Transcript Background of Performance Measures • 1999-2000 identified 12 Performance Measures • Baseline data collected in 1999-00 • Performance Funding in 2000-01 • Results reported annually in.

Background of
Performance Measures
• 1999-2000 identified 12 Performance
Measures
• Baseline data collected in 1999-00
• Performance Funding in 2000-01
• Results reported annually in the NCCCS
Critical Success Factors report
12 Performance Measures
from 1999-2000 until 2007
1. Progress of Basic Skills
2. Passing Rates on Licensure and
Certification Examinations by First Time
Test Taker
3. Goal Completion of Program Completers
and Non Completers (discontinued)
4. Employment Status of Graduates
(discontinued)
--»
12 Performance Measures
from 1999-2000 until 2007
5. Performance of College Transfer Students
6. Passing Rates of Students in
Developmental Courses
7. Success Rates of Developmental Students
in Subsequent College-Level Courses
8. Satisfaction of Program Completers and
Non-Completers with Programs and
Service of the College
--»
12 Performance Measures
from 1999-2000 until 2007
9. Curriculum Student Retention and
Graduation
10. Employer Satisfaction with Graduates
(discontinued)
11. Client Satisfaction with Customized
Training
12. Program Enrollment (discontinued)
New Performance Measures 2007-08
(approved in August, 2007 and effective immediately)
1. Progress of Basic
Skills
2. Pass Rates on
Licensure/Cert.
3. Performance of
College Transfer
4. Passing Rates in
Developmental
5. Success Rate of Dev. in
Subsequent CollegeLevel
6. Student Satisfaction of
Completers/Non7. Curr. Student
Retention, Transfer &
Graduation
8. Business/Industry
Satisfaction w/ Services
New Performance Measures-Criteria & CFCC’s Performance
√ 1. Progress of Basic Skills
Students
• Standard: 75% of all adult literacy students
are expected to progress within a level,
complete a level or advance to next level.
CFCC:
2006=78%
2007=79%
2008=77%
2009=77%
2. Passing Rates on Licensure and
Certification Examinations by First Time
Test Takers
• To meet the minimum standard must have 80%
aggregate institutional passing rate
CFCC: 91% in 2006 & 92% in 2007; 93% in 2008;
93% in 2009
• BUT… to qualify for PERFORMANCE
FUNDING MUST ALSO have a minimum of
70% passing rate on any single reported exam.
CFCC: met in 2006, missed 1 test in 2007; met in
2008; met in 2009
ACTION PLAN DEVELOPED FOR 2007
3. Performance of College Transfers
• To meet the minimum standard 83% of transfers
will have a 2.0 gpa or higher after two semesters
at a 4-year college
but, to qualify for PERFORMANCE FUNDING must meet below-
• The % of transfer students with a 2.0 gpa or higher
after two semesters at a 4-year will equal or
exceed the percentage of native students.
Continued
• 2006 Standard = 86.8% CFCC = 81.1%
• 2007 Standard = 86.2% CFCC = 80.4%: 76.6%>24 sem hrs; 83.6%- Assoc. Degree recipients
• 2008 Standard = 87% CFCC = 84% (84% & 85%)
• 2009 Standard = 87% CFCC = 86% (86% & 86%)
4. Passing Rates of Students in
Developmental Courses
• Standard: 75% of students completing a
developmental course will earn a “C” or better.
CFCC:
2006-63% (Math-60%, English-67%)
2007-64% (Math-64%, English-63%)
2008-CIS Issue, standard waived for CFCC
2009-80% (Math-83%, English-76%)
√ 5.
Success Rates of Developmental Students in
Subsequent College-Level Courses
Standard: There will be no statistically significant
difference in the performance of developmental
students as compared to the performance of
students not required to take developmental
courses.
CFCC: Met in 2006 for Yr 04-05.
*In 2007 NCCCS hadn’t developed the
programming needed to collect data, so 20
schools didn’t meet the standard
2008-CIS Issue, standard waived for CFCC +4
*Source: Keith Brown, NCCCS
• Standard for 2009- 80% of students who
completed a developmental course in 2006-07 and
completed subsequent college level course in
2007-08 will have a passing grade for the college
level course.
CFCC:
2009=81% (Math-86%; English-79%)
√ 6. Student Satisfaction of
Completers & Non-Completers
• Standard: 90% Satisfaction Rate
CFCC:
2006 = 96%
2007 = 98%
2008 = 97%
2009 = 97%
√ 7. Curriculum Student
Retention, Transfer &
Graduation
• Standard: 65% of the fall cohort will
complete a curriculum program, still be
enrolled, or transfer to another college by
the following fall.
CFCC:
2005 = 70%
2006 = 63%
2007 = 65%
2008 = 70%
2009 = 73%
√ 8. Business/Industry
Satisfaction with Services
Provided
• Standard: 90% of the businesses/industries
surveyed will report satisfaction with CFCC
services.
CFCC:
2006 = 100%
2007 = 99%
2008 = 93%
2009 = 94%
NCCCS Results
• 2006-2007, 39 colleges achieved the “Superior”
ranking and received Performance Funding
• 2007-2008, 7 colleges achieved the “Exceptional”
ranking and received Performance Funding
• 2008-2009, 11 colleges received “Recognition of
Exceptional Institutional Performance”
ACTION PLAN
Problem:
Possible causes for the problem:
State our objective (at a minimum the objective will be to meet the standard):
Specify strategies/procedures we plan to implement for reaching our objective:
Specify the expected outcomes/criteria for success (with outcome to at least meet/exceed the standard):
Attach responsibility for strategies to be carried out:
•
What:
•
When:
•
Who:
Assign oversight responsibility or accountability process (to make sure nothing falls through the cracks
due to a change of personnel, etc.)
•
What:
•
When:
•
Who:
•
Finally, assess effectiveness of strategies and use results to make improvements
For more information about the
Performance Measures and
Standards, visit Cape Fear
Community College’s
Institutional Effectiveness web
page at
http://www.cfcc.edu/ie/measures.
htm.