The Smarter Balanced Assessment Framework ~&~ Instructional Implications Adam Ebrahim 8th ELA/HUM & TECH NEA Ambassador to the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.

Download Report

Transcript The Smarter Balanced Assessment Framework ~&~ Instructional Implications Adam Ebrahim 8th ELA/HUM & TECH NEA Ambassador to the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium.

The Smarter Balanced Assessment Framework ~&~ Instructional Implications

Adam Ebrahim 8 th ELA/HUM & TECH NEA Ambassador to the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium

AGENDA

1. Introduction………………………………………….

5m

2. SBAC Construction………………………………

15m

3. Group Task……………………………………...…..

25m

4. Gallery Walk………………………………………..

10m

5. Reflection……………………………………………..

5m

GOALS/PRE-ASSESSMENT

1. Develop a working understanding of how the CCSS are assessed in the Smarter Balanced Framework – SBAC Blueprints – SBAC Literacy Content Specifications (Appendix B) 2. Apply understanding by creating a rich classroom learning experience and formative assessment 3. SBAC, CCSS, & Teachers as advocates

SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS IN CALIFORNIA ***Interim assessment administration not yet determined ***Interim assessments can be comprehensive or partial in target coverage SBAC Interim SBAC Interim SBAC Summative Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4

Handout reference CCSS

WHAT IS BEING ASSESSED?

***Interim assessment administration not yet determined ***Interim assessments can be comprehensive or partial in target coverage CAT-Claim 1: Reading 14 Targets CAT-Claim 2: Writing 5 Targets SBAC Comprehensive Assessment CAT-Claim 3: Speaking/Listening 1 Target SBAC Assesses Targets. Targets are either single standards or clusters of standards CAT-Claim 4: Research Perf. Task-Claim 2 + Claim 4 3 Targets 8 Targets

Handout reference

TARGET DECONSTRUCTION

Claim 1…………………… Reading Content Category……..

Literary Target 7…………………..

Language Use 6 th grade “Interpret figurative language use (e.g., personification, metaphor), literary devices, or connotative meanings of words and phrases used in context and the impact of those word choices on meaning or tone.” (SBAC) RL 1: RL-4: L-5: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the impact of a specific word choice on meaning and tone. Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in word meanings.

• • • •

ACTIVITY

Resources: Two poems, one concept, Literacy Content Spec (Appendix B) for Claim 1, Target 7 Objective: and target Design a formative assessment that incorporates given concept, content, AND… a learning experience that is worthy, multimodal, and aligned to Claim 1, Target 7 THEN… Write an explanation of how the experience and assessment are aligned

Hypothetical timeline 1-3 days

GALLERY WALK

▪ Rotate clockwise, leave one behind to explain and answer questions ▪ Rotate clockwise, leave new person behind to explain and answer questions (You’ll be losing a member of your original group and picking up a new person at each station) ▪ Repeat until 5 minutes remain

• • •

CLOSING

Did this training clarify the relationship between the CCSS and Smarter Balanced assessments?

----If not, how could I make things more clear?

Did this training clarify the relationship between the Smarter Balanced assessment framework and instruction?

----If not, how could I make things more clear?

▪ ▪ Extension Resources [email protected]

SBAC Blueprints: http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Smarter-Balanced-Preliminary-Test Blueprints.pdf

▪ ▪ Appendix B: http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/ELA-Literacy-Content-Specifications.pdf

Item Specifications: http://www.smarterbalanced.org/smarter-balanced-assessments/ (Scroll to bottom, look for .zip files)