APB research into Improving the Audit Report Responses to “Promoting Audit Quality” Auditing profession appeared comfortable with current approach User groups expressed concerns: – Overly legalistic.
Download
Report
Transcript APB research into Improving the Audit Report Responses to “Promoting Audit Quality” Auditing profession appeared comfortable with current approach User groups expressed concerns: – Overly legalistic.
APB research into
Improving the Audit Report
Responses to “Promoting
Audit Quality”
Auditing profession appeared comfortable
with current approach
User groups expressed concerns:
– Overly legalistic – too many caveats
– Opinion should appear earlier
– Should be more informative regarding
Estimates
Judgments
Sufficiency of evidence
Uncertainties
APB’s response (1)
THE
AUDITORS
REPORT:
A TIME
FOR
CHANGE?
DECEMBER 2007
The Auditor’s Report: A
Time for Change?
Explained the evolution of the current
report
Described ‘the changing scene’
Offered a number of alternative
reports to help stimulate debate
Alternative Reports
Example 1: Fully compliant with ISA
700 (Revised)
Example 2: ISA 700 (Revised) “Lite”
Example 3: Minimum report that
complies with CA 2006
Feedback on The Auditors Report :
A Time for Change
Views varied by Stakeholder Group
Institutional Investors
– audit reports should be more informative
– favoured reduction in current ‘boiler plate’
Companies
– favoured reduction in the ‘boiler plate’
– did not support added ‘narrative’
Auditors
– wanted to achieve compliance with ISAs
– wanted to retain ‘Bannerman’
– many, but not all, wanted to maintain the status quo
APB’s response (2)
THE
AUDITORS
REPORT:
ISA
A TIME
REVISED
(UK &
IRELAND) 700
FOR
CHANGE?
DECEMBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2008
APB’s Response (2)
Facilitate shortened versions of auditor’s report (Example 2)
by including ‘boilerplate’ wording on auditor responsibilities
and scope of audit on APB website.
Prepare changes to ISA (UK & Ireland) 700 to allow cross
reference to APB website and still be compliant with ISA 700
Prepare other changes to auditor’s report to
– Reflect CA 2006
– State compliance with APB Ethical Standards
– Separate the true and fair view opinion from other legal
responsibilities (the 2 part report)
Initiate research into what additional ‘narrative’ information
should be included