long-term safety, tolerability and durability of virologic responses – compare immunologic responses – conduct pharmacokinetic evaluations ARTEMIS: Baseline characteristics DRV/r qd (N=343) LPV/r qd or bid (N=346) 104 (30) 105 (30) 36 (9) 35 (9) 40/23/23 44/21/22 70,800 (835–5,580,000) 62,100 (667–4,580,000) 228 (4–750) 218 (2–714) 43 (13) 48 (14) Baseline demographics Female, N (%) Mean (±SD) age (yrs) Caucasian/Black/Hispanic, % Baseline disease characteristics Median HIV-1 RNA (cpm) (range) Median CD4 (cells/mm3 [range]) HBV/HCV co-infected, n (%) Stratification factors at screening CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 40% 41% Plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥100,000 cpm 36% 36% ARTEMIS: Patient disposition Incidence (%) Discontinuation DRV/r qd (N=343) LPV/r qd or bid (N=346) 41 (12%) 56 (16%) AE* 12 (3%) 24 (7%) Lost to follow-up 14 (4%) 10 (3%) Withdrawal of consent 4 (1%) 5 (1%) Virologic failure 2 (<1%) 6 (2%) Pregnancy 5 (1%) 3 (<1%) Non-compliance 2 (<1%) 5 (1%) Other 2 (<1%) 3 (<1%) *Four deaths (1 in DRV/r group; 3 in LPV/r group) Table includes all data up to the point when the last patient reached week 48 Mean exposure was 56 weeks (range 0–83 weeks) Patients with VL <50 copies/mL (% [±SE]) ARTEMIS: Viral load <50 copies/mL to Week 48 (ITT-TLOVR) 100 DRV/r qd (N=343) LPV/r qd or bid (N=346) 90 84% 78% 80 70 60 50 40 Estimated difference in response vs LPV/r for non-inferiority: PP = 5.6% (95% CI –0.1;11.3) p<0.001 Estimated difference in response vs LPV/r for superiority: ITT = 5.5% (95% CI –0.3;11.2) p=0.062 30 20 10 0 2 4 8 12 16 24 Time (weeks) 36 48 ARTEMIS: Confirmed response by baseline VL or CD4 at Week 48 (ITT-TLOVR) DRV/r qd 100 †p<0.05 86 80 vs LPV/r 85 n=194 n=191 n=28 79† 67 60 40 20 Patients with VL <50 copies/mL (%) Patients with VL <50 copies/mL (%) 100 LPV/r qd or bid 87 80 84 80 77 71 67 60 40 20 0 0 <100,000 ≥100,000 0 226 226 †Chi 117 square analysis 120 50–200 >200 Baseline CD4 cell count (cells/mm3) Baseline viral load (copies/mL) N= <50 N= 30 30 111 118 202 198 ARTEMIS: Responses by LPV/r dosing schedule Patients with VL <50 copies/mL (%) 100 78 80 84 81 71 60 40 20 0 N= LPV/r LPV/r* bid 346 267 LPV/r* qd 52 DRV/r qd 343 *27 patients receiving LPV/r bid and qd during the study were excluded from this analysis ARTEMIS: Median change in absolute CD4 cell count to Week 48 (ITT-NC=F) Median change in CD4 cell count from baseline (cells/mm3) 150 141 cells/mm3 137 cells/mm3 120 DRV/r qd (N=343) LPV/r qd or bid (N=346) 90 60 30 0 2 4 8 12 16 24 Time (weeks) 36 48 ARTEMIS: Virologic failure (VF) and emergence of mutations DRV/r qd LPV/r qd or bid (N=343) (N=346) VF (> 50 cpm) 34 (10%) 49 (14%) VF (> 400 cpm) 11 (3%) 18 (5%) Paired baseline and VF genotype available 10 18 0 1* 1† 2† IAS-USA PI RAMS IAS-USA NRTI mutations VF by TLOVR † 184V *A71T, V77I *IAS-USA mutations, Fall 2006; Johnson et al. Topics in HIV Medicine. 2006; 14:125-130 ARTEMIS: Grade 2–4 adverse events DRV/r qd LPV/r qd or bid (N=343) (N=346) GI (all AEs) 23 (7) 47 (14) p<0.01 Diarrhea 14 (4) 34 (10) p<0.05 Nausea 6 (2) 10 (3) 9 (3) 4 (1) Gr 2–4 AEs† ≥2% incidence, n (%) Rash (all types) †At least possibly related to study drug, excluding laboratory-related events • No renal SAEs and no treatment discontinuations due to renal AEs ARTEMIS: Grade 2–4 laboratory abnormalities Grade 2–4 laboratory abnormalities ≥2% incidence, n (%) DRV/r qd (N=343) LPV/r qd or bid (N=346) Alanine aminotransferase 29 (8) 35 (10) Aspartate aminotransferase 32 (9) 31 (9) Hyperglycemia 22 (6) 23 (7) Pancreatic amylase 23 (7) 17 (5) Pancreatic lipase 6 (2) 6 (2) Total cholesterol 44 (13) 78 (23) Low-density lipoprotein 44 (13) 36 (11) Triglycerides 10 (3) 38 (11) No significant changes in calculated creatinine clearance between baseline and Week 48 visits ARTEMIS: Mean fasting lipid levels over time mM ng/mL Mean triglycerides DRV/r qd (n=343) LPV/r qd or bid (n=346) 250 2.9 2.3 200 1.7 150 1.1 100 2 4 8 12 16 24 36 Time (weeks) DRV/r n= 343 LPV/r n= 346 320 313 = NCEP cut-off Total cholesterol/HDL ratio 3.5 Mean total cholesterol/HDL ratio (± SE) Mean triglyceride concentration ( ± SE) 300 5.5 DRV/r qd (n=343) LPV/r qd or bid (n=346) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2 4 8 12 16 48 306 301 343 346 24 320 313 36 48 305 301 ARTEMIS: DRV plasma concentrations for DRV/r 800mg/100mg DRV plasma conc (ng/mL) 10,000 1,000 100 EC50 = 55 ng/mL for wild-type virus (adjusted for protein binding) 10 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Ctrough 36 Time post-dose (hours) PK substudy – week 4 data (mean ± SD; N=9) Population PK study (median, IQR, range; N=335) ARTEMIS: Conclusions • The use of once-daily DRV/r 800/100mg + TDF/FTC in treatment-naïve patients: – resulted in excellent virologic and immunologic responses – provided suitable exposure in all patients – was well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile • In comparison to the LPV/r arm* in treatment-naïve patients: – For efficacy, DRV/r 800/100mg qd was non-inferior in the overall population, and superior in patients with high VL – DRV/r had lower incidence of common GI toxicities and triglyceride elevations *LPV/r arm included: LPV/r 400/100mg bid or 800/200mg qd, capsule and tablet formulations ARTEMIS: Acknowledgments • The patients and their families for their participation and support during the study • TMC114-C211 study team and the investigators and co-investigators: Argentina: Waldo Belloso, Liiana Calanni, Lidia Cassetti, Luisa De Wouters, Marcelo Losso Australia: Mark Bloch, David Cooper, Dominic Dwyer, Robert Finlayson, Julian Gold, Mark Kelly, Cassy Workman Austria: Armin Rieger and Norbert Vetter Belgium: Nathan Clumeck, Jean-Christophe Goffard, Beatrjs Van der Gucht, Eric Van Wijngaerden Canada: Joss Dewet, Don Kilby, Patrice Junod, Chris Tsoukas, Sharon Walmsley Chile: Juan Ballesteros, Rebeca Northland Costa Rica: Gisela Herrera, Iris Perez Denmark: Jan Gerstoft, Lars Mathiesen, Henrik Nielsen France: Micelle Bentata, Laurent Cotte, Pierre Dellamonica, Pierre-Marie Girard, Christine Katlama, Thierry Prazuck, Dominique Salmon, Patrick Yeni Germany: Keikawus Arasteh, Gerd Fätkenheuer, FrankDetlef Goebel, Thomas Harrer, Hans Jaeger, Joerg-Andres Rump, Dieter Schuster, Albrecht Stoehr, Jan Van Lunzen Greece: George Chrysos Guatemala: Eduardo Arathoon, Carlos Mejia-Villatoro Italy: Adriano Lazzarin, Anna Maria Orani Malaysia: Christopher Lee Mexico: Jaime Andrade-Villanueva, Gustavo Reyes-Teran, Juan Sierra-Madero, Angelina Villasis-Keever Panama: Amalio Rodriguez, Nestor Sosa Puerto Rico: Javier Morales Ramirez, Carmen ZorrillaMaldonado Russia: Natalia Dushkina, Oleg Kozyrev, Valeriy Kulagin, Alexander Pronin, Vladimir Rafalsky, Oleg Romanenko, Elena Vinogradova, Evgeniy Voronin, Alexey Yakovlev Singapore: Lian Lim Poh South Africa: Ezio Baraldi, Jan Fourie, Prudence Ive, Lerato Mohapi, Jennifer Pitt Spain: Buenaventura Clotet, Pere Domingo Switzerland: Milos Opravil Taiwan: Jen-Hsien Wang, Su Pen Yang Thailand: Ploenchan Chetchotisakd, Winai Ratanasuwan, Kiat Ruxrungtham, Khuanchai Supparatpinyo United Kingdom: Martin Fisher, Mark Nelson, Chloe Orkin, Jonathan Weber United States: Ben Barnett, Alfred Burnside, Thomas Campbell, Philippe Chiliade, Amy Colson, Edwin DeJesus, Richard Elion, Walford Fessel, Lucia Flamm, Dushyantha Jayaweera, Peter Kadlecik, Homayoon Khanlou, Lucia Martinez, David McDonough, Anthony Mills, Karam Mounzer, Robert Myers, Jeffrey Nadler, Brian Onbirbak, Roberto Ortiz, Kristen Patterson, Daniel Pearce, Gerald Pierone, Jayashree Ravishankar, Afsoon Roberts, Barry Rodwick, Stefan Schneider, Michael Sension, Paul Skolnik, Aimee Wilkin, Michael Wohlfeiler, Bienvenido Yangco Supported by Tibotec