MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson Recap • Aim is to understand if MICE has any chance of measuring more subtle effects (such.
Download ReportTranscript MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson Recap • Aim is to understand if MICE has any chance of measuring more subtle effects (such.
MICE pencil beam raster scan simulation study Andreas Jansson Recap • Aim is to understand if MICE has any chance of measuring more subtle effects (such as effects of scattering tails) in addition to the 10% cooling increment. • Method: send zero emittance “probe beams” with various initial offsets to see how their distributions evolve. 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 2 Initial Angular Offset y px 0.15 0.15 py 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 y 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 py px 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 py px 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.15 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 y 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.15 3/11/2009 0.05 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 3 Initial Position Offset (w/o ang. mom.) y px 0.15 0.15 py 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 y 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 py px 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 py px 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.15 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 y 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.15 3/11/2009 0.05 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 4 Angular momentum • Spectrometer solenoid field B=-3.96T x • Bρ=0.667 Tm y. (p=200MeV/c) • θ/r=2.97 mrad/mm z B dA 0 – x=1mm -> y’= 2.97mrad – y=1mm -> x’=-2.97mrad 0 r 2 B0 2 r Br ( z )dz 0 0 r B0 Br ( z )dz 2 (r ) B 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting r B0 2 B A. Jansson 5 Initial Position Offset (w. ang. mom.) y px 0.15 0.15 py 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 y 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 py px 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 py px 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.15 x 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 y 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.15 3/11/2009 0.05 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 6 Pz vs t Initial: dx=40mm dy’=0.120 Initial: dx’=0.100 pz 200 pz 200 Initial: dx’=0.300 195 Initial: dx=120mm dy’=0.360 195 190 190 185 185 180 180 175 175 170 35.0 t 35.5 36.0 36.5 37.0 170 35.0 t 35.5 36.0 36.5 37.0 NB. x’=px/pz, initial ptot (not pz) constant. 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 7 Ptot vs t ptot 200 ptot 200 Initial: dx’=0.300 195 195 190 190 185 185 180 35.0 t 35.5 36.0 36.5 37.0 180 35.0 Initial: dx=120mm dy’=0.360 t 35.5 36.0 36.5 37.0 NB. x’=px/pz, initial ptot (not pz) constant. 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 8 Pz vs t (const. initial pz) pz 200 Initial: dx’=0.400 pz 200 Initial: dx=100mm dy’=0.300 195 195 190 190 185 185 180 35.0 3/11/2009 35.5 36.0 36.5 37.0 t 180 35.0 t 35.5 MICE analysis meeting 36.0 36.5 37.0 A. Jansson 9 Effect of RF phase Const Ptot Pz P tot GeV 0.22 0.21 0.21 t ns 37.0 30º 36.5 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 x cm 0 Const Pz t Ptot P z GeV 0.22 2 4 6 8 10 12 45º 60º 90º 36.0 35.5 x cm 0 2 P z GeV 0.22 P tot GeV 0.22 0.21 0.21 4 6 8 10 x cm 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 t ns 37.0 36.5 0.20 0.20 36.0 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 35.5 x cm 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 x cm 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 x cm 0 NB. Peak gradient adjusted for constant accelerating gradient. 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 10 Effect on transverse plane X' 0.10 X' 0.10 0.05 0.05 X 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.10 X 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 Const Ptot 3/11/2009 0.05 0.10 Const Pz MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 11 Emittance out vs initial angle 10 44 8. 10 45 6. 10 45 4. 10 45 2. 10 45 Eout 1. 0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Xpin m Emittance out for zero initial Emittance, as a function of initial Angle. 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting Results from MuScat M Ellis et al, AIP Conf. Proc. Vol. 896, pp. 168-177 A. Jansson 12 Summary • In general, significant dependence of longitudinal dynamics on transverse amplitude – For angles > ~50mrad and positions > ~5cm • For 90º RF phase, an initial sample selected with fixed Pz comes out with Pz (but not t) approximately independent of transverse amplitude. – Could be useful in trying to select an “uncoupled sample” for analysis (but MICE does not measure Pz very well) • Emittance out depends strongly on angle in for angles > ~50mrad. – This corresponds roughly to the tails of the H2 scattering distribution. • Unlikely that MICE can resolve any effect of the scattering tails (as measured in MuScat). – This is a hunch, not a proof. 3/11/2009 MICE analysis meeting A. Jansson 13