DruQuaR Functional quality of new peptide drugs: receptor-binding and tissue-interactions M. Verbeken1, V.
Download ReportTranscript DruQuaR Functional quality of new peptide drugs: receptor-binding and tissue-interactions M. Verbeken1, V.
DruQuaR Functional quality of new peptide drugs: receptor-binding and tissue-interactions M. Verbeken1, V. Vergote1, C. Burvenich1, C. Van de Wiele1, A. Ronai2, K. Gyires2, W. Luyten3 and B. De Spiegeleer1* 1 Ghent University, Harelbekestraat 72, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium 2 Semmelweis University, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary 3 Leuven University, Naamsestraat 59, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium *Corresponding author: [email protected] (Ref.: 2009-238f) INTRODUCTION The study of biomedical effects of peptide pharmaceuticals, not only lead drug structures but their derived fragments, label-modified analogues, metabolites, related synthesis and degradation impurities for qualification evaluation as well, are studied using receptor-ligand binding (RLB) and tissue-bath (TB) experiments. The importance of such a biomedical, functional quality, screening approach is substantiated by the wide variety of physiological effects already seen with known peptides. However, errors of the type I (false positives or α) and type II (false negatives or β) need to be minimized and controlled. EXPERIMENTAL Tissue-bath experiments The effect on smooth muscle contraction of peptide-mixtures is tested covering 4 different tissues from different species: vas deferens (mouse, mVD), aortic rings (rat, rAOR), trachea and ileum longitudinal muscle strips (guinea pig, gpT and gpI resp). Different experimental conditions are used to extract maximal useful information. In mVD and gpI, the inhibitory effect of peptides is tested on electrical stimulated contraction, in rAOR and gpT on phenylephrine (PE) induced contractions. Inhibition of contraction is expressed in comparison to respectively maximum electrical or chemical (PE) stimulated contractions. Phenylephrine Radio-ligand binding studies Homogenates (equivalent to 30 µg of protein) of tissue, e.g. rat lung, were incubated with different concentrations of 125I-peptide, e.g. VIP, in a total volume of 500 µl. The reaction conditions are screened by a very efficient, high content PB-DoE [1]. After incubation, the reaction was terminated by rapid filtration through (overnight) presoaked and (just before use) prerinsed glass fiber filterplates on a cell harvester and washing four times with 2 ml of ice-cold buffer. The radioactivity of the filters (after being transferred into polypropylene tubes) was determined using a gamma counter. The specific binding of 125I-peptide was determined experimentally from the difference between counts in the absence and presence of excess unlabeled peptide. Adsorption was investigated on 125I-peptide samples containing no tissue homogenate. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Typical results are given here. Other peptides were successfully analyzed using the same methodology (data not given in this presentation). Table 1: TB experiment pept159 (chemical stimulation, rAOR) Exp_Setting Mean result (g) % Specific binding % Non-specific binding Non-specific / total binding ratio 70.7 0.28 68.0 0.996 No additive 68.2 1.39 58.7 0.977 BSA No additive 52.8 -2.38 61.2 1.040 - No additive BSA 68.4 -1.86 61.3 1.031 5 BSA No additive BSA 66.4 0.04 57.0 0.999 6 - BSA BSA 69.6 -0.55 58.0 1.010 7 PEI No additive No additive 0.6 2.43 1.4 0.368 0,8 8 - PEI No additive 0.6 2.97 1.1 0.263 0,6 9 PEI No additive BSA 0.5 3.91 1.0 0.197 10 - PEI BSA 0.5 2.21 1.3 0.373 11 PEI BSA No additive 0.6 9.13 1.6 0.147 12 BSA PEI No additive 0.8 5.75 0.9 0.135 13 BSA BSA No additive 64.5 -1.90 58.4 1.034 14 PEI PEI No additive 0.4 2.75 1.0 0.271 1. PE control contraction mean 0.8501 2. Ach control relaxation mean 0.5789 3. PE contraction mean after administration pept159 4. ACH relaxation mean after administration pept159 0.8312 0.4182 Figure 1: TB experiment pept159 1,0 Contraction (g) Table 3: Influence of filtration in RLB studies [1] 0,4 0,2 Exp # Presoaking (150 µl) Prerinsing (2 ml) Washing (4 × 2 ml) % Adsorbed on filter 1 - No additive No additive 2 BSA No additive 3 - 4 0,0 PE_C Ach_C PE_SBO Ach_SBO CONCLUSIONS Results of the present RLB study demonstrate that multi-factorial DOE is a powerful tool for investigating the influence of variables in the RLB development. DOE allows a reduction in the number of experiments with a complete exploration of the experimental domain to be studied. Furthermore, false negative results can be significantly reduced when applying this approach. Moreover, tissue bath experiments can give overall physiologically significant information, where a screening approach with different tissues under different operational conditions is considered the most efficient approach. REFERENCES [1] V. Vergote, S. Van Dorpe, M. Verbeken, C. Burvenich, C. Van de Wiele, W. Banks, B. De Spiegeleer. Development of peptide receptor binding assays: methods to avoid false negatives. Submitted for publication (2009).